Jump to content

Juror in Roger Clemens Trial Falls Asleep in Court


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Joe Angel and Mike Boddicker both testify for Clemens.

A baseball announcer testified Tuesday that he saw Roger Clemens at a golf course on the day in 1998 that prosecutors say Clemens attended a pool party at Jose Canseco's South Florida house.

Joe Angel, who was a broadcaster with the then-Florida Marlins at the time, said he saw Clemens around the pro shop at the Weston Hills Country Club between about 8:30 a.m. ET and 9 a.m. ET on June 9, 1998.

Also Tuesday, former pitcher Mike Boddicker, a teammate of Clemens with the Boston Red Sox from 1988 to 1990, recalled seeing Clemens get a vitamin B12 shot. Prosecutors say that Clemens' claim that he had received B12 injections was a cover story for steroids.

"I saw the vial," Boddicker said. "It said B12."

The government might have made a minor tactical mistake in cross-examining Boddicker, when prosecutor Steve Durham asked if there were secrets in the clubhouse. That opened the door to defense attorney Rusty Hardin to ask Boddicker if Clemens did anything privately that he didn't want the public to know about.

Yes, Boddicker said. Clemens would leave in uniform to see kids in the hospital.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8012786/announcer-joe-angel-says-roger-clemens-seen-golf-course-day-jose-canseco-party

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the update. :)

Joe Angel must have as good a photographic memory as I do, since he remembers the exact date and the exact time that he saw Clemens 14 years ago. In fact, it might be even better than mine (shudder). Unless something very, very memorable happened on that day in his life, how or why would Angel remember seeing Clemens specifically at that time and on that date ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the update. :)

Joe Angel must have as good a photographic memory as I do, since he remembers the exact date and the exact time that he saw Clemens 14 years ago. In fact, it might be even better than mine (shudder). Unless something very, very memorable happened on that day in his life, how or why would Angel remember seeing Clemens specifically at that time and on that date ???

Obviously Angel was meeting Clemens there to pick up his own B-12 vials! :rolleyes:

This whole ordeal is a waste of time and tax payers money. I'm not a fan of the Rocket, but I also could care less if he took steroids or not, or if he lied about it or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... Joe Angel must have as good a photographic memory as I do, since he remembers the exact date and the exact time that he saw Clemens 14 years ago. In fact, it might be even better than mine (shudder). Unless something very, very memorable happened on that day in his life, how or why would Angel remember seeing Clemens specifically at that time and on that date ???

The probability is that golf course records provided both Clemens and Angel the date. All Angel had to recall was that he saw Clemens while he was at the course. That's still pretty remarkable, given that Angel was around baseball celebrities every day on his job, and that some of these guys hit the links every time they have the opportunity.

"I saw the vial," Boddicker said. "It said B12."

So did the one that Tejada injected into Palmeiro's rear. It's irrelevant. The defense is attempting to snow jurors with meaningless anecdotal evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The probability is that golf course records provided both Clemens and Angel the date. All Angel had to recall was that he saw Clemens while he was at the course. That's still pretty remarkable, given that Angel was around baseball celebrities every day on his job, and that some of these guys hit the links every time they have the opportunity.

"I saw the vial," Boddicker said. "It said B12."

So did the one that Tejada injected into Palmeiro's rear. It's irrelevant. The defense is attempting to snow jurors with meaningless anecdotal evidence.

Exactly. With all of our modern technology, you have to believe that it's possible to find a way to paste a "B-12" label onto something that doesn't have any B-12 in it.

High-tech **** ....... like when an airline stewardess teaches everyone how to use a seat-belt during the safety lecture.

George Carlin, 1992.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay let's just clear Clemens of all charges. Mike Boddicker has set the record straight about the vial having B12 in it, because it said B12 on it. ;) What a ludicrous argument.

Come to think of it, last night at poker, the guys were eating Veggie Chips...OUT OF A TUB THAT SAID ANIMAL CRACKERS ON IT!!! WTF is going on?! I could have sworn I knew what an animal cracker looked like but now I'm super confused due to this new found logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...