Jump to content

Heyman: Oswalt on O's radar


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

I'm not familiar with Headley, although I looked up his offensive stats and wasn't impressed. What exactly makes him such an item for us, aside from our need for a good third baseman, i.e. is he that good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I really don't understand your argument, Roy. We would have to give up prospects for a 3B. We would be able to sign Oswalt for just money. Also, a team can absolutely stay in a pennant race with a weak infielder, but if we don't have a consistent starters than we are wasting our time.

One doesn't necessarily negate the other, but to say that a 3B upgrade is more important than signing Oswalt, well that's just silly.

Also, Oswalt is signing a one year deal no matter what, he has made that clear. No need to argue over this.

It's not silly given Oswalt's age and recent injuries. I'm not sure how well he would be able to pitch for us, to be honest. I definitely think the corner infield positions are just as big a weakness on this team as starting pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your point being what? That Heyman (and everybody else for that matter) was wrong at one point because Detroit came out of nowhere and significantly outbid every other team when it wasn't an obvious need for them?

Keeping in mind that Prince signed 4 months after that article was published. The O's were considered a front-runner because we had a need and the assumption is that we'd open the checkbook for him. Everybody that needed a 1b was considered a front-runner at point. Hell the BoSox were considered a front-runner for Oswalt before the season even began.

Clearly you have not been following this team and the way Angelos spends his money the past 10 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not silly given Oswalt's age and recent injuries. I'm not sure how well he would be able to pitch for us, to be honest. I definitely think the corner infield positions are just as big a weakness on this team as starting pitching.

This my biggest objection isn't that Oswalt won't come here, it's that in the National League he threw 139 innings and K'd 93 guys. That's not a great sign for a guy coming into the thick of an AL East Pennant race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not familiar with Headley, although I looked up his offensive stats and wasn't impressed. What exactly makes him such an item for us, aside from our need for a good third baseman, i.e. is he that good?

Headley can hit a decent average, walk a ton, and carry a very solid glove. He's most likely not an All-Star for us, but he's a quality player in a spot where we're desperate for nothing more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who would feel somewhat dirty signing Oswalt for 1/2 the season? I remember a few years back when the Yankees signed Clemens for 1/2 a season to bulk up their pitching staff I remember thinking that was a dirty move and typical Yankee type thing.

That said if it were to happen as unlikely as it seems, I would probably be a happy boy as soon as I got over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Headley can hit a decent average, walk a ton, and carry a very solid glove. He's most likely not an All-Star for us, but he's a quality player in a spot where we're desperate for nothing more than that.

This. Our performance across the board at 3B is awful, and Headley is a great defender and can hold his own offensively. He's SLIGHTLY above average at 3B, which when you've gotten performance as bad as we have there, is fantastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All he said is that the Oswalt is on the Orioles radar. You're basically discounting the vaguest statement ever ("Hmm. We could possibly, potentially, look at signing Oswalt!") because a guy was wrong once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time believing his friend and mentor, Nolan Ryan allows him to play anywhere but in his home state. With Feliz down and Feldman not impressive, the Rangers are very interested in Oswalt right now. I just dont see him passing up that opportunity to play in Baltimore.

http://espn.go.com/dallas/mlb/story/_/id/7963924/texas-rangers-manager-ron-washington-roy-oswalt-decision-belongs-front-office

As far as 3B, I'd talk to Colorado. With Nolan Arenado on his way and the Rockies likely not a contender, it might make Jordan Pacheco expendable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Well ...... if Oswalt does decide to come back this season, I would think that he would want to be with a solid team like the Orioles or the Rangers, not mediocre clubs the the Yankees and the Red Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly you have not been following this team and the way Angelos spends his money the past 10 years.

Who said it was my assumption? And how does that change my original point that he was discounting a vague statement because a guy made a prediction that turned out wrong 4 months later because of something NOBODY saw coming. Secondly; pretty much all the reporters thought we were involved significantly in some fashion on the bidding for Prince up until basically the 2 or 3 days before he signed with Detroit; so obviously somebody had some indicators somewhere that we were willing to spend in some rather significant (for us) fashion. Lets not pretend it was just one reporter thinking we were involved, it was multiple reporters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...