Jump to content

Our pitchers are all with Brady


weams

Recommended Posts

Yes, I think Brady's conditioning should help with velocity. But most of his velocity had returned when he came back to the team in late August, and he still stunk, because he didn't have a feel for his pitches. That's my point. I am not worried at all that Matusz won't be in good shape, and won't throw hard enough. I am worried whether he can regain his feel and command of the offspeed stuff and also regain his confidence.

Like I said in the post above... Brady and his contacts will win the day.

He had Palmer out there talking to (assuming) ALL the guys, but especially the pitchers. Think about it...

Palmer, Like first half of January, flying 3000 miles to Irvine to talk to ... I can't even remember all the names. Matusz, Tillman, Hunter, ... Pierce, Sacko and Vanzetti.

Is even The Mighty Boras going to get Palmer to do that? Doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Like I said in the post above... Brady and his contacts will win the day.

He had Palmer out there talking to (assuming) ALL the guys, but especially the pitchers. Think about it...

Palmer, Like first half of January, flying 3000 miles to Irvine to talk to ... I can't even remember all the names. Matusz, Tillman, Hunter, ... Pierce, Sacko and Vanzetti.

Is even The Mighty Boras going to get Palmer to do that? Doubt it.

Obviously, Palmer has wanted to be involved and Brady understands the value of his knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

BRADY ANDERSON

[on working with Matusz] ?He came to me toward the end of last season, so it began as far as building his strength back up. It was before he went down on a few of his triple-a starts. We just started with the basics, getting his strength numbers up. And we did. As hard as we trained athletes need to understand that training never ends. It?s a continuous climb upwards in terms of strength and power.

That?s one thing Brian never had a problem with: he knew how to pitch by the time he came into the league. Maybe that was a little bit of a ?I wouldn?t say curse?but he just never experienced failure. And that?s hard. The first time it?s a little bit of a shock.?

[on sensing a determination to put last year behind him] ?Until you really rid yourself of that it?s hard. lt?s just one of those things that any athlete who cares about his performance will always go through. Coming back from a poor performance, until you?ve rectified it with a solid performance it?s probably all in the back of your mind whether you say it or not. It?s a fact of life in any sport.?

[so he dwells on 2011?] ?I would imagine it?s almost impossible not to. Especially when you think about what his life is like. He?s in spring training now, hasn?t pitching yet. Every question [the media] is asking is probably about last year. So even if he wanted to forget about last year, I?m sure you guys would make it impossible to do so.?

[on if this could this be something that makes him stronger in the long run] ?His work ethic will never be anything but excellent again. It just won?t be. The standards have been set, there?s performances that he knows he?s met already he?s going to have to maintain those and improve on those off the field. And he?s going to take care of his business on the field with the pitching coaches and matt wieters and learn how to pitch better even when he doesn?t have his greatest stuff. But as far as ever slipping back into not being the most powerful athlete you can be. That wont happen anymore.?

[what makes you say that?] ?I wont let it happen for one. We?re friends now and he understands the importance of it. Whatever he does on the field, it wont be based on his power capacity. And that gives and athlete a tremendous peace of mind too. It?s bad enough getting hammered on the field. It?s especially bad when you maybe think you weren?t as prepared as you think you should have been. There?s nothing worse for an athlete, or anybody, as having that chronic remorse of ?Wow, I wish I would have done this a little bit better.? In that way he?s not different than the rest of us.

http://brittghiroli.mlblogs.com/2012/02/23/matusz-on-last-season-and-moving-forward/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said in the post above... Brady and his contacts will win the day.

He had Palmer out there talking to (assuming) ALL the guys, but especially the pitchers. Think about it...

Palmer, Like first half of January, flying 3000 miles to Irvine to talk to ... I can't even remember all the names. Matusz, Tillman, Hunter, ... Pierce, Sacko and Vanzetti.

Is even The Mighty Boras going to get Palmer to do that? Doubt it.

Palmer always wanted to help. He said he had never been asked. It's a shame if it is true.

Palmer has been standing beside Duquette while watching the bullpens in several photos yesterday and today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Palmer always wanted to help. He said he had never been asked. It's a shame if it is true.

Palmer has been standing beside Duquette while watching the bullpens in several photos yesterday and today.

VERY good news! Hadn't seen any photos but great to hear. DD said early on about getting guys back with Bmore connections. Brady and Jim are two good ones.

And I have to say... :angryfire:

All these different O's threads tonight, and was listening to some good old ZZ a while ago...

All I can hear in my head is the BRADY BUNCH THEME!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"His work ethic will never be anything but excellent again. It just won't be. The standards have been set, there's performances that he knows he's met already he's going to have to maintain those and improve on those off the field. And he's going to take care of his business on the field with the pitching coaches and Matt Wieters and learn how to pitch better even when he doesn't have his greatest stuff. But as far as ever slipping back into not being the most powerful athlete you can be. That won't happen anymore."

