Jump to content

Who is the next JR House or Jon Knott we could sign this offseason?


NewMarketSean

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Hmmm... if I were a mod, I might be inclined to "close 'er down" right about now.

Well, in that case, let me just say, "Peace, Love, and Happy Holidays to All. We all want the O's to be good, and we all agree that there's no point in looking through the ole orange-colored glasses until the orange kool-aid is ready to drink during the post-season, when BOS fans are crying in their green beer whilst wearing their stupid pink Red Sox hats." I think we can all agree about that, yes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you've lost the ability to actually think about anything. All you seem to do is pull out your same old rants from back-when, even though they have zilch to do with anything that anybody has said here. (At least you admit that you haven't actually read what people are saying, so at least you admit that you're mainly talking to yourself.) Can't you say anything that's not just repeating what you already said a million times before?

So, what's your big point? Which of your retread rants are relevant here? That you don't want the O's to be stupid? Great idea. Then why are you saying things like you did in the Dodger thread, that AM should jump the gun and trade valuable guys, just to get it done, instead of timing it so he can get the best deal... who cares if the other team is ready or not, just do the trade anyway. Can't you please just please stop and think for just half-a-sec before you go off about something?

Thanks for ignoring my question to you. I'll take that as you not having an answer and being wrong about the whole "living in the past" thing. But I already knew you were wrong. You always are.

And talk about pulling out the same old crap. Boy oh boy. Your the master of it. Who needs examples of trades or names of players we should sign when you can just harp on someone for suggesting something different than whats been done for the last 10 years!

As for the "O's not being stupid" thing -- there's another rshack theory that you're projecting onto me. Let's run through some of your greatest hits. You want AM to make "smart moves". Wow, that was brilliant. You want the team to sign a "good LF". Need a nap after that demonstration of your intelligence? When it comes to being vague, you're a pro. When it comes to actually talking strategy and using specific examples, you're out of your friggin' league. SG puts you to shame with the trade ideas he throws out there and all you do is blast him for it. Excuse us for actually talking baseball.

About the Dodger thing. The snippet said that WE as in the ORIOLES were waiting to see if the players we wanted were going to be involved in the MCab trade. I asked why would we be waiting? I said I could understand if the Dodgers would be stalling but thats not what the snippet said!!!!!

So if the Orioles are waiting, which they have been experts at doing the last 10 years (oops, sorry to bring up something that doesn't matter -- the past), shame on them. They should be going after the players THEY want, not waiting around to see if they are still there after the dust has settled.

You don't wait to see if Mary Sue is still available for the prom after the entire football team has their chance to ask her, you go up to her during lunch and you ask her to the prom before they have the chance to ask her.

It's called being aggressive. But maybe that word is too big for you. And maybe you didn't take a date to the prom. And sisters don't count.

So have fun ignoring my points in this post and coming up with something out of nowhere to blast me for. I'm used to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for ignoring my question to you. I'll take that as you not having an answer and being wrong about the whole "living in the past" thing. But I already knew you were wrong. You always are.

[rest of rant deleted]

Please see my previous post. We can agree about that, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't wait to see if Mary Sue is still available for the prom after the entire football team has their chance to ask her, you go up to her during lunch and you ask her to the prom before they have the chance to ask her.

Actually, just buy Mary Sue a couple beers and you won't have to bother with prom... ;)

Mary Sue is fictional, right? Don't wanna insult anyone's wife or girlfriend here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I would add that Mountcastle and Urias were also losses to the offense.  Throw in a couple of slumps to our other regulars, creating 4-5 weak spots in the offense, and that's a lot to overcome.  I don't discount the mental part of hitting, but I do think most of our problems are directly linked to the rash of injuries we've suffered.  
    • Just my opinion. ZiPS projects him for a .708 OPS next year and I'd bet on the under. I think he's a .230/.295/.395 hitter with a below average glove. A Rio Ruiz type of player.
    • We have to keep Irvin "pumped up."  When he's "deflated" he's just no good.  🤣
    • There just seems to be some sort of disconnect between upper management, coaching and the players right now. Do I know that for sure? Obviously no. But with the dropoff we've seen in offensive production something is off here. They literally have been mediocre since the All Star break. And the only big loss on the offensive side is Westburg. 
    • There are no answers, only Zuul. But seriously, I think the issue at play here is we look at the body of work of guys like Eloy, Slater, O'Hearn, Rivera, and (to a lesser extent) Soto, you see where the holes are. I get that O'Hearn was thrust into 1B near FT due to the Mountcastle injury, but that didn't explain Hyde from playing O'Hearn in the OF when he is one of the worst defensive OFers on this team. Right now, this team is very much ailing. Ramon coming back will definitely help spell the need for O'Hearn to be a 1B by maybe letting Rivera play over there.  We need to get back to a point where O'Hearn is only hitting against righties and is playing sparingly in the field. Eloy is a liability at this point. I was a proponent of seeing what mechanical tweaks they could make similar to what they did w/ Hicks (and even O'Hearn!) and they did catch lightning in a bottle maybe due to excitement/adrenaline and BABIP being unsustainably high, but right now his flyballs aren't carrying and his groundballs aren't finding holes, so there's probably a reason why Chicago is saying, "Haha, told you so!" This team is in freefall offensively, at this point...just give the ABs to Mayo. You can't simultaneously say, "He needs to make adjustments!" and then let him have 5 ABs over 5 games. That isn't a way to grow a player. Not everybody can be a part time player and be effective off the bench/sparingly. Kjerstad has shown an ability to hit lefties in the minors as well as in the majors (albeit in very limited time, he his 4 for 10 against them). Let the kid play. Slater has fallen off a cliff, but at least he's a solid defensive OFer I get it, nobody is going to solve the offensive woes of this team when it comes to the rookies/young guys. Mayo, Holliday, Kjerstad, even Cowser...they're all still adjusting. The change needs to come from the main stays. Now, Adley is starting to hit, Gunnar is back on a hitting binge, but this lineup desperately needs some consistent production from Tony to go along with it because right now way too much pressure is being put on the bottom of the lineup and the young guys. And I'm not convinced Westy solves any of those issues as wrist injuries are a beast to bounceback from quickly.   
    • I get the desire to poo-poo analytics and advanced data, etc.  It does get obnoxious hearing about statcast pages in red when guys aren't hitting well.   But more obnoxious are cries of "the old eye test" and "old school" and the other various "yelling at cloud" types of arguments.  If everyone was stuck with the way things were done back in the day, we'd never progress and never advance in any area of life or society.  That includes how we look at and discuss baseball.
    • If the above is true, how do you get a team to deliver timely hits, stop pressing, and quite expecting to lose?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...