Jump to content

If Santana goes to the Yankee$...


Mad Mark

Recommended Posts

Erik Bedard

Kevin Millar/Jay Payton

Chad Bradford

(mid/low-level prospect)

for

SP Clay Buchholz, 23 (ML)

SP Justin Masterson, 22 (AA)

RP Craig Hansen, 24 (AAA)

OF Ryan Kalish, 19 (Mid A)

2B/SS Jed Lowrie, 23 (AAA)

1B Chris Carter, 25 (AAA)

or

SP Clay Buchholz, 23 (ML)

SP Justin Masterson, 22 (AA)

RP Craig Hansen, 24 (AAA)

1B Lars Anderson, 20 (High A)

OF Ryan Kalish, 19 (Mid A)

SS/3B Will Middlebrooks, 19 (Low A)

or

1B/3B Kevin Youkilis

SP Justin Masterson, 22 (AA)

RP Craig Hansen, 24 (AAA)

OF Ryan Kalish, 19 (Mid A)

2B/SS Jed Lowrie, 23 (AAA)

SS/3B Will Middlebrooks, 19 (Low A)

That's a lot of players :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I would not deal Bedard in-division, period. Packages are great and all, but there are some lines you do not cross.

Much like you still go out and play hard even if it may cost you the #1 draft pick and gain you nothing, it's simply wrong to give a division rival their ace for the next couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is absurd...The Yankees and Red Sox could put together great packages for Bedard. You could make the argument that trading Bedard to one of them is better than anything else because we will be taking away from their top young players that they could use for the next 6-10 years.

Even though my head says that it makes sense to trade Bedard to Boston or NY if the price is right, the idea really hurts my heart. I just can't stand the idea of Erik pitching for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in favor of dealing Bedard to wherever the best return comes from. This franchise can't worry about what other teams do. We need talent...bad. Let's worry about getting as much as we can now, and not worry about what other teams in our division do. If we could get a package centered around Bucholz, I'd be all for dealing him to Beantown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Boston offered the Twins Crisp, Bucholtz, and Youkilis, I bet they'd have a hard time turning it down. Sure beats MelCab and Kennedy/Hughes. Then we could trade them Millar for a 1B stop gap until they can sign Tiex.:D

Don't you know Tex is coming here? He went to HS here, so he's definitely going to be an Oriole.

That Boston deal certainly beats whatever the Yanks are offering. I'd be surprised if Boston doesn't start offering Clay just to out-bid the Yanks. I bet they really want to make sure that Johan doesn't end up in pin stripes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have watched the YES network with Mike and the Mad Dog for the past 3 years or so and I have come to the conclusion that Hughes and Joba are untouchable.

No team is going to give a lot up without giving Bedard an Extension.

I don't remember much of the Moose situtation, but he was left after his prime years. (31ish). Plus he did improve the Yankees.

The Yankees won multiple World Championships in the 90's. They have NOT won since Moose signed there. Therefore, he did NOT "improve the Yankees." Don't get me wrong, he is (was) a great pitcher, but you cannot make a statement like you did because its just not true.

As for Bedard (or anyone else not named Markakis) we are in rebuilding mode. We do not plan on winnning in the next year or two, so you trade him to WHOEVER is giving the best package, whether that be the Dodgers, Mets, or even the dreaded Sox or Yankees!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though my head says that it makes sense to trade Bedard to Boston or NY if the price is right, the idea really hurts my heart. I just can't stand the idea of Erik pitching for them.

Due to Bedard's stand-offish attitude, its been hard to really love thr guy like a true Orioles great. It wouldn't take me long to absolutely hate him if he pitched for the Red Sox or Yankees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the biting sarcasm. I almost can't wait until Tex signs elsewhere so everyone can get over him, to put it nicely.

Man it's been awhile since we've talked about Tex... :D

You know, you could see the Dodgers deal Loney and sign Teixeira next year, especially with Mattingly there as the HC. Nomar would play 1B for them in the interim. Just a thought...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man it's been awhile since we've talked about Tex... :D

You know, you could see the Dodgers deal Loney and sign Teixeira next year, especially with Mattingly there as the HC. Nomar would play 1B for them in the interim. Just a thought...

From what I understand, the Braves don't have any intention of letting Tex go anytime soon.

I just find it funny that almost an entire message board can pin their hopes and dreams of the future of a franchise on someone who's been anywhere from 3-4 years away from free agency....just because he grew up in the area. It's not like a LOT could happen in that time frame. I guess when you're looking through orange tinted glasses, he'll be going into the HoF as an Oriole.

