Jump to content

Ray Ratto: Is Race and Personality affecting coverage of the Ryan Braun story?? (Orioles Related)


Peace21

Recommended Posts

http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/13/is-race-and-personality-affecting-coverage-of-the-ryan-braun-story/

I just got done reading this piece by NBCSports.com's Craig Calcaterra summarizing and pointing out CSN Sports writer Ray Ratto's thoughts on Ryan Braun getting the benefit of the doubt for his PED'S positive test because he is a likable guy and race. I like Calcaterra agree it has nothing to do with race so lets throw that to the side with this topic. I agree with both Calcaterra and Ratto that Braun is getting a pass because he is a good guy and has been a good face for baseball.

Whereas Barry Bonds, who had a bad rap with the press and had a bad attitude, was instantly bombarded with blame for testing positive for steroids. Plus his body changed shape as well from the time he was with the Pirates to when he was with Giants, so that didnt help him in the end.

Calcaterra also points out after David Ortiz tested positive, that he wasn't questioned much on the result and it was swept under the rug because, as Calcaterra puts it, Ortiz is cuddly. Same goes for Andy Petite and in some cases with our very own BROB.

Now I post this on the O's page because I believe this is why Raffy will have a tough time getting into the HOF. The finger waving at congress and stating he never took roids hurt him in the court of public opinion and with voters and the press. Had he not done that and came out and apologized after he was found positive, he mayhave a better shot at getting into the HOF.

Do you agree that personality and being a good guy to the media helps a lot when someone gets nailed for a positive test?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Who, exactly, is giving Braun the benefit of the doubt?

ESPN: Caution advised in Ryan Braun case

According to that article, the head of the union and "those close to Braun" are urging caution and/or think he is innocent. Of course, that doesn't seem out of the ordinary.

However, even on our own forum, you see comments like this:

Originally Posted by yyyyy
Originally Posted by xxxxx

According to the New York Daily News, Braun's original test for PED's was "insanely high, the higest ever or anyone who has ever taken a test, twice the level of the previous highest level ever taken."

That actually makes me more likely to believe he is innocent.

Mind you I still think he did it but something like that certainly makes the chances of a screwup of some kind more likely.

I'm not implying race has anything to do with it, but I don't remember anyone being inclined to believe that there was a mistake involved with any of the other known offenders. That being said, the fact that the test results were apparently very strange most likely has more to do with it than race.

If he does get off the hook somehow, it will look very suspicious considering the racial makeup of those whose appeals fell on deaf ears. Leaking information can cause bad situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who, exactly, is giving Braun the benefit of the doubt?

Nearly all the analysis I've seen has been labeled with plenty of disclaimers that he disputes it and we still need more information.

I don't necessarily think he's "being given the benefit of the doubt", but (moreso than with many stories) enough people want to get more information before condemning him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN: Caution advised in Ryan Braun case

According to that article, the head of the union and "those close to Braun" are urging caution and/or think he is innocent. Of course, that doesn't seem out of the ordinary.

However, even on our own forum, you see comments like this:

I'm not implying race has anything to do with it, but I don't remember anyone being inclined to believe that there was a mistake involved with any of the other known offenders. The fact that the test results were apparently very strange most likely has more to do with it than race.

That being said, if he does get off the hook somehow, it will look very suspicious considering the racial makeup of those who's appeals fell on deaf ears. Leaking information can cause bad situations.

There are always a few naive people who will believe anything they are told. No different here. I would bet if you took a poll it would be 90/10 the most lopsided you will ever get on pretty much any topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not implying race has anything to do with it, but I don't remember anyone being inclined to believe that there was a mistake involved with any of the other known offenders.

The benefit of the doubt is accorded to those who appear to deserve it, regardless of race. Image is everything.. if you enjoy sporting a "Bad Boy" image, you can' then expect the "Good Boy" benefit of the doubt. Doesn't mean you're guilty, just means your image is more easily identified with guilt in that specific circumstance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Braun is Jewish, so I'm throwing out the whole race condition right away when the article doesn't even mention it.

As far as personality goes, I don't think there's any question that how likeable a player is affects media coverage about the player. Obviously it shouldn't make a difference on journalistic standards, but it's simply human nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN: Caution advised in Ryan Braun case

According to that article, the head of the union and "those close to Braun" are urging caution and/or think he is innocent. Of course, that doesn't seem out of the ordinary.

However, even on our own forum, you see comments like this:

I'm not implying race has anything to do with it, but I don't remember anyone being inclined to believe that there was a mistake involved with any of the other known offenders. That being said, the fact that the test results were apparently very strange most likely has more to do with it than race.

If he does get off the hook somehow, it will look very suspicious considering the racial makeup of those whose appeals fell on deaf ears. Leaking information can cause bad situations.

This was no leak. The union said the appropriate words for any accused member. This is not a court of law.

BTW I like being poster xxxxx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure race has exactly zero to do with any of this.

Pretty sure the bigger reason is that Braun is a fan favorite and not a jackass.

Jackasses tend to look worse in the media because people don't like them. See Aroid, ManRam, Palmeiro, McGwire, Sosa, CLEMENS......... race has nothing to do with it. Jackass-ness has everything to do with it.

