Jump to content

Our pitchers are all with Brady


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Do you really know that? I love Reimold and if the Orioles were to have let him go, his career would not have been over. He quite possibly could have gotten more at bats with a different team and it might have been the best thing for his career. The point of my post was that there is no proof that Brady has added anything to a players performance YET. You have not proven otherwise. I just think we need to lighten up on Brady the savior, until we get some results. There are a million trainers that can get anyone in better shape. But does it translate to being a better player.

I am pretty sure that when dealing with athletic endeavors, it if far better to be in shape then not be in shape.

I think that the main advantage Brady has over other trainers is that he was at one point a very successful professional ballplayer so not only does he have expertise in which exercises translate best to baseball he also has a built in respect factor that other trainers do not have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure that when dealing with athletic endeavors, it if far better to be in shape then not be in shape.

I think that the main advantage Brady has over other trainers is that he was at one point a very successful professional ballplayer so not only does he have expertise in which exercises translate best to baseball he also has a built in respect factor that other trainers do not have.

You are probably correct. However, we have no positive results. The OP was about the Orioles pitchers being with Brady. Then a chorus of " thats good" posts. Im just not sure everyone should be so Gung ho. BTW, Brady was not a pitcher. So, im not so sure how much he knows about what is best for them. Call me a skeptic, but id take it slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So really no one so far. Reimold was better in 09' then last year, as 10' was a lost year. Bell was no better although lost some weight. Reynolds actual blames some of his fielding woes on lifting. Im all for getting guys in better condition, however, this board seems to think that Brady is some kind of savior. I am reserving judgement until i see some results.

I think that is perfectly fair.

I should mention, Brady said that one of the first guys to work with him was Jerry Hairston, after two years in which he hit sub-.200 (actually, .206 and .189). The next year he hit .326. That was when Brady got interested in working with more players.

With the hitters, he does more than just fitness training, he works on their swings, as well. Obviously, he's not telling the pitchers how to pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://mlb.sbnation.com/2012/1/23/2727678/brian-matusz-2012-comeback

Hall of Famer Brady Anderson, making his first appearance since being appointed special assistant to executive vice president of baseball operations Dan Duquette, said today at FanFest that the difference between Brian Matusz a year ago at this time and Brian Matusz today is the difference between night and day. "He's like a different human as far as his mentality and his dedication and the raw numbers, what type of athlete he is, he's not the same,'' Anderson said of the left-hander. By most accounts, Matusz arrived at spring training last year in less than optimum condition and started the season on the disabled list with an intercostal strain. He never really recovered and ended up back in the minor leagues for part of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://mlb.sbnation.com/2012/1/23/2727678/brian-matusz-2012-comeback

Hall of Famer Brady Anderson, making his first appearance since being appointed special assistant to executive vice president of baseball operations Dan Duquette, said today at FanFest that the difference between Brian Matusz a year ago at this time and Brian Matusz today is the difference between night and day. "He's like a different human as far as his mentality and his dedication and the raw numbers, what type of athlete he is, he's not the same,'' Anderson said of the left-hander. By most accounts, Matusz arrived at spring training last year in less than optimum condition and started the season on the disabled list with an intercostal strain. He never really recovered and ended up back in the minor leagues for part of the season.

All great, but will he have the feel for the curve ball and change-up that he had in 2009-10? In addition to his physical condition last year, he also just flat-out didnt locate his stuff very well at all. Brady can't really help him with that part of it, and to me, it's probably the most significant part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All great, but will he have the feel for the curve ball and change-up that he had in 2009-10? In addition to his physical condition last year, he also just flat-out didnt locate his stuff very well at all. Brady can't really help him with that part of it, and to me, it's probably the most significant part.

Indeed. All good questions. But hope springs eternal ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All great, but will he have the feel for the curve ball and change-up that he had in 2009-10? In addition to his physical condition last year, he also just flat-out didnt locate his stuff very well at all. Brady can't really help him with that part of it, and to me, it's probably the most significant part.

He'd also lost 5 mph off his FB. Will Brady's conditioning help with that? I've never been a pitcher but it seems like this would be helped more by training for explosiveness than the feel for his curve and change-up. I guess that I could really stretch things and speculate that his control and location might improve if his conditioning allows him to improve the repeatability of his delivery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'd also lost 5 mph off his FB. Will Brady's conditioning help with that? I've never been a pitcher but it seems like this would be helped more by training for explosiveness than the feel for his curve and change-up. I guess that I could really stretch things and speculate that his control and location might improve if his conditioning allows him to improve the repeatability of his delivery.

Yes, I think Brady's conditioning should help with velocity. But most of his velocity had returned when he came back to the team in late August, and he still stunk, because he didn't have a feel for his pitches. That's my point. I am not worried at all that Matusz won't be in good shape, and won't throw hard enough. I am worried whether he can regain his feel and command of the offspeed stuff and also regain his confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure that when dealing with athletic endeavors, it if far better to be in shape then not be in shape.

I think that the main advantage Brady has over other trainers is that he was at one point a very successful professional ballplayer so not only does he have expertise in which exercises translate best to baseball he also has a built in respect factor that other trainers do not have.

Not to mention serious contacts. COMPLETELY random scenario... "Hey Nomar... can you come out here for a few days and talk to a guy for me?" Insert any other name here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...