Jump to content

For those who said Latos would not be traded this offseason...


andrewrickli

Recommended Posts

I hear Rizzo is the one they are trying to move, but I'm thinking they'll take the best return they can get for whoever and just roll with it. The O's should be all over it, but somehow I don't see it happening.

You have to think the Pads would want Matusz. But would you deal BMat for either of the 3 first baseman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You have to think the Pads would want Matusz. But would you deal BMat for either of the 3 first baseman?

BMat for Alonso and Boxberger at least. I think SD is a perfect fit for Matusz, and Alonso would be best suited for an AL team with a hole at 1B and a short fence.

It's a good match, but Matusz has more upside than Alonso I think, so you have to figure out how to balance things. I really think Boxberger could be a closer, or at least a good set-up man, which would enable us to experiment with JJ in the rotation or deal him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BMat for Alonso and Boxberger at least. I think SD is a perfect fit for Matusz, and Alonso would be best suited for an AL team with a hole at 1B and a short fence.

It's a good match, but Matusz has more upside than Alonso I think, so you have to figure out how to balance things. I really think Boxberger could be a closer, or at least a good set-up man, which would enable us to experiment with JJ in the rotation or deal him.

Some people might not agree, but Matusz is a guy I would deal if I could bring back a decent haul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, is there any way a 3 team deal could be worked out, where some cheaper players are sent to the Pads and we can acquire one of these first baseman using guys like Guthrie?

I would also think that Johnson would be someone SD would be interested in.

I don't think Guthrie has any appeal for SD anymore, because they are obviously going younger now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice haul for the Padres. I am sure one of those first basemen will be available for the right package. If the O's think they can get Matusz right they should keep him though, pitching is a greater priority at this moment and if he bounces back his value will only climb. Tough call but would say no unless you can pull a deal that does not weaken what i consider to be a pretty weak pitching staff already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd actually put Grandal at 4th on the list.

Boxberger could be a closer easily.

Volquez is a #3 starter and will be better than that in SD.

Alonso will outhit Grandal and they both play similar levels of D.

Grandal I don't think will stick behind the plate and will end up without a position.

Really? I know Grandal's defense is shaky but I don't think he ends up needing to move to another position. The arm is good and he's pretty athletic. Even if he doesn't improve (and I don't really expect that he will) I think his bat is good enough that you can put up with it.

As for the others, Boxberger is good but still just a reliever. Alonso is a pretty mediocre first base prospect in my opinion - I think his upside is pretty much Adam Laroche, which isn't bad, but I don't see anything about him that I like better than Jesus Guzman. And I don't like Volquez at all - he's got major command problems and a really poor attitude to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right...That's why we need to use him to go to another team and then send those players for Alonso, Rizzo or Blanks.

I think the Alonso dream has been squashed for now. Tampa can beat anything we try to put out there for a package and will get one of the two of Alonso or Rizzo if they want to deal Davis or Niemann.

There are no good, young ML ready 1B men out on the trade block any longer that the Orioles can realistically acquire...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I know Grandal's defense is shaky but I don't think he ends up needing to move to another position. The arm is good and he's pretty athletic. Even if he doesn't improve (and I don't really expect that he will) I think his bat is good enough that you can put up with it.

As for the others, Boxberger is good but still just a reliever. Alonso is a pretty mediocre first base prospect in my opinion - I think his upside is pretty much Adam Laroche, which isn't bad, but I don't see anything about him that I like better than Jesus Guzman. And I don't like Volquez at all - he's got major command problems and a really poor attitude to boot.

