Lucky Jim Posted October 19, 2011 Share Posted October 19, 2011 Just having a little fun here but you have Hobgood at #18 who has neither produced or proven he can stay healthy. His health is in bigger question than Townsend's probably and he hasn't shown a thing. Oh, sweet bird of youth! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoGoPower Posted October 19, 2011 Share Posted October 19, 2011 Of the 8 lists posted so far, I threw them into a spreadsheet just to see what the average rank would be for each. I will not criticize anyone's picks; prospect lists are very much an exercise in guessing, both wildly and educated. These are some outliers I noticed, and if on purpose, awesome, but sometimes people miss some players. OldOriole: Baker @ 5, no Bridwell Toad B22: no Esquivel blazer: Townsend @ 26 GoGoPower: Lino @ 4, Hobgood @ 6, Schrader @ 22, Hoes @ 26, Erbe @ 27, no Davis weams: nothing to note RZNJ: nothing to note LookinUp: no E. Rod, Angle @ 10 D'oh, I thought I had him on there but it looks like he got left off somehow. He should have been #13 on my list. Thanks for pointing it out, I'll go back and edit him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-OH Posted October 20, 2011 Author Share Posted October 20, 2011 1. D Bundy2. Machado 3. Schoop 4. B Bundy 5. Hoes 6. Schrader 7. Klein 8. Bridwell 9. Esposito 10. Rodriguez 11. G Davis 12. Avery 13. Adams 14. Wright 15. Esquivel 16. Delmonico 17. Bernadina 18. Hobgood 19. R Berry 20. Simon 21. Angle 22. Vader 23. Miclat 24. Mahoney 25. Henry 26. Townsend 27. Baker 28. Mummey 29. Coffey 30. Givens Next 10: Chalas, Wilson, Lino, Drake, Joseph, T Berry, Sawyer, Veloz, Reuttiger, Davies So, if you were building a farm system and know what you know right now, you would take Hobgood over Simon, Angle, Miclat, Henry, Townsend, Baker, Mummey, Berry and Lino? You always put together a good list so why so high on Hobgood besides his draft status? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-OH Posted October 20, 2011 Author Share Posted October 20, 2011 Don't forget, the Orioles gave Nick Delmonico $1.525 millions for a reason. I keep seeing him pretty low on a lot of lists and he's basically a 1st round draft pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnD Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 He is? Or is he just paid like one? Where would someone have to be taken in the first round to get paid a bonus he got? And why didn't another team use that pick on him instead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 He is? Or is he just paid like one? Where would someone have to be taken in the first round to get paid a bonus he got? And why didn't another team use that pick on him instead? As high as number 16 overall or later with the right circumstances. But as a sign-ability pick? 15 or 16 in the first round.http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110815&content_id=23240260&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Jim Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 Don't forget, the Orioles gave Nick Delmonico $1.525 millions for a reason. I keep seeing him pretty low on a lot of lists and he's basically a 1st round draft pick. As high as number 16 overall or later with the right circumstances. But as a sign-ability pick? 15 or 16 in the first round.http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20110815&content_id=23240260&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=14690099&topic_id=18682064 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-OH Posted October 20, 2011 Author Share Posted October 20, 2011 He is? Or is he just paid like one? Where would someone have to be taken in the first round to get paid a bonus he got? And why didn't another team use that pick on him instead? Because his asking price was $1.5- $2 million dollars and apparently the other organizations did not want or could not go that high. Remember, not every organization out there does the over slot thing so even if some team thought he was a late first round talent, they may not have the ownership go ahead to draft and pay a guy after that first round that kind of money. From what I heard, Delmonico was very impressive in the instructional league and may be one of the best high school hitter they have drafted in over 20+ years. Of course that's a bit of a backhanded compliment considering the hitters that made it the Orioles after being drafted out of high school is a very short list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Jim Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 Because his asking price was $1.5- $2 million dollars and apparently the other organizations did not want or could not go that high. Remember, not every organization out there does the over slot thing so even if some team thought he was a late first round talent, they may not have the ownership go ahead to draft and pay a guy after that first round that kind of money. From what I heard, Delmonico was very impressive in the instructional league and may be one of the best high school hitter they have drafted in over 20+ years.Of course that's a bit of a backhanded compliment considering the hitters that made it the Orioles after being drafted out of high school is a very short