Jump to content

MacPhail Coming Back?


brotherlo38

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Roch says he doesn't expect to hear news today.....it is pretty unbelievable that things are dragging out like this.

If MacPhail does come back, the most important thing is that he and Buck are both comfortable with the arrangement and on the same page about the direction of the franchise. The worst possible thing would be a situation where the two aren't seeing eye-to-eye, there are ambiguities about who has authority to do what, and both are having to go to Angelos to try to get their way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is amazing to me is that you have had plenty of time to have this decision made.

This pathetic organization has seen their season over since July and yet,you have no idea what you are going to do?

Angelos is the worst.

Allow me to interrupt the general hand-wringing festival for this brief announcement -

For years, this is so par for the course with Angelos. It's not going to change! I don't like it. However, at the moment, I'm much more ticked off that the Yankees are still in the playoffs.

I asked this in another thread, so I'll try this again. Does it matter that the announcement, if any, comes this week instead of last week? Really?

"If it makes anyone feel better, the Red Sox need a manager and they might need a general manager. The Angels and Cubs need a GM. " - Roch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is pretty unbelievable that things are dragging out like this.

I disagree... It is extremely believable. This is the Orioles...

It seems odd to me that Buck (and pretty much all of the media) hinted that we would know something by last Thursday. AM and PA meet now this is dragging. To me and this is speculation only of course but AM was headed out the door and PA made a convincing case to stay. I can't think that money is what would keep him here so what is it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see AM back and am mildly encouraged by the news - though the process is a bit more complicated than necessary.

I think 2011 was a decent year from the GM's point of view - many solid/strong moves on the trade front, international prospects emerging, etc.

I think when we hired Buck that our FO between AM and BS was the best we've seen in years and I still feel that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody should want to see that because it means the Orioles do not care about winning.

We won't win anything with Andy MacPhail as GM.

This is absolutely ridiculous. No matter whether or not AM is capable of winning, it does not say the Orioles don't care about winning because they obviously think he can.

I wouldn't agree with the decision, but I'm also not comfortable questioning their integrity, which apparently you have no problem doing. :rolleyestf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would certainly seem like par for the course for this organization. In fact, how they are handling this entire situation is exactly why this organization is in the position it's currently in right now. Angelos has never made a definitive decision in his life without taking a long time to make the decisions.

I'm pretty sure all Orioles organization decision are done in Old Entish ( And yes, that's pretty much the geekiest thing I've posted on here) ;)

This is 100% correct and nobody should be surprised in the least if this is how it plays out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roch says he doesn't expect to hear news today.....it is pretty unbelievable that things are dragging out like this.

If MacPhail does come back, the most important thing is that he and Buck are both comfortable with the arrangement and on the same page about the direction of the franchise. The worst possible thing would be a situation where the two aren't seeing eye-to-eye, there are ambiguities about who has authority to do what, and both are having to go to Angelos to try to get their way.

The unbelievable thing would be that you would expect anything different.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I would add that Mountcastle and Urias were also losses to the offense.  Throw in a couple of slumps to our other regulars, creating 4-5 weak spots in the offense, and that's a lot to overcome.  I don't discount the mental part of hitting, but I do think most of our problems are directly linked to the rash of injuries we've suffered.  
    • Just my opinion. ZiPS projects him for a .708 OPS next year and I'd bet on the under. I think he's a .230/.295/.395 hitter with a below average glove. A Rio Ruiz type of player.
    • We have to keep Irvin "pumped up."  When he's "deflated" he's just no good.  🤣
    • There just seems to be some sort of disconnect between upper management, coaching and the players right now. Do I know that for sure? Obviously no. But with the dropoff we've seen in offensive production something is off here. They literally have been mediocre since the All Star break. And the only big loss on the offensive side is Westburg. 
    • There are no answers, only Zuul. But seriously, I think the issue at play here is we look at the body of work of guys like Eloy, Slater, O'Hearn, Rivera, and (to a lesser extent) Soto, you see where the holes are. I get that O'Hearn was thrust into 1B near FT due to the Mountcastle injury, but that didn't explain Hyde from playing O'Hearn in the OF when he is one of the worst defensive OFers on this team. Right now, this team is very much ailing. Ramon coming back will definitely help spell the need for O'Hearn to be a 1B by maybe letting Rivera play over there.  We need to get back to a point where O'Hearn is only hitting against righties and is playing sparingly in the field. Eloy is a liability at this point. I was a proponent of seeing what mechanical tweaks they could make similar to what they did w/ Hicks (and even O'Hearn!) and they did catch lightning in a bottle maybe due to excitement/adrenaline and BABIP being unsustainably high, but right now his flyballs aren't carrying and his groundballs aren't finding holes, so there's probably a reason why Chicago is saying, "Haha, told you so!" This team is in freefall offensively, at this point...just give the ABs to Mayo. You can't simultaneously say, "He needs to make adjustments!" and then let him have 5 ABs over 5 games. That isn't a way to grow a player. Not everybody can be a part time player and be effective off the bench/sparingly. Kjerstad has shown an ability to hit lefties in the minors as well as in the majors (albeit in very limited time, he his 4 for 10 against them). Let the kid play. Slater has fallen off a cliff, but at least he's a solid defensive OFer I get it, nobody is going to solve the offensive woes of this team when it comes to the rookies/young guys. Mayo, Holliday, Kjerstad, even Cowser...they're all still adjusting. The change needs to come from the main stays. Now, Adley is starting to hit, Gunnar is back on a hitting binge, but this lineup desperately needs some consistent production from Tony to go along with it because right now way too much pressure is being put on the bottom of the lineup and the young guys. And I'm not convinced Westy solves any of those issues as wrist injuries are a beast to bounceback from quickly.   
    • I get the desire to poo-poo analytics and advanced data, etc.  It does get obnoxious hearing about statcast pages in red when guys aren't hitting well.   But more obnoxious are cries of "the old eye test" and "old school" and the other various "yelling at cloud" types of arguments.  If everyone was stuck with the way things were done back in the day, we'd never progress and never advance in any area of life or society.  That includes how we look at and discuss baseball.
    • If the above is true, how do you get a team to deliver timely hits, stop pressing, and quite expecting to lose?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...