Grandal's bat is ok, but even at the draft people expected him to move to 1B because his C game is weak, and that's not a place you want a weak defensive player. I don't even think it's as elite as people make it out to be. Alonso is MUCH better with the bat than he is (think .325 hitter with 20-30 HR). Boxberger I was a fan of at USC, he's a RP, no doubt, BUT he's got the stuff to be a closer, and I think he will be. Volquez has had issues giving up HR in CIN, but in SD in a pitchers park, I think you'll see him bounce back strong. Keep in mind he had that nasty injury that made his control all out of whack before he finally shut down and had the surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Certainly hard to sit O'Hearn with the way he's been hitting against righties. But Kjerstad doesn't have major split issues so he may be able to take some of those lefty PAs.
    • This team is good enough to win with Holliday, Norby, or Urias at 2B. I think the thought of staying with Holliday is that he has the highest ceiling by far of the 3. And if you can get him going so that by the end of the season he is ready for "take off", he gives you that one additional weapon that Norby nor Urias are. IMO, there are several issues with turning to Norby to replace Holliday now.  1) He has no long term place on this team. So you are in effect starting his Major League clock unnecessarily, when he most likely has more value to another org if he stays at AAA and can start his MLB clock on their choosing. 2) What if he struggles? Then what? Do you turn back to Holliday? If he struggles, it may damage his trade value. 3) What if Holliday regains his stroke at AAA? What do you do then even if Norby has managed to do a decent job or even a good job? Do you keep Holliday for the rest of the year? 4) And to me this is the biggest - What is the best use of his value? To be a bench player here long term? Or to be part of a trade that brings the Major League team something that it needs (in the pitching department)?
    • Agree with you that Mayo is special, and that if I were going to be on one of our players being an impact, middle of the order bat, it's him (though if Cowser and Westburg continue to hit anything like this we'll have a few of them! And I'm a big believer in Kjerstad's bat too). I don't think it's really that complicated, though, no? Santander will leave next season and Kjerstad takes that place. Trade Mountcastle and that's Mayo's spot. Basallo is still a ways off and things will probably work themselves out with injury or what not by then. Norby, Stowers, and Ortiz were always going to be the three that it was going to really be a struggle to find a spot for, and the Ortiz trade solved the Ortiz issue, and now I think you're in a situation where, barring injury, Stowers probably ought to be trade bait and Norby could become a really valuable 12th hitter off the bench next season. 
    • I'm pretty much in agreement with SG on this one. I don't know if he should be sent down, but as SG said, “That's where I trust Elias.” I disagree a little bit on the “hurting his confidence” issue. I think hitting a baseball successfully is a lot like hitting a golf ball successfully… a lot of what impacts your success is what you have going on between your ears. While there's a danger in hurting his confidence by sending him out there every day while he's in a sustained slump, there's also a danger in sending him down to Norfolk. But, once again, I have to trust Elias and management on making that call. 
    • I was dead wrong on this -- i thought for sure it would be McKenna. Kjerstad is obviously deserving of it and happy for the kid. If Hyde is gonna try and get him in the line up regularly its gonna come at the expense of someone else. Who is that? Maybe Mountcastle's knee is worse than they are telling us. Either way, what happens when Hays gets healthy? I'm sure they are operating on the "things always work themselves out" theory. Long term, this org really needs to develop or trade for a power hitting RH bat that plays the OF/1B. Looking forward to see how this works out.
    • Yeah, I agree. It makes sense for them to do now while Hays is injured and they can figure it out, especially since Mountcastle is dealing with his knee injury. When Hays comes back though, I don’t know what they’ll do if there’s no other injuries. Somebody has to be the odd one out and I don’t see them DFA’ing Urias or Mateo. Possibly that could be their excuse to send down Holliday for a reset/service time if they think his chance at ROY is shot, but the bench composition works a lot better with the additional infielder. Anyway I hope Kjerstad rakes in the opportunities he gets now and makes it interesting. 
    • I didn't realize Heston had gotten to 10 home runs already this season.  That's wild stuff. I think this spells a little more bench time for Mounty, deserved or not.  VS RHP we'll see a little more O'hearn at 1B w/ Heston at DH.  If they want Mount in there then they'll sit Tony Taters every once in a while and either Heston or O'hearn can play RF.  Imagine Santander's switch hitting bat on the bench late - quite a weapon! All the talk about who gets starts where, but what this really does is makes the bench a true weapon that managers will have to think about when making pitching changes.  You sure you want to bring in that LHP in the 7th to face O'hearn?  OK, here's Mountcastle to take his place at 1B seamlessly and mash.   You sure you to want to bring in a RHP to face McCann?  OK we can bring in Heston and still have O'hearn for later, or vice-versa.  Its wild, its versatile, and it packs a real punch late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...