Jump to content

Jake Layman


Recommended Posts

You know what? I'm gonna bring up Gary, because I can recall tons of threads where any Gary bashing was met with extreme dismissal and wrath amongst those that defended him.

Some of the nastiest things that have been said to me on this board came out of Gary-bashing threads. I've had big-time arguments with SportsGuy, Beaner and VaTech (three posters who I really respect) over Gary Williams.

The fact is, Turgeon is doing in his FIRST FREAKING YEAR what Gary absolutely refused to do for the larger part of his career and that's go out there and get your hands dirty (NOT in a bad way) and RECRUIT.

Maryland has won a national championship, we've been two two final fours and are, in my opinion, the third most prestigious program in the most prestigious basketball conference in the country.

Having that sort of cache you shouldn't have to rely on a bunch of after-thoughts to round out your roster. Kids like Cleare and Layman should WANT to come here. It finally looks like the tide is turning and if it's not I'll gladly eat crow.

But I like what I see so far and a top 10 recruiting class for 2012 would speak volumes about what kind of recruiter Turgeon is and the sort of approach Gary Williams had to recruiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You know what? I'm gonna bring up Gary, because I can recall tons of threads where any Gary bashing was met with extreme dismissal and wrath amongst those that defended him.

Some of the nastiest things that have been said to me on this board came out of Gary-bashing threads. I've had big-time arguments with SportsGuy, Beaner and VaTech (three posters who I really respect) over Gary Williams.

And of course, it went the other way as well. Those who did not support Gary were often rude, arrogant, and condescending.

That's why I'm saying, just let it go. Again, no one's going to change anyone's minds. No one's going to be proven right or wrong. I was a big Gary supporter who was ready for him to go by the end, and I'm thrilled it went down the way it did. He left on good terms and is still actively involved in the MD program, as he should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And of course, it went the other way as well. Those who did not support Gary were often rude, arrogant, and condescending.

And most of the complaints about his supporters come from comments in response to those posts. But I guess history is written by the victor, who get to whitewash anything they don't like from the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what? I'm gonna bring up Gary, because I can recall tons of threads where any Gary bashing was met with extreme dismissal and wrath amongst those that defended him.

Some of the nastiest things that have been said to me on this board came out of Gary-bashing threads. I've had big-time arguments with SportsGuy, Beaner and VaTech (three posters who I really respect) over Gary Williams.

The fact is, Turgeon is doing in his FIRST FREAKING YEAR what Gary absolutely refused to do for the larger part of his career and that's go out there and get your hands dirty (NOT in a bad way) and RECRUIT.

Maryland has won a national championship, we've been two two final fours and are, in my opinion, the third most prestigious program in the most prestigious basketball conference in the country.

Having that sort of cache you shouldn't have to rely on a bunch of after-thoughts to round out your roster. Kids like Cleare and Layman should WANT to come here. It finally looks like the tide is turning and if it's not I'll gladly eat crow.

But I like what I see so far and a top 10 recruiting class for 2012 would speak volumes about what kind of recruiter Turgeon is and the sort of approach Gary Williams had to recruiting.

Yeah, I mean I think most MD fans have always respected and appreciated Gary and what he meant to the program. That's never going to change but people we're bashed on here for accurately pointing out that Gary wasn't doing a crucial part of his job very well at all. And it wasn't even that he wasn't doing it well it was that he had no desire to do it at all. Plain and simple, he hated what college recruiting had become over the last decade. He refused to bend in his ways at all and it hurt this program. No one should get a free pass for half assing their job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And most of the complaints about his supporters come from comments in response to those posts. But I guess history is written by the victor, who get to whitewash anything they don't like from the discussion.

The problem is that in this case there are no victors. No one's going to come out right or wrong. It's all a matter of a opinion. So we'll just keep having the same tired debate...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's never going to change but people we're bashed on here for accurately pointing out that Gary wasn't doing a crucial part of his job very well at all.

And people were bashed for that bashing. And for far less aggressive discussion. So I don't want to hear it. You guys got what you wanted, congratulations. All anyone can do now is hope you all were right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And people were bashed for that bashing. And for far less aggressive discussion. So I don't want to hear it. You guys got what you wanted, congratulations. All anyone can do now is hope you all were right.

I don't think there is any doubt we were right when it comes to recruiting. Now, ultimately that has to translate to wins on the court but I'll take my chances with superior talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is any doubt we were right when it comes to recruiting. Now, ultimately that has to translate to wins on the court but I'll take my chances with superior talent.

Yet I don't think there was a group on the other side of what you were right about. Gary supporters including myself mostly recognized that he wasn't recruiting as well as he should have, although his recruiting wasn't as bad as some made it out to be and was improving. We just didn't think a guy who had done so much for MD and was still having some level of success should be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet I don't think there was a group on the other side of what you were right about. Gary supporters including myself mostly recognized that he wasn't recruiting as well as he should have, although his recruiting wasn't as bad as some made it out to be and was improving. We just didn't think a guy who had done so much for MD and was still having some level of success should be fired.

Yeah, people were recognizing it but still defended it and made excuses for him. And his recruiting pretty much was as bad as it was made out to be for a 3 or 4 year stretch. While very critical of his recruiting, I never advocated firing him. Firing him was not an option and would have hurt not only the program but the University. I was just waiting for him to retire because I knew the program could be better with fresh blood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual, people just going out of their way to dis Gary Williams.

See, I can play that game too.

My point is - just let it go. Neither side is going to change their mind. The Gary Williams era, for better or worse, is over. The Turgeon era has begun. Rather than bring up Gary in every thread, let's just look forward at this point.

You know whats ironic. The first person to mention Gary in this thread was a self proclaimed Gary defender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While very critical of his recruiting, I never advocated firing him. I just was waiting for him to retire because I knew the program could be better with fresh blood. Oh, and his recruiting pretty much was as bad as it was made out to be for a 3 or 4 year stretch.

I think his recruiting was turning around of late and his recruiting right after the title was better than some give him credit for (results were disappointing), but yeah, it wasn't nearly as good as it should have been.

I just don't see any reason why people would be gloating about the Gary issue after a signing of a guy ranked around 50th. The main reason being other than this not being that great of a get is the aforementioned concurrence by most Gary supporters that Gary's recruiting was lacking and a new coach would very likely do better in that regard.

Now there was plenty of debate about whether a new coach would likely be better for the program. We are far from being able to accurately answer that, but things look promising.

Regardless of what happens I don't think the people including you who simply had my position that he shouldn't be fired, can not be shown to be wrong imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If we were to DH Kjerstad instead of O'Hearn it would be an entire starting 10 who had only played for the Orioles in their MLB career.   Wonder when the last time we ever had such a lineup (if ever).
    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...