Jump to content

Tommy Hunter Tonight


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 352
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Because he typically doesn't fall apart until he goes through an order 2 or 3 times.

The HR to Beltre was his first AB and it was smoked, but generally I've said the same thing when it comes to Hunter. His lack of movement with the FB is a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The HR to Beltre was his first AB and it was smoked, but generally I've said the same thing when it comes to Hunter. His lack of movement with the FB is a problem.

Hunter suffers from Joe Blanton syndrome. TooManyBallsOverThePlate-itus.

Hunter gets crushed when men are on. He'll give up his homeruns. Not at this rate. He's very, very bad this year.

That said, the home runs are hit (mostly) off his sinker. It's not sinking. Before tonight, there have only been *4* homeruns off of his 4 seamer. His sinker? 12. Even worse, is that people aren't swinging over his sinker. Only 4% whiffs over his sinker. That's his worst. His other numbers?

4 Seamer: 7%

Cutter: 9.7%

Slider: 12.5%

Curveball: 9.7%

Changeup: 8.9%

He hardly ever throws his slider. Only 16 times on the year. I'd argue that his sinker just isn't good this year.

Let's compare his sinker to last year.

Last year, his sinker had a 5.95% whiff rate. Only 0.74% of those sinkers were hit for homeruns. Only *2* were hit for home runs off his sinker.

I think the issue is that his sinker isn't effective this year, but he feels comfortable throwing it. He throws it the most second to his 4 seamer. I wonder what kind of pitcher he'd be if he eliminated his sinker right now, and strictly threw 4 seamers, change-ups, curveballs, sometimes a cutter (which is his 3rd fav. pitch) and his slider. FWIW, he didn't throw a slider last year. At all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because he typically doesn't fall apart until he goes through an order 2 or 3 times.

For one or two innings, if like the Rangers announcers said he can throw 97 or 98... that with the rest of his "stuff" could be a weapon in the 7th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Johnson should be starting' date=' not Hunter.[/quote']

Agreed. I know SJ has a spike in K per 9 this year but the Os should be riding his wave right now. Looks like he will start in Toronto to give Chen some rest but he should take the place of Hunter from now on and move Hunter into the BP to be the long man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough already. Texas had the right idea: Tommy Hunter is a relief pitcher. And a darn good one if used properly - please get him out of the rotation before he ends up costing us too much more.

Yup, middle relief, stop throwing the stupid cutter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...