[what makes you say that?] "I won't let it happen for one. We're friends now and he understands the importance of it. Whatever he does on the field, it wont be based on his power capacity. And that gives and athlete a tremendous peace of mind too. It's bad enough getting hammered on the field. It's especially bad when you maybe think you weren't as prepared as you think you should have been. There's nothing worse for an athlete, or anybody, as having that chronic remorse of 'Wow, I wish I would have done this a little bit better.' In that way he's not different than the rest of us."

Good stuff here. I hope that kind of attitude will be held by all the players on the team under Brady's tutelage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'd also lost 5 mph off his FB. Will Brady's conditioning help with that? I've never been a pitcher but it seems like this would be helped more by training for explosiveness than the feel for his curve and change-up. I guess that I could really stretch things and speculate that his control and location might improve if his conditioning allows him to improve the repeatability of his delivery.

Don't forget that Mark Connor messed with his mechanics last year also. I'm sure that after years of using the same delivery and then having someone change it would mess up all your pitches in different ways.

Then, even after trying to revert back to your old mechanics, your dealing with confidence, trying to rebuild muscle memory and repeatibilty. Add to that poor conditioning and there's your velocity issues.

Hopefully, being stronger and confident will relax Matusz on the mound and he'll bounce back to the "ace" form of August-September of 2010. In a season that's filled with uncertainity and low expectations, Matusz coule emerge as a real pleasant surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • This is spot on. If Rubenstein means what he says, (Eilas/Sigbot will run the show) the question is what will Elias do with more resourses? How is Elias going to meld free agencey with a bigger budget and team needs going forward. I do not see Sigbot buying into long term high dollar deals for pitching. Particularly for 30 plus year old pitching. I feel any long term deals will be calculated around mutual advantage for team and player with as little risk as possible. I sure don't see Sigbot paying out eight years for three to four years potential benefit.   
    • Well first of all, how are you defining an impact starter?  I would guess you didn’t think Bradish would make an impact. I think out of Povich or McDermott that one of them can give us good enough starter innings. How much of an impact? Who knows. Ceiling is definitely higher with them than Kremer though.  Is Kremer an impact guy. Did you think he would be 2-3 years ago? Now, a guy like Luis DeLeon?  High impact potential there.  And we will see with guys like Baumeister, who we have seen so little of so far. You don’t have to spend 9 figures to invest in pitching. You can trade for it. That’s an investment.   You can make more sensible FA signings.    
    • If I’m writing the checks, I test out Gunnar, Holliday, Cowser, and Adley in that order.  IMO Gunnar is the obvious choice. Not because others aren’t deserving, but because Gunnar has the potential to get MUCH more expensive than he would be to extend today. Hes a realistic MVP candidate, plays great defense at a premium position, and will hit FA at 27.  The Witt contract at 11/288 ($26mm aav) as a starting point is actually a great DEAL relative to the average of the top 5 3B / SS contracts, which all orbit $30-$35mm AAV, and before any natural inflation over the next years of team control. Said differently, we would likely save $5-10mm per year by extending Gunnar now, which seems like a no brainer to me.   I don’t think the value of Burnes / Adley (finished products, too close to FA), or Holliday (generationally wealthy family) will change much between now and the decision point. Gunnar’s will only go up . Cowser wasn’t mentioned, and it’s probably not realistic for chemistry reasons until at least Santander has hit FA, but we may be looking at a 35 HR type of bat with solid defense. I’d like to lock that up.   
    • Agree with this.   The number one priority should be locking up Henderson, Holliday, and to a lesser extent, Adley.   Not that I don't want Adley around...I'm just not sure how many years you want to invest in a catcher.   Making a deal for a guy like Burnes this year could be an annual/semi-annual kind of thing.   Maybe you splurge one year and trade for a guy with two years left before FA where you may have to give up a bigger prospect.    I don't think it's smart to have long-term money in pitching.  
    • Based on the current state of the organization, I'm curious to see what this homegrown rotation looks like. What are the odds there's an impact SP in Seth Johnson, Chayce McDermott, and Cade Povich? Pretty low. What are the odds all 3 are busts? Pretty low. A likely median scenario is you have 1 serviceable SP, a reliever, and a bust. Or something along those lines.  I for one am much happier Burnes is in the rotation rather than Bassit, Eovaldi, or someone of that caliber. My preference would have been both once we learned about the Bradish + Means injuries. This time, we paid for the Burnes type front of the rotation pitcher in years of prospect control. I don't think that will always be a luxury we can afford.  Almost an entirely homegrown lineup and a GM who has shown the ability to piece together a productive bullpen. The rotation is where you strike. But it takes investments. No reason the Nationals can sign Scherzer and go win themselves a World Series and that avenue of success building is cut off to our collection of billionaire owners running a bottom 5 payroll currently. 
    • I would go for older but still elite/above average guys in areas of need who will sign short term deals even if they are high AAV, like some of those Verlander and Nelson Cruz contracts. Sonny Gray would have been good this year. Not sure who the equivalent guys will be next year but I don't see us being in the market for 10+/$300+ type deals. At least I hope we aren't.
    • I do not think the Orioles will spend >$200m on annual payroll anytime soon, but they have room to sign. Burnes Ace type every 3-6 years.    I would offer $150 over 5 years with incentives and options that could exceed $200m, to hedge a sunk cost for injuries.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...