list. If I remember correctly, the asking price, in combination with a "not awesome" senior year (I don't think it was a bad one), created a enough uncertainty around him to drop him a bit. That's a different thing, and a different risk, then, say, a depreciation in his upside. Good to know he's been impressive so far. This is one of those picks where I was like "love the impulse, worried about the outcome." Adding Bundy and an elite corner bat to our farm system, with top-shelf middle-infield prospects, would be very welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blazer Posted October 23, 2011 Share Posted October 23, 2011 So, if you were building a farm system and know what you know right now, you would take Hobgood over Simon, Angle, Miclat, Henry, Townsend, Baker, Mummey, Berry and Lino? You always put together a good list so why so high on Hobgood besides his draft status? Hobgood is still pretty high on my list because he was a high school 1st round pick and is still pretty young. However, at that point of the list you could argue for any of the guys you mentioned. Townsend, Mummey and Berry have all had injury issues but still have good ceilings. Angle, Miclat and Henry should have ML careers but don't have high ceilings. Simon, Baker and Lino have played mostly or exclusively in short season, but have ML talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-OH Posted October 24, 2011 Author Share Posted October 24, 2011 Tony, you've heard a lot of things during your time. It doesn't always agree with what you finally wind up seeing. How much skepticism do you have regarding these reports? Well, I always try and get as many thoughts as possible on guys so the more sources I have on a guy the better I feel. Of course I also feel a TON better when I get my own eyes on them but that's not always possible with the 1st year or just drafted guys. unfortunately, there's not a ton to get excited about so the newly drafted guys are still the shiny nickle. I'm feeling pretty good about the list this year but I also think there are going to be some surprises up and down the top 30. As always, I'm going to take some grief on some Hangout favorites as they slide down the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookinUp Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I'm going to take some grief on some Hangout favorites as they slide down the list. I'm thinking Klein and Townsend will slide. Maybe Bridwell, but I'm not sure. I do think Esposito and Delmonico have to be in the 5-7 range (after Bundys, Machado, Schoop). I'll be surprised if 2 of Hoes, Bridwell or the really young guys jump above them. One, maybe, but not two. [Edit: After writing this post, I see that I have Delmonico 8th. Now I'm thinking he'll be more like 5-6. Also, I can see Schrader (OH favorite) sliding. My list becomes quite uninformed after about #8...lol. So, my new top 8 is Machado, Bundy, Schoop, Bundy, Delmonico, Esposito, Hoes, Bridwell.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Jim Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I'm thinking Klein and Townsend will slide. Maybe Bridwell, but I'm not sure. I do think Esposito and Delmonico have to be in the 5-7 range (after Bundys, Machado, Schoop). I'll be surprised if 2 of Hoes, Bridwell or the really young guys jump above them. One, maybe, but not two.[Edit: After writing this post, I see that I have Delmonico 8th. Now I'm thinking he'll be more like 5-6. Also, I can see Schrader (OH favorite) sliding. My list becomes quite uninformed after about #8...lol. So, my new top 8 is Machado, Bundy, Schoop, Bundy, Delmonico, Esposito, Hoes, Bridwell.] I'd be pretty surprised if Hoes, Esposito and Delmonico were ahead of Bridwell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcard Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 My guess at Tony's list: 1. Machado 2. D. Bundy 3. Schoop 4. Schrader 5. Hoes 6. Bridwell 7. B. Bundy 8. Esposito 9. Klein 10. Avery 11. E. Rodriguez 12. Adams 13. Esquival 14. G. Davis 15. Delmonico 16. Vader 17. Townsend 18. Mummey 19. Henry 20. Wright 21. Miclat 22. Drake 23. D. Baker 24. Coffey 25. Angle 26. Simon 27. Wilson 28. R Berry 29. Lino 30. Mahoney Honorable Mention: (in no particular order) Bywater, Givens, Martin, Cowan, Wirsch, Hobgood, Joseph My list: 1. Machado 2. D. Bundy 3. Schoop 4. B. Bundy 5. Hoes 6. Klein 7. Bridwell 8. Mahoney 9. E Rodriguez 10. Avery 11. Schrader 12. Townsend 13. Esquival 14. Delmonico 15. Adams 16. Miclat 17. Esposito 18. D Baker 19. Vader 20. Mummey 21. Wright 22. Chalas 23. Medina 24. Angle 25. Hudson 27. Zach Phillips 28. Wilson 29. Coffey 30. Lino 31. Joseph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookinUp Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I'd be pretty surprised if Hoes, Esposito and Delmonico were ahead of Bridwell. We'll see. I think Bridwell is REALLY raw still. He's closer to the rookie league guys than Bobby Bundy, for example. We know Tony likes Hoes' bat, Esposito is a high 2nd round pick and Delmonico is rated in the same area. If he likes Bridwell better than them I'll be happy because that means Bridwell has shown more in practice than than just projectability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.