Jump to content

It's Time For the Percolator Part Deux (DD's comments at GM meeting)


BrunoCherrytown

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think people are overreacting to this comment because of AM's bottom-feeding tactics. It's wrong to assume things are the same based on one comment. Yes, it sounds like something AM would have said, but that doesn't mean it carries the same meaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, because Matusz & Markakis are both very marketable at the moment.

No kidding. If Matusz was a pitcher on another organization, he's one of the types of guys I'd be advocating we try to trade for.....because his trade value would be depressed vs his upside.. We need to acquire his type.....not trade him away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on when you think he was injured. If he throws to a 4.50 ERA as he did through June, I will be satisfied. Yes, I'd like to see some improvement in command, but Jake gave us 12 quality starts in those 16 games and had a 9-4 record. He was pitching hurt in July and it showed.

A 4.50 ERA in a league with a 4.08. I'm not going to be bitterly disappointed with a 4.50, but the O's aren't going to win if their key starters are throwing to a 90 ERA+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No kidding. If Matusz was a pitcher on another organization, he's one of the types of guys I'd be advocating we try to trade for.....because his trade value would be depressed vs his upside.. We need to acquire his type.....not trade him away.
I agree, trading Matusz at this point would be one of the dumbest things we could possibly do. Last year seemed to be a confluence of damaging events and doesn't represent his true talent.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice that Nick's name is not on that list. I'm wondering if it's just assumed that he's part of the core, or that he's available?

I think that's Roch's way of saying...we're not getting the big dogs; we're not blowing it up by trading our two best pieces; in other words, its status quoe for the Orioles!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize that AM had to go and that DD hopefully is going to make a huge difference in the minors with development. With that being said if we aren't going to do any of the dumb FA signings (which I agree on) the hope many on this board are hanging on is the trading of players. As much as AM frustrated me, the man did well with trades. Do you think some on the board who had their pitchforks will miss the days when AM made the good trades? If DD does as well as AM with trades and upgrades our minors that would be great. It would take a miracle to pull off the great trades, rebuild the minors, AND sign the perfect FA(s) to make us a playoff team in the next 3 years. Only our young pitching can do that if they can somehow turn it around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, at least we're not getting lied to this year.

That's all I got.

Yeah, we went from last year, them telling us we are going to go buy bats and get some quality talent in here, to this year, them saying, we'll wait and take what's leftover. What a joke. duquette is a puppet too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we went from last year, them telling us we are going to go buy bats and get some quality talent in here, to this year, them saying, we'll wait and take what's leftover. What a joke. duquette is a puppet too.

You have a short memory. We signed two BIG bats last year. One guy named Lee and the other guy named Guerrero. These guys were not leftovers and both were paid a lot more than they were worth.

Worked out great for us, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a short memory. We signed two BIG bats last year. One guy named Lee and the other guy named Guerrero. These guys were not leftovers and both were paid a lot more than they were worth.

Worked out great for us, huh?

You have a short memory too. We "bought" Reynolds and Hardy. You can buy players with money and with other players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Thank you.  Not sure how easy for someone who may have been doing it for years and someone who’s been talented enough to make it work.   Someone posted a video of Freddie Freeman and Holliday to show similarities but, to me, it just showed how different their lead foot was.  Freeman’s was closed and perfectly in line and parallel to his back foot.  Hollidays foot pointed out and the foot towards 2B position.  I questioned it.  Other guys, who admittedly know more, said it was no problem.  Again, he might be able to become a HOF with those mechanics.  I’ve just never seen a good ML hitter hit that way. From that early January thread “I guess it depends on your definition of “step in the bucket”.  His stride foot definitely doesn’t go straight.  Pretty easy to see where his foot is in relation to the batters box and how much further away it is when it lands.  It doesn’t seem to affect him negatively though.  Interestingly enough, Freeman’s stride foot goes perfectly straight.” Edited January 6 by RZNJ
    • He allowed only one batted ball over 95 MPH, commanding his cutter particularly well in this one. I think the cutter is the most critical pitch for Povich to take the next step. He’s never had issues getting punch outs, he needs to be able to pitch in the zone without relying too much on his fastball. It’s also a key weapon against RHP - if you don’t have a true plus breaking ball or fastball that can overcome the platoon splits (which I don’t think Povich does), you can only make it as a LHP SP through the strength of your cutter and changeup, which are more reverse/neutral splits.  His changeup is probably not good enough to carry him on its own, so it’s the cutter that brings the whole pitch mix together.  
    • Agree he steps in the bucket. In theory should be a relatively easy fix. 
    • His back or shoulder might give out first. Hardly any talented pitcher retires without some sort of serious injury recorded.
    • Plus Member  30.8k Posted January 24 Aram Leighton from Just Baseball on Holliday “He has the tendency to pull off of the ball a bit with his front side, which can minimize his ability to use the ground and his lower half to generate more power, especially on pitches on the outer half. The move does not impede his ability to consistently make contact thanks to his adjustability and feel for the barrel. Holliday projects as an easy plus hitter with more juice to tap into.“ https://www.justbaseball.com/prospects/baltimore-orioles-top-15-prospects-for-2024/
    • I guess my point is that the difference between 91 and 93 at the MLB level is probably negligible.  I would put significant emphasis on pitch sequencing, command and control, and the ability to land his secondary pitches.  If I am recalling his repertoire correctly his most important pitch is his change up.  And it was his ability to effectively throw a breaking pitch, I think it was a Slider, that really ushered in his pre-injury success.  Now you can make the case that 2 miles per hours of fastball velocity may make the change up an even more effective pitch.  I would not argue with you about that aspect, however I am not certain it explains much about his previous success.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...