Jump to content

Tatum Claimed


Richmond Bird 9

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't think it is an odd time to make the move, but I do think it is kind of odd to wiave Tatum without another backup catcher on the 40 man roster. Tatum was adequate and cheap. He had about 2 years of service time and wasn't being paid much over the $414K minimum. Now the O's may have to pay more for the back up. Buck must have really not liked the way he played.
Why? You can shake a tree and 10 Craig Tatums fall out.

It's no problem to find a backup catcher better than Tatum. He had a .475 OPS this past season. That's impossibly bad. And he was nothing special on defense. Of course Buck didn't like the way he played-- Buck has eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you could get Doumit and Cuddyer on cheaper deals for what they are worth you could have two guys who could cover C, 1B(both), 2B, 3B, and Corner outfield (both). And neither is bad with the bat. With Andino on the bench you have every position covered with those three and players on your bench who wouldn't hurt your lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you could get Doumit and Cuddyer on cheaper deals for what they are worth you could have two guys who could cover C, 1B(both), 2B, 3B, and Corner outfield (both). And neither is bad with the bat. With Andino on the bench you have every position covered with those three and players on your bench who wouldn't hurt your lineup.

How are the Orioles going to get one player much less two players on the cheap? Especially Cuddyer, he won't be cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are the Orioles going to get one player much less two players on the cheap? Especially Cuddyer, he won't be cheap.

I agree, but I suppose it depends on the definition of cheap. Cuddyer isn't going to be cheap by any stretch of the word, but he could be cheaper than some think. Let's say that we could get Cuddyer on a 2/$16M deal, would that qualify as cheap?

I think there are smarter ways to spend $16M over 2 years, but I am not sure that one move really stops the Orioles from completing another. That being said, it is the Orioles and they really have not shown the ability to grasp the right way to build a contender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? You can shake a tree and 10 Craig Tatums fall out.

It's no problem to find a backup catcher better than Tatum. He had a .475 OPS this past season. That's impossibly bad. And he was nothing special on defense. Of course Buck didn't like the way he played-- Buck has eyes.

I am not defending Tatum. I think the O's should replace him. However, they do have to understand who they are, where they are and what that means.

1. The O's are close to the last place that a FA wants to go because of 14 years of losing.

2. Tatum is paid close to the minimum of 414k.

3. Tatum is under 30 and has a decent arm.

4. The O's have many needs more important than upgrading catcher like adding three pitchers, a better 3rd baseman, and adding a DH. That will take most of the money they have to spend.

5. The O's have a limited budget.

6. The O's don't have that much to trade without creating other holes in the lineup or pitching staff.

7. There are plenty of other ways to make room on the 40 man roster. izturis and Vlad are FA. Viola nd VandenHurk can be released.

So under those conditions what is the hurry to get Tatum off the roster? Why not wait until a replacement is acquired? Say it costs $1.5M for a better backup catcher. Does that mean they can't do something else they need to do? There is no way to know how the off season plays out at this point. All I am saying is they could have waited on waiving Tatum.

So tell me. Who are the O's going to get to be their backup catcher for 414K that is as good as Tatum? Its probably going to cost something more. How much more is a question. That is why Houston claimed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So tell me. Who are the O's going to get to be their backup catcher for 414K that is as good as Tatum? Its probably going to cost something more. How much more is a question. That is why Houston claimed him.

Tatum has a .570-something career OPS between AAA and the majors. He's 28. He's not known as a defensive wizard. There are dozens of players like that who'd kill for a shot at his major league job for $414k. The O's will have options if they're even halfway competent in filling the position.e

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tatum has a .570-something career OPS between AAA and the majors. He's 28. He's not known as a defensive wizard. There are dozens of players like that who'd kill for a shot at his major league job for $414k. The O's will have options if they're even halfway competent in filling the position.e

Name one. Who is your pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • And the difference with Cowser and Holliday is the team around him. Right now, our lineup is deep and talented, which allows them to let Holliday struggle through without majorly affecting the outcomes of games. Plus there really isn’t an incumbent player pushing him for time. Hays was the entrenched starter last year when Cowser came up, so the only way he was going to play in a pennant race was if he hit as he has this year. The problem with Holliday is purely this: unrealistic expectations. Give him some time. We will reap the benefits of this patience later in the season. You add his bat to what we already have?!?! Watch out!
    • This should be merged into the thread in the minor league forum.   https://forum.orioleshangout.com/topic/51777-seth-johnson-2024/#comment-3104271  
    • Hard to look at his start as “just a slump” when factoring in his second half of last year, too. 
    • Aren't the Tides struggling enough already?
    • Not even a platinum glove is worth that kind of abysmal production at the plate. Elias should capitalize on Hays' option and send him to Norfolk to play every day. If there's an injury to one of the OF's on the major league roster or he gets into a groove at the plate, call him back up. Give Stowers an opportunity - even just as a sparingly-used 4th OF - to reward him for multiple seasons of good production in the minors. 
    • Is this a serious statement?  Did we find out if Cowser was “cut out for the majors” last season when he struggled? Did we find out about Grayson last season when he struggles so much that he had to be sent down? Just curious, how long have you watched baseball? I ask because I have read several of these hyperbolic reactions when the kid hasn’t even played a full week of games and the first thing that I a think is what is this poster’s frame of reference? Have they not watched various top players/prospect struggle when first coming to the show? I don’t mean to be insulting but it get’s a little exhausting reading these type of instantaneous indictments of a 20 year-old uber-talented kid who has not found his groove after 25 ABs.
    • Cowser never had the chance to play every day. It wasn't a similar situation to Holliday's callup outside of poor initial results. Holliday is being given a long leash to struggle and try to figure things out. Cowser had no such opportunity last season. Elias and Hyde were too enamored with Aaron Hicks. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...