Jump to content

Orioles are talking to Saunders


33rdst

Recommended Posts

I say sign up Saunders to be a #2, Hunter #3, and let Arrieta and Britton sit in #4 and #5 to find out if Matusz and Tillman want to be serious about baseball. If any of the top three are pitching well, move them for some prospects. Depth can't hurt us. We're always scraping the barrel by August.
Just to quote this again... Never seen it described so well.

Personally, I think it is totally presumptuous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm okay with signing Joe Saunders but still expect a trade for Floyd. Floyd #1, Saunders #2, Wada #3 and Britton #4 and Arrieta #5. Guthrie will be traded to the Angels for Bourjos after Jones is dealt in the Sox deal for Floyd and Quentin. Big changes coming. Fielder? Still possible. No....I was not up all night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that if Saunders will come here and still alot of teams are in on him since you don't have to give up playersThis would set up the domino affect of other moves that have been mentioned. We could have two guys pitching who were O's fans or perhaps none. DD said it was about improving the pitching. I don't think he wants to wait for the young guys to perhaps improve.That did not work out last year . Fielder is still possible but I don't think the O's go over seven years.Nats,O's,Rangers and Blue Jays. Alot of people think Fielder will go to an American League team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure people are paying enough attention to the contract situations of our manger and GM. With Buck only having two years left and DD having just three, I think the focus at the major league level is on winning . The young pitchers are on a much shorter leash this year. DD is bringing in guys who have shown that they can throw strikes and get batters out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the big man is going to cost 20 million a year,why not take 5M and sign Scott,8M and sign Madison,and 7M and sign Saunders and the flip some of the cavalry fo other teams for prospects to built up the farm.Best of both worlds,better major league team and with better players at AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the big man is going to cost 20 million a year,why not take 5M and sign Scott,8M and sign Madison,and 7M and sign Saunders and the flip some of the cavalry fo other teams for prospects to built up the farm.Best of both worlds,better major league team and with better players at AAA.

Because that's what they try every year. You could just as easily have said: "If Beltre will cost 20M, why not give 5M to Gregg, 8M to Vlad and 7M to Lee?" This is what the O's always try to do and it NEVER WORKS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the big man is going to cost 20 million a year,why not take 5M and sign Scott,8M and sign Madison,and 7M and sign Saunders and the flip some of the cavalry fo other teams for prospects to built up the farm.Best of both worlds,better major league team and with better players at AAA.

Why not sign Fielder for $20MM and Trade some of the calvary for prospects/pitching. Best of both worlds,better major league team and with better players at AAA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he could do very nicely here. Good K/BB and GB/FB numbers and he's a workhorse. The only big knock is whether is numbers will translate well from the NL West to the AL East. To that I say: He's better than Dana Eveland. With him, our rotation of Guts, Saunders, Britton, Arrieta, Wada is only bad with the potential to be okay, not horrifically horrendous with no potential like it was last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the big man is going to cost 20 million a year,why not take 5M and sign Scott,8M and sign Madison,and 7M and sign Saunders and the flip some of the cavalry fo other teams for prospects to built up the farm.Best of both worlds,better major league team and with better players at AAA.

The O's would be silly to bring back Scott. He's far too streaky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...