Jump to content

Will Duquette trade Markakis?


33rdst

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From what I read Kenny Williams has asked for way way to much for Danks. I read a exec. say he asked for the whole team in return. If we could land Danks for Kakes with out kicking in money I would be all over it. I would also hope to get a extension window. I do like Markakis as a player but that contract was just awful and we could get similar production out of a free agent. I prefer to trade Jones as I think the return would be much better but if the Sox offer Danks for Kakes I would pull the trigger. I think Floyd could be had for cheaper. He is another interesting option but I would have a hard time trading Kakes for him unless they kicked in someone like Dayan Viciedo or Addison Reed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Duquette is as handcuffed as I think he is from a budget standpoint, trading Nick for a reasonable return would be too tempting to resist, so I say yes. Moving Nick and Guthrie in smart deals would really help this team right now, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really is amazing to me that he doesn't seem to want to deal Jones...I wonder if that has more to do with Buck?

Jones is such an obvious trade candidate.

I don't think it's amazing at all. That being said, I don't necessarily agree with SJ, either. While it's possible that DD thinks he can build around Jones, despite the obstacles...IMO, hanging onto Jones is more about keeping the casual fans semi-interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's amazing at all. That being said, I don't necessarily agree with SJ, either. While it's possible that DD thinks he can build around Jones, despite the obstacles...IMO, hanging onto Jones is more about keeping the casual fans semi-interested.

Oh, so to keep the casual fans semi-interested, he is willing to do what is wrong for the long term? That's a smart strategy.

I put more blame on Buck though,.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, so to keep the casual fans semi-interested, he is willing to do what is wrong for the long term? That's a smart strategy.

I put more blame on Buck though,.

Baseball's a business...and, it seems, a business that's been making PA money. The "correct" answer is probably something along the lines of "I might be able to build a winner with Jones on the team, so I'll give it a shot, and I won't alienate the broader fanbase in the meantime by trading him for players it doesn't recognize."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But who cares what Buck thinks? He isn't going to be here for the long term. He has never been a guy that sticks around for too long and since 2012 is shot to hell, that leaves him the window of one year and right now, that window is slammed shut that year as well because of the lack of talent.

This team has got to improve that.

In addition its not Bucks job to put a team on the field and it really shouldn't matter what he thinks. I can see taking his opinions and stuff but when it comes to Jones, our success in overhauling the team sort of depends on moving him.

I can see sitting Buck down and gauging his view of certain players and that having weight but him liking Jones shouldn't matter.

All things considered Jones offers much more value in a trade to us than Markakis.

And I love Jones, so nobody give me that crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PA would never allow it.

Anyone who is expecting giant moves made this offseason should be prepared for utter disappointment.

I am sure you're right. I have been pissing and moaning for so long now for a real rebuild and I wonder if I am just as annoying as those expecting us to sing Fielder and every FA under the Sun (and that is a good idea).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Another year of hoping the youngsters do well.

Duquette already said he is targeting ML ready SP via trades. So another year of hoping the youngsters do well is only part of the equation. In order for us to win at all the group has to improve, obviously.

As for Markakis..Im not sure. PA has allowed DD to bring in some of his own guys, and from what I know and have seen so far, I like it. IF PA allows DD to trade Markakis, it would benefit this team greatly.

Think about it. Would you rather have Jones or Markakis? I'll take Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about it. Would you rather have Jones or Markakis? I'll take Jones.

Ditto. Jones has likely yet to reach his peak. Markakis hit his in 2008 and has trended downward since.

I'd rather unload his contract before he becomes Ben Grieve/Alex Rios.

Now that he won a GG, he may be more attractive as a trade chip if the O's eat enough salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
    • Nail hit on head. It really comes down to the offense in the playoffs for us. I think our pitching is good enough overall especially the starters. Shaky sometimes sure, but they can hold their own most of the time. If we don't bring our "A" hitting game in the playoffs we won't go far.
    • The bullpen has warts for sure, but if this offense doesn't figure out how to hit good pitching in the playoffs, the bullpen won't matter. Even I got a little excited when they put 5 and 9 up on the board Tues and Wed, and then it crashed back to reality last night when I remembered they were facing Schmidt and Stroman. When facing a real ace like Cole they were completely shut down. What's gonna happen next week when they face Skubal, Reagins, and/or Lugo? The mediocre bullpen won't matter if they can't figure out how to score some runs off pitchers like that...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...