Jump to content

Very Interesting NY Daily News Article about Angelos and Showalter


calhof2007

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nothing really new in here. What I don't understand, if I am reading this correctly, is why the player development department should have a direct line to Angelos at all.
Coughstockstillcough.

I said it like 3 years ago...He needs to go..He needed to go then, he needs to go now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It gets in the way of his agenda of bashing MacPhail 24-7. Which is pointless, at this stage, since it is completely obvious that MacPhail is gone at the end of this season.

Angelos isn't the only problem and isn't the main reason the team has failed for the past 4 years. He's part of the problem but MacPhail and the way he ran Baseball Ops, and the people he put in charge and gave chances to are the issue.

Peter Angelos didn't hire Lee MacPhail who oversees probably the worst professional scouting in the majors, Peter Angelos didn't give Dave Trembley too many chances after it was clear he wasn't the guy. Peter Angelos didn't sign Garrett Atkins, Mike Gonzalez, Ty Wigginton, Cesar Izturis, Steve Trachsel, Adam Eaton etc.

Peter Angelos didn't fail to address the SS position after Tejada was traded in 2008, which forced three no hit SS on the roster for lack of a better option and as a result screwed up the roster management.

Andy MacPhail did all these things. You can't just make him a victim. Did he have restrictions? Of course, but he defended the owner every chance he got, and he never walked away. He could have always quit if he didn't get do to what he wanted to do.

If you want to blame Angelos, blame him for hiring Andy MacPhail in the first place and giving him the authority over baseball operations and allowing the team to sink to its lowest point in franchise history. That is where he deserves blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Angelos isn't the only problem and isn't the main reason the team has failed for the past 4 years. He's part of the problem but MacPhail and the way he ran Baseball Ops, and the people he put in charge and gave chances to are the issue.

Peter Angelos didn't hire Lee MacPhail who is oversees probably the worst professional scouting in the majors, Peter Angelos didn't give Dave Trembley too many chances after it was clear he wasn't the guy. Peter Angelos didn't sign Garrett Atkins, Mike Gonzalez, Ty Wigginton, Cesar Izturis, Steve Trachsel, Adam Eaton etc.

Peter Angelos didn't fail to address the SS position after Tejada was traded in 2008, which forced three no hit SS on the roster for lack of a better option and as a result screwed up the roster management.

Andy MacPhail did all these things. You can't just make him a victim. Did he have restrictions? Of course, but he defended the owner every chance he got, and he never walked away. He could have always quit if he didn't get do to what he wanted to do.

If you want to blame Angelos, blame him for hiring Andy MacPhail in the first place and giving him the authority over baseball operations. That is where he deserves blame.

Yes he is.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pray that the next GM will be more successful so you can make the argument "I told you so." Unfortunately, I am not holding my breath.

GM: Pat Gillick Owner: Peter Angelos

GM: Frank Wren Owner: Peter Angelos

GM: Syd Thrift Owner: Peter Angelos

GM: Beattie/Duquette Owner: Peter Angelos

GM: Flanagan Owner: Peter Angelos

GM: MacPhail Owner: Peter Angelos

Seems that there is a familiar pattern here....:D;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you that AM was poor. I have been saying that for years now, before you were.

That being said, he is still hamstrung by our joke of an owner and PA is still the #1 problem.

If this article was about AM and not PA, you would have made 15 posts in this thread already.

You would eat it up.

I don't understand why its so hard for some people to see that Angelos is the real issue. Was MacPhail a good GM? Who knows, really. PA could make any GM look like a buffoon. I don't think MacPhail is as good or as bad as we think. Its hard to make a decision on it when you have a guy who has been hamstrung, and will not throw the owner under the bus and say what the real issues are with the franchise. Maybe Andy will write his memoirs after he leaves and we'll know for sure. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I chopped off your legs, you'd be a lousy marathon runner.

Careful, Sammy. One could point out the fact that wheelchair marathoners actually complete the race faster than we actual runners do. How about, "If someone had chopped off Muhammad Ali's arms, he would not have been such a great boxer." ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MacPhail failed in Chicago where there were no Yankees or Red Sox to contend with.

He is not a good GM and his time has likely passed him by. But we'll never know how much of the last 4 years is truly his vision, good or bad.

Right. AM's history over the last 8-10 years is poor. He isn't very good at his job.

But that is a seperate issue from saying he is the #1 problem with the organization. That answer is PA and it has been for the last decade and a half or so.

Trea has been saying that AM could do whatever he wanted...Well, that quote says that isn't true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about, "If someone had chopped off Muhammad Ali's arms, he would not have been such a great boxer." ???

Hmm, that might not be a good analogy either. I don't think Ali really needed his arms to win.

<iframe width="420" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Cu2nKcfMS9A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. AM's history over the last 8-10 years is poor. He isn't very good at his job.

But that is a seperate issue from saying he is the #1 problem with the organization. That answer is PA and it has been for the last decade and a half or so.

