Jump to content

What evidence do we have that Angelos...


Skeletor

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I didn't realize that Roberts had been traded ;)

Last offseason, MacPhail and the representatives for likely Hall of Fame designated hitter Vladimir Guerrero had drawn a monetary line in the sand and were seemingly at a standstill when Angelos told MacPhail to spend what it would take to get the free agent.
source - The Sun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

is still meddling? Since the Roberts trade.

Is there a belief that he's been hands off the last couple years with MacPhail and what are the chances he does the same with a new GM?

Which Roberts trade? Atlanta I guess?

1. I think he influenced the Roberts extension and perhaps possible subsequent Roberts trade(s). I don't think AM wanted anything to do with giving Roberts 4/40.

2. I suspect there is something to the scouting and player development side of things with PA resisting change to the good old boy network.

Beyond that, I don't know. I suspect AM had much more leeway than his predecessors and a lot of this stuff is exaggerated. Obviously there is the Tejada issue and probably quite a few others in the past, but they probably go back pre-Roberts trade fiasco.

Sounds to me like Buck is wielding the influence now and was carrying a lot of it last offseason as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't realize that Roberts had been traded ;)

Last offseason, MacPhail and the representatives for likely Hall of Fame designated hitter Vladimir Guerrero had drawn a monetary line in the sand and were seemingly at a standstill when Angelos told MacPhail to spend what it would take to get the free agent.

source - The Sun

I don't take that as proof of meddling. Maybe MacPhail knew what his limit was, and Angelos then gave him permission to exceed it. Crazy thought, maybe...but that sounds more like an owner who wants to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't take that as proof of meddling. Maybe MacPhail knew what his limit was, and Angelos then gave him permission to exceed it. Crazy thought, maybe...but that sounds more like an owner who wants to win.

Yeah, except the sad part of is that the Vladdy money reportedly came at the expense of player development money. If true, I wonder if that part was know upfront by all parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't take that as proof of meddling. Maybe MacPhail knew what his limit was, and Angelos then gave him permission to exceed it. Crazy thought, maybe...but that sounds more like an owner who wants to win.
The line in the sand was $3M, which ended up being deferred in the deal. Another point of view is why is Angelos getting involved in decisions at that level?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The line in the sand was $3M, which ended up being deferred in the deal. Another point of view is why is Angelos getting involved in decisions at that level?

Because it was a disagreement between Buck and Andy and PA took Buck's side. If it were DT instead of Buck it wouldn't have much mattered what DT thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it was a disagreement between Buck and Andy and PA took Buck's side. If it were DT instead of Buck it wouldn't have much mattered what DT thought.
Gee, I thought Andy was the team president, and Buck was the field manager who worked for Andy. Why was Angelos involved again?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The line in the sand was $3M, which ended up being deferred in the deal. Another point of view is why is Angelos getting involved in decisions at that level?

I'm glad he did. Vlad was a risk that was worth taking that MacPhail wanted no part of. It didn't quite work out the way it was planned, but still the risk was worth it IMO.

If only he'd gotten involved with the Tex negotiations and when Matt Holliday was available...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad he did. Vlad was a risk that was worth taking that MacPhail wanted no part of. It didn't quite work out the way it was planned, but still the risk was worth it IMO.

If only he'd gotten involved with the Tex negotiations and when Matt Holliday was available...

There's a pretty big difference between $8MM or whatever the heck Vlad got and eleventybazillion dollars (roughly speaking what Tex and Holliday got) don't you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yes,  I just wonder if Elias thinks he can trade him for a guy in A ball or the rookie league?   What Elias thinks about that will be the different between him being of the 40 man roster in early December or not.
    • Well, I guarantee you that there is a long list of players in MLB history that have seen a drop off in defense between those ages. And how are defining a drop off? The difference between elite to very good is big but not always discernible to the eye.  But that drop off is enough to where he just isn’t all that valuable. Elite is where he must be to provide value. 
    • Very good point.   Look at Jim Palmer.   He had a pretty low K/9 rate for his career(5.0), but had such an amazing defense behind him, his WHIP was 1.18.     
    • Well, I don’t think his range, arm or ability to time plays are going to change materially from this year to next.  In other words, I expect the fundamentals of his defense to be about the same.  What I think can change from this year to next year are: 1.  Mistakes.   He could make more, he could make less.    2.  Random fluctuations in how defensive plays get measured.  They try to make these stats as objective as they can, but it seems there are always some borderline plays that can be judged one way or another.   In other words, I think if Mateo made the exact same plays in 2023 as in 2022, his metrics wouldn’t necessarily be exactly the same.   Among other things, I think some of these stats are measured relative to the other players in the league, so if one player’s performance is the same as the year before, whereas the performance of other players at that position is a little up or down, it will affect that player’s OAA, DRS, etc.  Also I think the surrounding players make a difference.  If you have a 3B with great range, maybe the SS gets fewer chances than if the 3B has poor range.   If the 2B is poor at turning the DP, maybe the shortstop’s conversion rate on DP’s goes down through no fault of his own.    So in short, I expect Mateo’s defensive skills and performance to be about the same next year as this year.   That doesn’t mean that the defensive stats will assess him the same way.    
    • There should not be a defensive drop off between ages 27 and 28.   Now he could be hurt.  His offense is the question mark for next year IMO.  Not his defense.
    • Watching the highlights, Lamar clearly had enough time before the rush got there to get the ball to Duv and just missed him.
    • Tyler Nevin should probably also come off the 40-man roster. He finally had his first decent minor league season since 2018, but he is 25 and almost certainly can only play first at the big league level and most importantly, is out of options next season. He is someone that can fill in in a pinch, but there is almost no chance that he breaks the Opening Day roster next season, so he will have to come off the 40-man roster at the end of spring training anyway to be sent down.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...