Jump to content

Matusz needs to go down and reinvent himself


Chevytrckman3

Recommended Posts

Ah yes, the last two starts. Walked 4 against NY, and hardly looked great IMO. Guess the two good starts sanwhiched between a 1-9 with an almost 11 ERA 2011, and tonight should give me reasons to think he's turned a cornered? Sorry, i'm just not convinced. Even in the previous two starts you mentioned, he didn't have great command. Atleast, not good enough, when you combine it with the stuff he has, to be successful on a consistant basis. He will show flashes yes, but i'm just not seeing it in him. It's not about beating up on Matusz.

Kind of amazing. People can knock Greg, but don't get on one of the board favorites. Like it or not, Matusz is to the starting rotation what Greg is to the bullpen. Inconsistant, and never know what your going to get from one game to the next.

In a (non) word: gah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Its the same problem, fastball command. That's really it. He's holding his own.

He's left a couple of off-speed pitches over the plate, but generally down. I agree, a lot of it is FB command. You can see it immediately when he flies open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's 5 outs away from registering a QS against the top offense in the AL, but no, clearly, we have better options waiting in AAA

I'll give credit where credit is due. He's hung in there. Hopefully I reversed-jinxed him. Not sure why so many took this thread as a personal bash against Matusz. Maybe it was the " I really hope he succeeds " part of the post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give credit where credit is due. He's hung in there. Hopefully I reversed-jinxed him. Not sure why so many took this thread as a personal bash against Matusz. Maybe it was the " I really hope he succeeds " part of the post?

If I ever tell you "No offense but" Prepare to be offended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give credit where credit is due. He's hung in there. Hopefully I reversed-jinxed him. Not sure why so many took this thread as a personal bash against Matusz. Maybe it was the " I really hope he succeeds " part of the post?

The frustration is definitely understandable, he really hasn't turned that corner....yet and he certainly hasn't reached the potential many of us thought he had when he was drafted. The thing is, what else can he do down in AAA? Last year is completely different than this year IMO. He was injured for much of last year and this year he's looked better.

He needs to be better, that much is certain, or at least more consistent, but he's either going to sink or swim up here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's left a couple of off-speed pitches over the plate, but generally down. I agree, a lot of it is FB command. You can see it immediately when he flies open.

That was basically the point I was attempting to make. He's just raring back and throwing. Unlike when he first came up, when he would use his fastball to set up the change. Now, it seems like he's trying to be a power pitcher, instead of mixing it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The frustration is definitely understandable, he really hasn't turned that corner....yet and he certainly hasn't reached the potential many of us thought he had when he was drafted. The thing is, what else can he do down in AAA? Last year is completely different than this year IMO. He was injured for much of last year and this year he's looked better.

He needs to be better, that much is certain, or at least more consistent, but he's either going to sink or swim up here.

I guess I look at the Halladay situation, and see what he did. But, Matusz doesn't have Halladay stuff. So, to compare the two situations isn't fair. So, I guess it is sink or swim here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I ever tell you "No offense but" Prepare to be offended.

I really don't take things personally on here. I made a comment, and touched some nerves on here. I just hope no one loses any sleep over anything I say, because I know I won't over any comments at me :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give credit where credit is due. He's hung in there. Hopefully I reversed-jinxed him. Not sure why so many took this thread as a personal bash against Matusz. Maybe it was the " I really hope he succeeds " part of the post?

He doesn't look like he was during the end of the 2010 season, but:

a) He's one of the top 5 pitchers in the organization not named Britton or Bundy

b) He's gotten good results against three of the best offenses in the game

I get what you're saying about the stuff, because the BBs are a concern, but the guy literally just had the worst season a pitcher has ever had, he's come back to be a pretty average pitcher in a very short period of time. He's earned the chance to have a few bad starts in a row without too much questioning, let alone three good starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • I would go Bradish game 1, no question. He's earned it Means game 2 because it's in Camden Yards. Teams will put righties up to face him and we have Waltimore to help protect against the long ball Grayson game 3 on the road Tough choice between Gibson or Kremer for game 4, but I bet Hyde gives the vet the nod. I think that means Bradish is available for game 5
    • I understand your point, but 40 HRs with a solid OBP won’t be a waste no matter where he plays.
    • Adley -  Had pretty much the same results as last year while playing 39 more games which are simply outstanding for a catcher. Handled the pitching staff as a leader, controlled the running game and hit well - 810 OPS. But his offense was very different this year.   In 2002 he hit righties - 889 OPS vs lefties - 552 OPS.  In 2023 he flipped that righties -778 OPS vs lefties  - 895 OPS.   He hits much better as a DH (874 OPS) vs C (786 OPS).  He is an on base machine 374 OBP.   He leads the team and the winning culture with his attitude and hugs. Grade A McCann - Agree Mountcastle - In an injury plagued year that cost him 132 at bats his biggest improvement was to his OBP at 328 compared to 309 in 2021 and 305 in 2022.   He seemed to adjust to the wall that has cost him power by hitting more up the middle.  While sharing 1B with O'Hearn instead of Mancini and DH with Adley he killed lefties with a 1052 OPS but fell off vs righties with a 640 OPS.  He seem like a platoon player at times.    He hit better as a DH (900 OPS) vs 1B (754). None of this is consistent on a year over year basis.  Some years he hits rights better, some years lefties, some years better as a 1B and some as a DH.    Grade  C+ while noting his improved OBP which is major IMO. O'Hearn - Agree Frazier - Agree Gunnar -  He has come so far so fast.  Deserves MVO.  Took over SS.  Much better SS than 3B at this point IMO.   Offensive weapon.  Grade A+ Urias -  Fell off in power from 16 HR to 4 HR and drop in  defense may have cost him his spot on the roster.  Grade D+ Mateo - Began the season as a potential starting SS but became a Backup SS.  As a utility player his speed on the base path and ability to steal (32 steals) is a weapon.    A game changer in close games which the O's play a lot.   Defense at SS dropped from elite to be roughly compared to Gunnar which is still a very high level.  Can't hit.  Grade as a utility player is a B-. Hays -  Has become a first half player over the last two years.  All-Star first half followed by a beat up body that costs him offensively in the 2nd half.  He plays hard.  Defensive standout in spite of losing speed as the year goes on due to injuries he plays through.  Wall has cost him some power but like Mountcastle the improved OBP to 325 is a impressive.  Agree with B- grade. Mullins - Agree.  Injuries cost him greatly.  Amazing he can play defense at such a high level even with the injuries. Grade C+ but an All Star when healthy. Santander - Agree Hicks - Wow.  Where did that come from.  Showed up at just the right time with Mullins injury and was a solid performer.   Unexpected.   Not the best backup centerfielder because his speed is average but can catch what he gets to.  Fine in the corners. Grade B- McKenna  - Agree Westburg -  Better that expected at 2B.  Rangy.  Solid.  Not as good at 3B.  SS only in emergencies.   Nice break in to the majors.  Future looks bright.  Grade B looks good.
    • If you play  Texas, they are excellent Vs righties or lefties. OPaCY is much tougher on lefties (and righties) than Globe Field is. So, you may go with GRod in game 2 because the lefties are going to struggle to hit more in OPACY anyway but at the end of the day, it may not make of a difference. They also may just want the rookie pitching at home. Kyle Gibson is intriguing. He has a high OPS against the Rangers but he pitched for them in 2021 And he has a sub 3 ErA at home that year. In its first full year, Globe had a 97 park effect. This year it’s 106.  So that’s a factor too.  
    • Thanks for a great detailed report @Frobby. I'm not sure I understand how the stats for Rutschman and McCann warrant identical B- grades. Sure... Adley missed high expectations and McCann was better than last year's backups, but for me their "test scores" would not each receive the same grade. 
    • Personally I’d rather see Means start a game at Camden than on the road.
    • Texas has more guys hitting from the left side overall, a 50/50 split this year hitting as righties or lefties. Tampa Bay had only 38% of their ABs as lefties. But I think we can beat either team. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...