Jump to content

Updated: Orioles acquire Taylor Teagarden


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 456
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I understand the logic behind not liking this deal, but I can't be upset that we traded away a player that I've never heard of for a backup catcher. It doesn't make it a good deal...just not outrage worthy.

I'm not personally outraged...I just think they could've got a similar player in free agency without giving up anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His familiarity with the other Rangers players on our roster had a lot to do with it and they probably put in a good word for him to Buck. It's amazing how no offense catchers can be guys who hit.175 and when one hits .235 he can be a good offensive catcher or some will continue to say no offense catcher. How many catchers in the past have played for years in the major leagues that couldn't hit their weight? When they only play once or twice a week it's understandable. I read the rosters for our minor league teams throughout the season and I don't recall Henry or reading anything about him. Doesn't make him a bad player. I'm okay with this deal. We'll find out soon enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keith Law agrees with SG:

keithlaw keithlaw

Somehow I missed that the Orioles gave up an actual prospect (Randy Henry) for backup catcher Taylor Teagarden. That makes no sense.

keithlaw keithlaw

Teagarden's medical file is like The Good Soldier Svejk: Long, funny, and unfinished

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, has Keith Law ever had anything positive to say about the Orioles?

Keith Law seems to have very little positive to say about most teams. His twitter feed is mostly snarky commentary delivered from atop a seemingly very tall horse.

Not saying he isn't right, but he can be pretty douchey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, is there ever anything positive to say about the Orioles?

Come on guys, 5 more post until we hit 20 pages about a trade for a backup catcher!!

The Walrus was Paul.

What if Teagarden is NOT the backup catcher and indeed Wieters' replacement when he gets traded in the Mega deal?

3- 2- 1...

28 Pages here we come!

*disclaimer Totally for humor not reality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Walrus was Paul.

What if Teagarden is NOT the backup catcher and indeed Wieters' replacement when he gets traded in the Mega deal?

3- 2- 1...

28 Pages here we come!

*disclaimer Totally for humor not reality

Haha a conspiracy theroy to get more pages ok I'll help. The world is flat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Walrus was Paul.

What if Teagarden is NOT the backup catcher and indeed Wieters' replacement when he gets traded in the Mega deal?

3- 2- 1...

28 Pages here we come!

*disclaimer Totally for humor not reality

You're forgetting the man crush Duke has on Wieters; he mentions him in practically every interview.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Walrus was Paul.

What if Teagarden is NOT the backup catcher and indeed Wieters' replacement when he gets traded in the Mega deal?

3- 2- 1...

28 Pages here we come!

*disclaimer Totally for humor not reality

Mega 3-team trade coming down the pipeline.

O's trade Wieters, Machado, PTBNL (Dylan Bundy)

Red Sox trade A. Gonzalez

Yankees trade Teixeira

O's receive A. Gonzalez (1B) and Teixeira (move to 3B)

Red Sox receive Machado and Bundy

Yankees receive Wieters

C - Teagarden

1B - A. Gonzalez

2B - BRob/Andino

SS - Hardy

3B - Teixeira

LF - Rasmus (oh yeah, we trade for him too!)

CF - Jones

RF - Kakes

DH - Ortiz

Boom! Playoffs!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...