Jump to content

Wieters' blast tonight


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Except its not. Average-ish hitting catcher with good defense. That was my point. That's why I said Molina. The fact that Wieters may end up with a WAR of .4 higher doesn't change that and it is idiotic to even point that out as if it is an exaggeration. Its just you doing what you do..Trying to cause an argument over nothing.

You SHOULD be smart enough to understand where I am going with the Molina comment...SHOULD being the key word I guess.

I really need to learn to ignore you because most of the time, this is all you bring anymore..Such a shame, you used to be worth reading.

He's not an average hitting catcher, he's an average hitter period as has been shown. Him having a WAR higher than any year any Molina has ever had in his 2nd full season is pretty telling that he's not just a Molina brother. He's better than that. That's all I was saying. Sorry that you take such offense to a simple factual statement.

As far as your other nonsense, I had a response written out, but I'll be the bigger man here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Wieters is at least twice as good defensively as any of the 5 C's who are ahead of him offensively. Nobody was disappinted with Ozzie Smith's career 87 OPS+ bat, when he was a perreniel AS because of his glove. The defensive adjustment is greater for C's than SS. I am not sure people understand just how much better Wieters is with his glove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wieters is at least twice as good defensively as any of the 5 C's who are ahead of him offensively. Nobody was disappinted with Ozzie Smith's career 87 OPS+ bat, when he was a perreniel AS because of his glove. The defensive adjustment is greater for C's than SS. I am not sure people understand just how much better Wieters is with his glove.
We understand...we just don't care.

He was drafted to be a franchise, cornerstone player...He isn't even remotely close to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We understand...we just don't care.

He was drafted to be a franchise, cornerstone player...He isn't even remotely close to that.

Franchise catchers don't exist anymore or at least your interpretation of them. They are a dying breed. It's too demanding physically for Mauer. Posey went down. Molina is a franchise catcher, but he doesn't really provide the thump. Honestly guys it's time to get over it with the whole Wieters can't hit thing. You just don't get the thump from the catcher position in today's MLB. Nobody except the tigers is really getting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if Ozzie was your SS you'd be disappointed in him as well? :rolleyestf:
First of all, Ozzie did that for a career, not one season, so let's not put Wieters at that level quite yet. You are ready to call him one of the greatest fielders ever, for any position?

Secondly, if all Manny Machado ends up being is the equivalent to what Wieters is now, a 730ish OPS, upper echelon fielder than yes, I would be disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Franchise catchers don't exist anymore or at least your interpretation of them. They are a dying breed. It's too demanding physically for Mauer. Posey went down. Molina is a franchise catcher, but he doesn't really provide the thump. Honestly guys it's time to get over it with the whole Wieters can't hit thing. You just don't get the thump from the catcher position in today's MLB. Nobody except the tigers is really getting it.

Brian McCann says hi. Alex Avila and Carlos Santana say hi. Buster Posey and Joe Mauer say hi. The idea that a franchise catcher doesn't exist is ridiculous, because they do, and right now Matt Wieters, offensively at least, but in my view overall, is the worst of them all, and that is unacceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Franchise catchers don't exist anymore or at least your interpretation of them. They are a dying breed. It's too demanding physically for Mauer. Posey went down. Molina is a franchise catcher, but he doesn't really provide the thump. Honestly guys it's time to get over it with the whole Wieters can't hit thing. You just don't get the thump from the catcher position in today's MLB. Nobody except the tigers is really getting it.
McCann, Mauer, Posey...all are franchise catchers.

And you can't say you don't see it and then say you see it in Detroit.

People have gone from he is a franchise player and future face of the team to be excited that he is a 3 WAR player, 3 years into his career, while barely being an average hitter.

If Wieters was another team and the Orioles passed him up, most of you would be saying that it wasn't that big of a deal that we didn't draft him. You would be talking about how good our scouts were for identifying his slow bat, long swing, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McCann, Mauer, Posey...all are franchise catchers.

And you can't say you don't see it and then say you see it in Detroit.

Posey is done. Mauers catching days with good offense is over. McCann can't stay healthy and his defense is atrocious. There isn't a single catcher today who would fit your description of a franchise player. The problem with our offense has been horrible production form 1B these past years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posey is done. Mauers catching days with good offense is over. McCann can't stay healthy and his defense is atrocious. There isn't a single catcher today who would fit your description of a franchise player. The problem with our offense has been horrible production form 1B these past years.
How is Posey done? Do you have a link saying he is done?

Mauer was an elite hitter for like 6 years and could still be that player

McCann came into this season with 5 straight years of 130 or more games played and 4 of those years were 138 or more.

In other words, your argument is awful and has no facts behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We understand...we just don't care.

