Jump to content

Pujols Meeting with Marlins

albert05

By albert05
in MLB

Recommended Posts

clapdiddy Hangout Grand Counsel

clapdiddy

Posted
Posted
Marlins have a new stadium, a new high profile manager in Ozzie Guillen, and have changed their name from Florida to Miami. It wouldn't shock me to see them go in big with Albert and Reyes and make a run at being a contender.

If they add Albert and Reyes, they will undoubtedly be a contender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Can_of_corn Hangout Grand Counsel

Can_of_corn

Posted
Posted

Passan has a piece up on the Marlins:

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=jp-passan_marlins_new_stadium_free_agents_111111

Since 2001, 11 MLB teams have moved into new stadiums. In the first year, eight increased payroll over the previous season, and the three that didn’t dropped less than 5 percent. By Year 3, five of 10 teams lowered payroll from the year before. In Year 4, it was four out of seven, and the three that increased payroll did so by less than 4 percent.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Skeletor All-Star

Skeletor

Posted
Posted
Good for the Marlins if they do make a serious run at Pujols. They've been treated as a farm team for the rich for far too long.

Good for the team that conned the local government out of hundreds of millions of dollars by crying poor even though they made $50 million in profit? Oh, woe is the Marlins. Loria should be in prison for fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MikeAD Hangout Grand Counsel

MikeAD

Posted
Posted

Do Reyes and Pujols really make them contenders? They still need some pitching and their team isn't THAT great offensively. That is a really tough division. The Nats and Braves are just going to keep getting better as time goes by and the Phillies will be ok for another year or 2 before crap hits the fan. They could leap over the Mets.

It would dynamically change the team, but I don't know how far it would go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saintbird All-Star

Saintbird

Posted
Posted
Do Reyes and Pujols really make them contenders? They still need some pitching and their team isn't THAT great offensively. That is a really tough division. The Nats and Braves are just going to keep getting better as time goes by and the Phillies will be ok for another year or 2 before crap hits the fan. They could leap over the Mets.

It would dynamically change the team, but I don't know how far it would go.

Wait, so having Reyes and Pujols wouldn't make them a terrific offensive team? Don't forget about Stanton, that kid is a stud. Their pitching isn't great but it's better than ours and I would venture to say that picking up Reyes and Pujols would make us a contender in the NL East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Three Run Homer
      Jackson Holliday 2023

      By Three Run Homer · Posted

      You're next, Mr. Basallo! 
    • Roll Tide
      Lamar Rumors ****** Updated - Ravens & Jackson agree to 5 year deal******

      By Roll Tide · Posted

      I used the only information that’s available. If I did anything else it would no doubt be treated with accusations that I wouldn’t want to deal with. I did read an article that says the Wonderlic was replaced by it in 2022. There is no saying whether he took it or scored. BTW, Bryce Young scored 98% according to reports. While I like the Bama guy I think his height and light build are against him no matter how smart he is.
    • now
      2024 Opening Day Roster

      By now · Posted

      Just chipping in here on Urias... his power outage combined with defensive lapses of late (not to mention younger competition in house) have me ready to move on after this season. Potential payoff heroics might even sweeten the trade value instead of appetite to retain him. 
    • DrungoHazewood
      Feeling Nostalgic about the 70's

      By DrungoHazewood · Posted

      It was huge. I wasn't old enough to read it until about the 1980 version, but I'd check it out from the library every few weeks and probably read it cover to cover multiple times. It was there that I found things like Willie Keeler's .432 average in 1897, for the National League Baltimore Orioles, of all things. I think many people don't realize that before the McMillan Encyclopedia there was no single comprehensive source for this information. In many cases no source at all. You mention the Whos Whos in Baseball publications, but they only had active players. And I'm not sure how accurate they were, or how comprehensive. If you wanted to see who won the American League in 1907... I don't know. Or who won the 1922 batting title if you didn't have a stack of old Sporting News or Spalding Guides. There were some earlier books, like one called Daguerreotypes, but they were not well known or widely available or probably very accurate. I think it's true that when Ty Cobb retired he probably didn't know how many hits he actually had. When Babe Ruth started hitting homers some writer had to go dig around old guides and total stuff up to see if he was getting near some career record. The main reason a lot of HOF selections from before the 1970s were a little wacky was that the voters mostly were relying on 20 or 50 year old memories because they didn't have a reference. "Oh yea, I remember Bobby Wallace, the greatest shortstop... or was it third baseman... in the 1890s or something." That and the fantastically screwed up voting systems. The Encyclopedia was the beginning of the end of people who'd tell these long-winded stories of great feats of baseball from decades ago that were mostly not true. End of the Cliff Clavin era.
    • Moose Milligan
      What team do you hope we avoid in the ALDS?

      By Moose Milligan · Posted

      I’d say Tampa.    I don’t want to see Arozarena in a playoff series. Ever. He kills us and I’m sure he’d go off on a big stage.  Their pitching is really good.     
    • Hallas
      Lamar Rumors ****** Updated - Ravens & Jackson agree to 5 year deal******

      By Hallas · Posted

      There's a new test called the S2 cognition test that is supposedly a better predictor of QB success rates than Wonderlic, which has a lot of high profile misses, Lamar included.  (Dan Marino, Jim Kelly, Steve McNair among others.)  With the number of misses on the Wonderlic test  it's hard for me to take the test seriously as a predictor of NFL quarterbacking success.  I also found this study that says the same thing:   https://harvardsportsanalysis.org/2014/04/wondering-about-the-wonderlic-does-it-predict-quarterback-performance/#:~:text=From the various tests we,and Wonderlic scores of quarterbacks.   S2 picked up on Brock Purdy being a possible diamond in the rough.  It started being taken around 2015, so its likely Lamar took it, but his score hasn't been publicized.  People made a big deal about it this past draft cycle because CJ Stroud did terribly on it apparenty.
    • Aristotelian
      Can they option someone these last 6 games and still put them on the post season roster?

      By Aristotelian · Posted

      The way I read this, anyone on the 40 man is eligible, even if they are in the minors. Then there are exceptions for players who aren't on the 40an. So yes, I am not expert in roster rules but I believe Grayson, Kjerstad etc could be optioned and still make the postseason roster as long as they stay on the 40 man roster.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...