Jump to content

For those who said Latos would not be traded this offseason...


andrewrickli

Recommended Posts

Reds acquire SD?s Mat Latos for Yonder Alonso, Brad Boxberger, Yasmani Grandal and Edinson Volquez.

https://twitter.com/#!/Reds/status/148108060370546688

Great deal for the Padres, holy crap! They got Volquez who they can slot into their rotation to replace Latos. Alonso can play left or be dealt for Wade Davis if the rumors were true. I think that I would keep that entire package unless I am blown away for Alonso.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Holy *#&$!!!!

The A's have to be KILLING themselves for not giving up Gonzalez for that package. That may be the most lopsided trade since Glenn Davis.

The Reds would have been MUCH better off dealing Alonso for Guthrie straight up, and then still could have dealt Volquez, Grandal and Boxberger for Gonzalez.

Eeesh. Talk about going for broke. One SP is not going to win them a WS, and now they have no talent coming through for a couple years.

The Reds still have one of the best catching prospects in the minors, as well as a great SS/2B prospect in Hamilton. Both guys are top-40'ish prospects IMO so there is still some young talent on the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Reds still have one of the best catching prospects in the minors, as well as a great SS/2B prospect in Hamilton. Both guys are top-40'ish prospects IMO so there is still some young talent on the way.

No where near enough. I get that Latos is under control for 4 more years, but 3 of those guys they had under control for 6 years, and you could have gotten Gonzalez and another SP for that haul easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy *#&$!!!!

The A's have to be KILLING themselves for not giving up Gonzalez for that package. That may be the most lopsided trade since Glenn Davis.

The Reds would have been MUCH better off dealing Alonso for Guthrie straight up, and then still could have dealt Volquez, Grandal and Boxberger for Gonzalez.

Eeesh. Talk about going for broke. One SP is not going to win them a WS, and now they have no talent coming through for a couple years.

Especially when you give up another starter!!! They gave up a lot more than what the M's gave us for Bedard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Especially when you give up another starter!!! They gave up a lot more than what the M's gave us for Bedard.

Yeah they did. That's what you call an offer you can't refuse, but all they did was replace Volquez with Latos, and give up 3 top prospects. That's treading water.

For equivalence sake, it'd be something like us trading Guthrie, Machado, Schoop and Klein.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't say I like this trade from the Padres point of view. The only difference-making talent they got back here is Grandal in my opinion.

It's not an awful trade, but I'd want at least two elite-ish prospects if I were going to trade a young ace...

I'd actually put Grandal at 4th on the list.

Boxberger could be a closer easily.

Volquez is a #3 starter and will be better than that in SD.

Alonso will outhit Grandal and they both play similar levels of D.

Grandal I don't think will stick behind the plate and will end up without a position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No where near enough. I get that Latos is under control for 4 more years, but 3 of those guys they had under control for 6 years, and you could have gotten Gonzalez and another SP for that haul easy.

It was a terrible trade by the Reds. They gave up way too much young and controlled talent. Latos does not make them better than the players that they gave up would/could have IMO. I think it is more than what the Orioles got for Bedard as well. I can see Alonso being flipped for one of the Rays pitchers as well, but the Orioles might want to make a phone call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they did. That's what you call an offer you can't refuse, but all they did was replace Volquez with Latos, and give up 3 top prospects. That's treading water.

For equivalence sake, it'd be something like us trading Guthrie, Machado, Schoop and Klein.

Eh, I think it's more like Machado, Chris Davis, Dan Klein, and Daniel Cabrera in my opinion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a terrible trade by the Reds. They gave up way too much young and controlled talent. Latos does not make them better than the players that they gave up would/could have IMO. I think it is more than what the Orioles got for Bedard as well. I can see Alonso being flipped for one of the Rays pitchers as well, but the Orioles might want to make a phone call.

I hear Rizzo is the one they are trying to move, but I'm thinking they'll take the best return they can get for whoever and just roll with it. The O's should be all over it, but somehow I don't see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Honestly, this almost feels like a positive. Last year an outing like this might have had 4 or 5 walks. Hopefully this indicates a better ability to grind out a start without his best command. 
    • Yea that’s a lot of pitching.  Only 1 walk but the str% was just under 60%.
    • A few ideas:  McKenna has been around for a long time, Roch probably knows him pretty well.   Maybe he likes the guy.  It is a fact that Hyde (and likely Elias too) like to have a good mix of RH and LH bats, and take LH/RH splits very seriously.    We see it in their lineups, and in player moves, all the time.   It is clear based on the multitude of comments that come out each time a lineup is posted, that Hyde/Elias put a lot more stock in LH/RH splits than the majority of fans here do.   Whether you agree with them or not, the bottom line is it DOES matter to THEM, a lot.   And with Hays down, and now Burdick gone, our MLB/AAA pool of potential outfielders is VERY lefthanded, which means that McKenna probably has more value to them than he does in most our minds.   And Roch is just reflecting that value in his blog.   (When Hays got hurt, I wasn't 100% sure his replacement was going to be Kjerstad, I thought there was a chance, based on past behavior of Elias/Hyde, that it could be McKenna to get another RH bat in the mix). Perhaps Cowser has, or will, convince them that he can be an adequate backup CF if something happens to Mullins.   I don't know if that has happened yet.   But with Hays out, and Mateo so far not passing the eye test as a CF, it's possible that McKenna is still the #1 answer if something were to happen to Cedric.   Which gives him more significance than some other 4A guy who can be DFA'd 3 times in a season like Banuelos and pass through waivers or be easily replaced.
    • We smashed him pretty good last year and he’s due for regression. He’s an average pitcher that we should beat. 
    • Yeah, the limited IP so far is small.  But it feels like he's not at the right level of competition. Of course it's also as much competing against himself (pitch shape, location, etc. that the team tracks) as against the hitters too.  Like you mentioned elsewhere, he's younger than DeLeon.
    • I think they’d go with 4 lefties before sending Akin to AAA. If everyone is healthy: SP: Burnes, Grayson, Bradish, Kremer, Means/Irvin RP: Kimbrel, Cano, Coulombe, Perez, Akin, Suárez, Webb/Baumann, Irvin/Means Option: Wells, Tate DFA: Ramirez, Baumann/Webb And then if they want Wells, they either DFA the other of Webb/Baumann or option Akin.  They also have the ability to option Kremer, but he’s really have to pitch poorly for that to happen.
    • With Cowser hitting lefties ok so far, not a lot of reason for McKenna. Mateo has already played CF once as well, so they are covered down with defense in CF and Kjerstad brings a much better bat. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...