Trea has been saying that AM could do whatever he wanted...Well, that quote says that isn't true.

Angelos has been the #1 problem up until 4 years ago. Then he went hands off and hired MacPhail who took his place as the #1 problem.

Had he been more hands on, perhaps we wouldn't be this bad...

MacPhail was the wrong person to hand autonomy to and set this organization back 3 years with his philosophy.

The Orioles were actually better when they were spending money on mediocre veterans and not relying on their farm and that method wasn't successful or correct either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Angelos isn't the only problem and isn't the main reason the team has failed for the past 4 years.

Yeah, things were awesome 5, 10 years ago. Remember all those playoff runs we made? Too bad MacPhail had to come along and hold our owner hostage. Things were going so well before he got here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, there has been a fair amount of turnover in the player development area over the past four years. Maybe the right people haven't been hired (!) but that's another issue. The only constant name over the last five years, other than a few coaches, is Tripp Norton—maybe it's all his fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, that might not be a good analogy either. I don't think Ali really needed his arms to win.

<iframe width="420" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Cu2nKcfMS9A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I knew that you were going to say that, Sammy. :) There was once a story that the great Willie Pep actually won a round without throwing a single punch. :eek: It turned out to be a myth. Still, I'll bet it wasn't far from the truth.

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=170136

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trea has been saying that AM could do whatever he wanted...Well, that quote says that isn't true.

Jtrea has just been added to my ignore list. I suggest everyone who grows tired of him to do the same.

MacPhail tried to fire Stockstill shortly after AM was hired and was told he couldn't. How is that "AM doing whatever he wanted?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I would add that Mountcastle and Urias were also losses to the offense.  Throw in a couple of slumps to our other regulars, creating 4-5 weak spots in the offense, and that's a lot to overcome.  I don't discount the mental part of hitting, but I do think most of our problems are directly linked to the rash of injuries we've suffered.  
    • Just my opinion. ZiPS projects him for a .708 OPS next year and I'd bet on the under. I think he's a .230/.295/.395 hitter with a below average glove. A Rio Ruiz type of player.
    • We have to keep Irvin "pumped up."  When he's "deflated" he's just no good.  🤣
    • There just seems to be some sort of disconnect between upper management, coaching and the players right now. Do I know that for sure? Obviously no. But with the dropoff we've seen in offensive production something is off here. They literally have been mediocre since the All Star break. And the only big loss on the offensive side is Westburg. 
    • There are no answers, only Zuul. But seriously, I think the issue at play here is we look at the body of work of guys like Eloy, Slater, O'Hearn, Rivera, and (to a lesser extent) Soto, you see where the holes are. I get that O'Hearn was thrust into 1B near FT due to the Mountcastle injury, but that didn't explain Hyde from playing O'Hearn in the OF when he is one of the worst defensive OFers on this team. Right now, this team is very much ailing. Ramon coming back will definitely help spell the need for O'Hearn to be a 1B by maybe letting Rivera play over there.  We need to get back to a point where O'Hearn is only hitting against righties and is playing sparingly in the field. Eloy is a liability at this point. I was a proponent of seeing what mechanical tweaks they could make similar to what they did w/ Hicks (and even O'Hearn!) and they did catch lightning in a bottle maybe due to excitement/adrenaline and BABIP being unsustainably high, but right now his flyballs aren't carrying and his groundballs aren't finding holes, so there's probably a reason why Chicago is saying, "Haha, told you so!" This team is in freefall offensively, at this point...just give the ABs to Mayo. You can't simultaneously say, "He needs to make adjustments!" and then let him have 5 ABs over 5 games. That isn't a way to grow a player. Not everybody can be a part time player and be effective off the bench/sparingly. Kjerstad has shown an ability to hit lefties in the minors as well as in the majors (albeit in very limited time, he his 4 for 10 against them). Let the kid play. Slater has fallen off a cliff, but at least he's a solid defensive OFer I get it, nobody is going to solve the offensive woes of this team when it comes to the rookies/young guys. Mayo, Holliday, Kjerstad, even Cowser...they're all still adjusting. The change needs to come from the main stays. Now, Adley is starting to hit, Gunnar is back on a hitting binge, but this lineup desperately needs some consistent production from Tony to go along with it because right now way too much pressure is being put on the bottom of the lineup and the young guys. And I'm not convinced Westy solves any of those issues as wrist injuries are a beast to bounceback from quickly.   
    • I get the desire to poo-poo analytics and advanced data, etc.  It does get obnoxious hearing about statcast pages in red when guys aren't hitting well.   But more obnoxious are cries of "the old eye test" and "old school" and the other various "yelling at cloud" types of arguments.  If everyone was stuck with the way things were done back in the day, we'd never progress and never advance in any area of life or society.  That includes how we look at and discuss baseball.
    • If the above is true, how do you get a team to deliver timely hits, stop pressing, and quite expecting to lose?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...