Jump to content

Bedard and the Reds(again)


weemnj

Recommended Posts

Would you do the Bedard and Penn/Olson for Bailey, Cueto, Votto, and Encarnacion?

I truly think this deal would be incredible for us...and yes...I know I'm repeating! :D

I would do BOTH Penn and Olson if they add back Hamilton as well as Encarnacion------and the Reds would become odds-on to win their division---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I would do BOTH Penn and Olson if they add back Hamilton as well as Encarnacion------and the Reds would become odds-on to win their division---

Yup...I'd do it as well. I think if the Dodgers aren't willing to give up Kershaw, the Reds may be our best match. I think I like the Seattle and Cincy trade ideas a little more than the Dodgers ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I am finding Cueto to be the main pitcher goal-----look at the walk ratio with the K's-----looks like he already found it .

Talk on all the Reds boards that he is certainly the better prospect between him and Bailey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have the making of a quality offer from the Reds above.

I would not be disappointed with the haul in the rumor, but I think the Dodgers and Ms could both top it.

My order of preference is along the lines of:

Dodgers - Kemp, LaRoche, Elbert, Hu

Mariners - Jones, Morrow, Balentien, Triunfel

I'm split on those two deals and could be convinced either way.

I like the Reds deal third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have the making of a quality offer from the Reds above.

I would not be disappointed with the haul in the rumor, but I think the Dodgers and Ms could both top it.

My order of preference is along the lines of:

Dodgers - Kemp, LaRoche, Elbert, Hu

Mariners - Jones, Morrow, Balentien, Triunfel

I'm split on those two deals and could be convinced either way.

I like the Reds deal third.

I don't think there's any way you get all three position players from the Mariners.

I do like the Dodgers deal, but I'm not thrilled about Elbert. I think we need a starter back in the deal. Bailey, Cueto, or Morrow could all be in our rotation next season.

We really need to play the Bedard chip to its furthest extent. To me, he and Roberts are the two guys we can deal and get back quality, major league ready prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have the making of a quality offer from the Reds above.

I would not be disappointed with the haul in the rumor, but I think the Dodgers and Ms could both top it.

My order of preference is along the lines of:

Dodgers - Kemp, LaRoche, Elbert, Hu

Mariners - Jones, Morrow, Balentien, Triunfel

I'm split on those two deals and could be convinced either way.

I like the Reds deal third.

If you can get Votto, Bailey and Cueto... you still prefer the other two? No way.

We pick up those three and Wieters probably becomes our fourth best prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not getting all three from the Reds so there is no reason to compare that package from the Reds to the other options. I prefer the Seattle package that BB said we want because I've read some good stuff about Morrow. Dude has one of the best fastballs in the game. I think he could be a tremendous starter in the league by the end of next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impressive, but not necessarily a good thing.

Those innings were spread out from the start of the season and up through winter ball. They just shut him down about a week or two ago so he can rest up and be prepared for spring training. He got a non roster invite earlier this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I'm a little late with this post, but I would do bailey, Cuerto and Votto in a heartbeat for Bedard, they are some major prospects and I trhink they they could def improve our rotation. with Loewen, Bailey, Guthrie, Cuerto and cabreara or any number of our good pitching prospects, we could have the best rotation in the AL east, yes I did just say that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not according to B-R - unless you're adding Winter League or something (which shouldn't count).

Besides, I'm not so sure it would be a good thing for a 21-year old to be throwing 200 innings in a season - even it would certainly prepare him to pitch for Dusty.

He is going need 250 ip in a minor league season to prepare for Dusty in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not according to B-R - unless you're adding Winter League or something (which shouldn't count).

Besides, I'm not so sure it would be a good thing for a 21-year old to be throwing 200 innings in a season - even it would certainly prepare him to pitch for Dusty.

I did add the winter league to that total. I think he threw somewhere around 160 innings during the regular season.

Keep dreaming about these Reds trade ideas because they are science fiction right now. I wouldn't mind seeing Erik in a Reds uniform next year but the O's won't get all of the Reds top prospects for him. Wayne may be the butt of a lot of jokes here but he's not that stupid to trade away the team's future for potentially only two years of a pitcher even if he is an awesome one like Erik.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did add the winter league to that total. I think he threw somewhere around 160 innings during the regular season.

Keep dreaming about these Reds trade ideas because they are science fiction right now. I wouldn't mind seeing Erik in a Reds uniform next year but the O's won't get all of the Reds top prospects for him. Wayne may be the butt of a lot of jokes here but he's not that stupid to trade away the team's future for potentially only two years of a pitcher even if he is an awesome one like Erik.

He was stupid enough to hire Baker. I don't think I can be shock about the amount of prospects he could give up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...