Jump to content

Playoff Percentages


waroriole

Recommended Posts

We have to win our share of games against relatively weak teams (Boston, Toronto) and we should be in. If we do win our share, it is possible to pass Oakland who has six with Texas and 3 with NYY for the first WC or contest the NYY for the division.

The main thing that scares me is that Anaheim plays six against the weak Mariners team we just swept. It would not surprise me if Anaheim finishes 9-4 or 10-3 in which case we would be in trouble if we finish 5-8 or something like that. If LAA or Tampa finishes the year 8-5 or 7-6, we would be in unless we finish 3-10 or so.

I think 90% is a pretty sound number given where we are and the schedule we have left. Unfortunately, we have been a team that has defied the odds all year - so, hopefully, we not defy these particular odds.

I think the Mariners could win some games. They have Felix, and they have some good talent. They also shows a TON of fight, hanging with the Orioles. Very tight games. Could have gone either way. My point: Anaheim might not walk over them. Oakland having that many games against Texas is a very good thing. Texas is a scary damn team.

The Yankees face the A's, too. Hopefully they'll lose, but after that... gulp. They face the Twins and Jays. Taking them for the division is going to be really hard, considering that lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Right, so it plays out like this (for us to secure a playoff spot)

Magic number to eliminate the Tigers: 7 (O's wins + Tigers losses)

Magic number to eliminate the Rays: 8

Magic number to eliminate the Angels: 9

Basically, we go 9-4, we're in regardless.

Is this presuming the A's are the other WC team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Mariners could win some games. They have Felix, and they have some good talent. They also shows a TON of fight, hanging with the Orioles. Very tight games. Could have gone either way. My point: Anaheim might not walk over them. Oakland having that many games against Texas is a very good thing. Texas is a scary damn team.

The Yankees face the A's, too. Hopefully they'll lose, but after that... gulp. They face the Twins and Jays. Taking them for the division is going to be really hard, considering that lineup.

There's no easy wins. Hopefully, the Yankees overlook those two teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where was ESPN is June? or July? Or August? or two weeks ago? Far as I know they were predicting when the O's would fall apart.

At this point they are just stating the obvious. I would not exactly call it breaking news. They should probably just stick to articles on run differential. They are pretty good at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're five games up in the loss column with 13 to play. Think about that

Yes, I am sure that if you went through the history of baseball, 90% of the teams that had that big of a lead with only 13 games left made the playoffs. And, we have an easy schedule.

The problem is, 91.4% still isn't 100%. The odds of losing are just about the same as the odds of not rolling snake eyes with two dice (91.7%). Snake eyes happens just often enough to scare you,and seems a pretty apt analogy here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where was ESPN is June? or July? Or August? or two weeks ago? Far as I know they were predicting when the O's would fall apart.

At this point they are just stating the obvious. I would not exactly call it breaking news. They should probably just stick to articles on run differential. They are pretty good at that.

Well stated. I noticed that that run differential is just -10 now. Also, that seems like a pretty meaningless stat in many ways, unless you're talking about a particular game, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I am sure that if you went through the history of baseball, 90% of the teams that had that big of a lead with only 13 games left made the playoffs. And, we have an easy schedule.

The problem is, 91.4% still isn't 100%. The odds of losing are just about the same as the odds of not rolling snake eyes with two dice (91.7%). Snake eyes happens just often enough to scare you,and seems a pretty apt analogy here.

Dem's good odds. Maybe a more salient question would be, what is our chance of winning the division?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dem's good odds. Maybe a more salient question would be, what is our chance of winning the division?

Clearly, less than 50/50, since New York has a one-game lead on us and has the slightly easier schedule from here. But let's see where things stand after this weekend. The one tough Series the Yankees have is this one with Oakland. The odds could shift in our favor if we gain 2+ games this weekend. If we gain 1 game or less, I think the odds favor New York pretty heavily at that point.

BP says our odds of winning the division are only 22.6%, and the wild card 66.3%, for a total of 88.9% chance of making the playoffs.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/odds/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...