Pardon my ire, but I'm just not in the best mood after this mornings events...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Yankees won multiple World Championships in the 90's. They have NOT won since Moose signed there. Therefore, he did NOT "improve the Yankees." Don't get me wrong, he is (was) a great pitcher, but you cannot make a statement like you did because its just not true.

As for Bedard (or anyone else not named Markakis) we are in rebuilding mode. We do not plan on winnning in the next year or two, so you trade him to WHOEVER is giving the best package, whether that be the Dodgers, Mets, or even the dreaded Sox or Yankees!

Moose had one of his best years the year he signed with them. So he did improve the Yankees. The Yankees were generally the best team going into the Playoffs. Playoffs are a roll of the dice, and they haven't one the big one yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not deal Bedard in-division, period. Packages are great and all, but there are some lines you do not cross.

Much like you still go out and play hard even if it may cost you the #1 draft pick and gain you nothing, it's simply wrong to give a division rival their ace for the next couple years.

Like winning? That is a line we haven't crossed in years.

But hey, why let that get in the way of improving the team the best possible way you can. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There are no answers, only Zuul. But seriously, I think the issue at play here is we look at the body of work of guys like Eloy, Slater, O'Hearn, Rivera, and (to a lesser extent) Soto, you see where the holes are. I get that O'Hearn was thrust into 1B near FT due to the Mountcastle injury, but that didn't explain Hyde from playing O'Hearn in the OF when he is one of the worst defensive OFers on this team. Right now, this team is very much ailing. Ramon coming back will definitely help spell the need for O'Hearn to be a 1B by maybe letting Rivera play over there.  We need to get back to a point where O'Hearn is only hitting against righties and is playing sparingly in the field. Eloy is a liability at this point. I was a proponent of seeing what mechanical tweaks they could make similar to what they did w/ Hicks (and even O'Hearn!) and they did catch lightning in a bottle maybe due to excitement/adrenaline and BABIP being unsustainably high, but right now his flyballs aren't carrying and his groundballs aren't finding holes, so there's probably a reason why Chicago is saying, "Haha, told you so!" This team is in freefall offensively, at this point...just give the ABs to Mayo. You can't simultaneously say, "He needs to make adjustments!" and then let him have 5 ABs over 5 games. That isn't a way to grow a player. Not everybody can be a part time player and be effective off the bench/sparingly. Kjerstad has shown an ability to hit lefties in the minors as well as in the majors (albeit in very limited time, he his 4 for 10 against them). Let the kid play. Slater has fallen off a cliff, but at least he's a solid defensive OFer I get it, nobody is going to solve the offensive woes of this team when it comes to the rookies/young guys. Mayo, Holliday, Kjerstad, even Cowser...they're all still adjusting. The change needs to come from the main stays. Now, Adley is starting to hit, Gunnar is back on a hitting binge, but this lineup desperately needs some consistent production from Tony to go along with it because right now way too much pressure is being put on the bottom of the lineup and the young guys. And I'm not convinced Westy solves any of those issues as wrist injuries are a beast to bounceback from quickly.   
    • I get the desire to poo-poo analytics and advanced data, etc.  It does get obnoxious hearing about statcast pages in red when guys aren't hitting well.   But more obnoxious are cries of "the old eye test" and "old school" and the other various "yelling at cloud" types of arguments.  If everyone was stuck with the way things were done back in the day, we'd never progress and never advance in any area of life or society.  That includes how we look at and discuss baseball.
    • If the above is true, how do you get a team to deliver timely hits, stop pressing, and quite expecting to lose?  
    • I'm not sure if I'd go as far to say as Norby is a bad baseball player.   My post was a bit tongue in cheek.  Like, I'm not ready to give up on Trevor Rogers even though admittedly he's been terrible since he got here.  A lot of people were acting like we gave up Steve Finley 2.0 after Norby went on a heater when he arrived in Miami.  It was absolutely silly to think that way, just like it's silly to point to his recent cooldown as a sign of who he is, too. Much like the book hasn't been finished on the player Trevor Rogers will be, the book also hasn't been finished on who Norby will be, either.  I understand your criticism of him and I think it's valid to a degree but it also ignores the idea of any upside he has.   
    • 440 ML players have 100+ PAs this year. Norby is 404/440 in Exit Velocity and coincidentally 404/440 in Contact% So he doesn't put his bat on the ball and when he does, he doesn't hit it hard. Which (unlike Holliday and Mayo) is completely in line with his poor Exit Velocity and Contact% in AAA. He's not a good defender either. Norby is a bad baseball player and we're better off with Livan Soto and Emmanuel Rivera.
    • Norby has been coming back down to earth. He's 2-23 with 10 Ks and no extra base hits over the past week. OPS has dropped over 100 points. Currently .784
    • It was a great trade!! 🤣
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...