He was drafted to be a franchise, cornerstone player...He isn't even remotely close to that yet.

Fixed that for you.

OK, fair enough. He's not a franchise player right now, and maybe he never will be. But let's wait and see. I agree with you that if this is the level at which he is going to hit, we won't have gotten what we'd hoped out of the pick, because expectations were so high. I still think he will hit significantly better, for reasons I've stated. No point in arguing about it -- we will see what happens.

He has the second-highest WAR of anyone in his draft class, and his WAR is increasing every year. He's already 9th all time in WAR among players who were drafted no. 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Posey done?

Mauer was an elite hitter for like 6 years and could still be that player

McCann came into this season with 5 straight years of 130 or more games played and 4 of those years were 138 or more.

In other words, your argument is awful and has no facts behind it.

Mauer is done at catcher. He has to move. McCann can hit. That's great, but his fielding is terrible. Posey is injured and may never be the same. Where all the franchise catchers? Injured and non productive according to your interpretation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mauer is done at catcher. He has to move. McCann can hit. That's great, but his fielding is terrible. Posey is injured and may never be the same. Where all the franchise catchers? Injured and non productive according to your interpretation.
4 of the last 6 seasons, McCann has had a WAR of 4 or higher and one of those years is this year...and its 3.8...so he will likely go over 4 again.

So, McCann's "lack of defense" still makes him a player worth around 20M a season.

Again, you are wrong.

And if all we got 6 elite hitting years from Wieters and he had to move to first base, so be it. Not sure why you are using Mauer here..He hurts your cause, not help it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mauer is done at catcher. He has to move. McCann can hit. That's great, but his fielding is terrible. Posey is injured and may never be the same. Where all the franchise catchers? Injured and non productive according to your interpretation.

I don't agree with SG's position regarding Wieters, but none of these points undercut what he said about when hitters show they are elite. Just like I agreed with you that most young pitchers never get much better, it'a also true that most really excellent hitters have proved they are excellent hitters by the time they are Wieters' age, regardless of what position they play. Sure, there are plenty of exceptions, and I personally believe Wieters will be one of them. But by and large, SG is correct about what happens most of the time (even for catchers).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I had such a crush on Nena in 1983-but I'm thinking  more Peter Pan?              
    • Suites and corporate partnerships have always been a massive part. They need those partnerships, suite sales, etc…always have.
    • In all the interviews with the front office folks, nothing makes me think they are tossing things out the window because of an organizational approach. Like Frobby said, approach hasn't change between the first half of the year and today, and I do not think the level of O's analytics is going to ignore obvious things like that. These are just not going to be things they haven't thought about before. I do worry some about defensive fundamentals which have been lacking since the Bobby Dickerson days, though I think that has nothing to do with analytics (which is more about positioning) and more to do with the fact that Dickerson was very good at his job and whoever is doing that work now is not as good.
    • I think one the best things that Elias brought to the team is having everyone on the same page.    The GM, Manager, Coaches both majors and minors leagues, the  players and the scouts.    That was  not where the O's were before Elias.   I think there is a real benefit to that. I think the problems with the O's can be summed up in a few words. 1) Injuries.    2) Breaking in rookies.   3) Fatigue  4)Pitchers not holding runners I think its a waste  of time to point out how many pitchers the O's have lost to a group on the OH.  Everyone knows.   And they know the pitching would be much better with all the O's pitchers healthy. Losing Westburg hurt the team on both sides the ball.  Gunnar has play 142 of the 144 games. 140 of those were at SS.   If Mateo was healthy during the dog days of summer would Gunnar have gotten a few days at DH that helped him get some rest?     You can say a lot of things about Hays but when he was in left the ball consistently and accurately was on target to 2nd base.   And the other team knew it and often did not run.  Cowser has a strong arm but the accuracy is a work in progress.   That is what happens when rookies are developed in the majors.     Holliday has the same rookie problem.  It will get better but it does affect the team, The offense is 2nd in the majors.   But what we are seeing in the 2nd half has a lot to do with fatigue. Both  Burnes and Kimbrel concentrate more on getting the hitters out and little on holding the runners.   And the other team takes advantage. For me looking at whether the current analytics based approach could use more old school in not really the point.    Any problems the O's have are more: 1) Injuries.    2) Breaking in rookies.   3) Fatigue  4) Pitchers not holding runners
    • It kind of burns me that the Rangers sandwiched a World Series win between two seasons when they were not even close to contention (and possibly below .500 in both).   Even the year they won, they weren't that good.   They just got on a heater when it mattered most.   
    • OHearn is playing too much though. His numbers since Aug 1 aren’t good.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...