Those six guys i just listed are like Joseph's Technicolor Dreamcoat of Jackasses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having followed the story, it has occurred to me that the personality business was code for race. I don't remember Braun saving any infants from burning buildings. That said, reporters opinions and biases toward and against players have always colored their coverage of the player, however imperceptively. To suggest that it doesn't is to suggest that the media is not human.

The coverage has definitely been more pro-player than any other PED case I can remember but that could just mean that Braun has a great PR team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • First of all, I was referring to Mateo as the sub 600 guy. And you can trade Mullins if you have a real replacement for him. This organization does not currently have a replacement for him.
    • We are all aware that there are no sure things. I don’t think that needs to be stated, whether it’s going to the young players or keeping the vets.  That is obvious. That being said, we have Holliday, Mayo, Cowser and Kjerstad who are, by most rankings, all top 30 guys and they are all performing at a high level and ready to be here or, at the very least, very close. And this doesn’t include Ortiz, who has been a consensus top 75 guy. Plus you have Norby and Stowers. All of them are ready. You aren’t going to have that level of talent and let it go to waste. It’s just not happening. 
    • I thought the idea was to trade guys while they still had value (before the crash) and fill that position with a cheaper version? You are speculating that Mullins would of hit better if he wasn't injured.  All I'm saying is this is 2 years in a row with stats showing a downward trend so if it happens again next season you have a player that won't be worth a bag of balls at the end of next season because it will be assumed his skillset is fading.  We basically got Hicks off the street because he couldn't stay healthy and his production had completely fallen off. Also, you make a statement that Cowser is a sub .600 player so does that mean you don't make plans for him next season?  Of course you need a fall back option but I thought you are always all for making sure the young guys get opportunity. We do agree that Cowser isn't a natural center fielder but in my scenario you would have a defensive minded backup, be it Hicks, Mckenna or someone else.  If Cowser doesn't hit enough to make up for lack of range then we definitely want to have someone on the roster who can play top notch D to fall back on. You can't predict development.  I know I didn't expect Gunner to look this good at short and honestly Westburg has been way better than I thought we would see based off of scouting reports.  
    • Easily Texas.  They really didn’t play well after May.  They went 55-52 from June 1 on.  Tampa’s been neck and neck with us for months.  
    • Here's just my "feel", admittedly not based on more than the little I know.. rather the vibe I get watching the games. Hays, Hicks, O'hearn, Henderson, Mountcastle, Rushman, Mccann are all the solid basis for the team - they hit, they field, they're all arounders; if one or two of them don't show up, the others typically do. I don't know the stories behind why they would stay or why they would not, BUT if I'm the manager, I'm wanting to hold onto that core if possible. Mullins is an awesome fielder (and a highlight reel of his wall catches is one of the reasons I chose to become an Orioles fan) but I'm not certain what the team offers him other than maintaining where he's at. It seems he's added in as a "addition" to something that's taking place rather than being part of the core of that something itself. And honestly, he plays like it. Sometimes the all-star and then long bouts of meh. I gotta think that on a career basis he's looking for what will take him to the next level. Santander... I just don't feel that he would choose to stay. He's cool, he hits like a madman (when he doesn't strike out) but I think he's got other places to go on his trip to stardom. I think that Baltimore is a stepping stone for him. Mateo, Urias, Kjerstad ... well, each one of them makes me nervous when it's their time at bat and they HAVE to get a hit. Don't get me wrong, obviously you can't play at this level unless your very good, and each of them can get a hit... but I feel it's a bit more Vegas odds whether they do. Urias? (who?) he seems to come in and then disappear again without notice or wrinkle. Mateo, guy can steal a base like no-ones business, and has hit a few clutch hits, but again.. small namer. Kjerstad? Young and promising. (does anyone ever get over myocarditis?) If I had to choose between the three, I guess I'd be between keeping a proven moderate Mateo or betting on a potential up and comer Kjerstad. 
    • Last year... https://www.sportingnews.com/us/mlb/news/mlb-playoff-schedule-2022-tv-channels-alds-nlds/m4cg6klkhlw24hqykj2vgmvq National League Division Series 2022 schedule All times are Eastern and are subject to change given results of other series. Date Game Start time (ET) TV channel Result Tue., Oct. 11 Phillies at Braves, Game 1 1:07 p.m. Fox  
    • The reality is, we don’t know if they will contribute as much or more than the guys they would replace, or whether they’ll be significant downgrades.  There’s significant risk involved, especially when you’re talking about a team that’s winning with the personnel it already has.  If this was the 2021 offseason, decisions like this would be easy.   That paragraph might sound like I’m advocating standing pat.  I’m not.  I’m just saying these decisions aren’t simple.  Our evaluators have a lot of tricky decisions to make.  I’ll say this: I’m not making any moves yet based on what guys like Beavers, Fabian or Bradfield might do in 2-3 years.  None of those guys have a better than 50/50 chance to be better than our current outfielders at this stage.   Ask me again in a year and maybe I’ll feel differently.    
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...