Jump to content

Attendance to Date: 12.5% Over 2011


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

Should go over the 1,000,000 mark today, 38 home dates in (there will only be 80 this year due to an unscheduled doubleheader earlier this season to make up a rainout). Looking down the road, the O's have a Thursday-Sunday series with the Yankees on Sept. 6-9 and a Friday-Sunday series with the Red Sox on Sept. 28-30. They have a weekday series with the Red Sox on August 14-16. No other huge draws like the Nats and Phillies, but I'm reasonably optimistic they can reach 2.1 mm in attendance this year, and maybe 2.2-2.3 mm depending on how long they stay in the race.

Which begs the question: Is there really any doubt they would draw 3+ million a year if they just put a consistently competitive product on the field?

I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well, I don't know about 3 Million, they still only drew 18K last night. I know that's during the week but I was hoping for at low 20s. They still require 37K a game for 3 million but at least we can somewhat debunk the theory that the DC fans were the reason for good attendance in the 90s. There were plenty of Nats fans last weekend but it was dominant like a Sox or Yanks game.

I think a consistent, good product would yield about 2.5m a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I don't know about 3 Million, they still only drew 18K last night. I know that's during the week but I was hoping for at low 20s. They still require 37K a game for 3 million but at least we can somewhat debunk the theory that the DC fans were the reason for good attendance in the 90s. There were plenty of Nats fans last weekend but it was dominant like a Sox or Yanks game.

I think a consistent, good product would yield about 2.5m a year.

I look at it this way -- we drew 2.6 mm in 2005, the year the Nats arrived. That was after the team had 7 losing seasons in a row. That tells me that, even with the Nats around, a consistently winning team in Baltimore would draw 3 million. The drop from 2.6 mm in 2005 to the more recent season is more a function of constant losing than it is the Nats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18,000 on Wednesday was not a good crowd. Nice weather and the O's still had the second lowest attendance of any team. Winning has helped this year but if they go on a skid they will be back to the usual low crowds. Winning brings the crowds out and they need to keep the fans hopes up. Attendance for the Phils and Nats on the weekend would have been close to sellouts even if the team was losing. This weekend series crowds against Cleveland should be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18,000 on Wednesday was not a good crowd. Nice weather and the O's still had the second lowest attendance of any team. Winning has helped this year but if they go on a skid they will be back to the usual low crowds. Winning brings the crowds out and they need to keep the fans hopes up. Attendance for the Phils and Nats on the weekend would have been close to sellouts even if the team was losing. This weekend series crowds against Cleveland should be interesting.

Last summer, we played a Thursday-Sunday 4-game series with the Indians that drew 92,741. So, there's your marker. The Thursday game drew 22,780. That series was in mid-July. This one should draw better, I think, but it's a matter of how much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I don't know about 3 Million, they still only drew 18K last night. I know that's during the week but I was hoping for at low 20s. They still require 37K a game for 3 million but at least we can somewhat debunk the theory that the DC fans were the reason for good attendance in the 90s. There were plenty of Nats fans last weekend but it was dominant like a Sox or Yanks game.

I think a consistent, good product would yield about 2.5m a year.

DC fans weren't the sole reason, but they were certainly an input. Not only were they a component of the high attendance, they were likely a very well-heeled component with much higher than average revenue attached. Read about Jack Abramoff for about 10 minutes and it's clear that the Orioles used to be a regular destination for lobbyists from K street and their buddies. Now almost all of them go to Nats Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last summer, we played a Thursday-Sunday 4-game series with the Indians that drew 92,741. So, there's your marker. The Thursday game drew 22,780. That series was in mid-July. This one should draw better, I think, but it's a matter of how much better.

Tonight is buddy night and a T-Shirt giveaway. The buddy night might get another 5.000 in the park. We shall see how close we come to the 22,700.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tonight is buddy night and a T-Shirt giveaway. The buddy night might get another 5.000 in the park. We shall see how close we come to the 22,700.

Not close. 17,676. But it may be that people who want to go to a game in this series are choosing the Earl Weaver game on Saturday. Let's see what the four game total is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not close. 17,676. But it may be that people who want to go to a game in this series are choosing the Earl Weaver game on Saturday. Let's see what the four game total is.

I think the terrible heat is going to hurt attendance some this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • I was talking about the lease negotiations dragging on for years. The interest rates and the cost to the taxpayers would have been alot cheaper if he extended back then. They are not going anywhere. Might have probably been a different story if the legislation would not have passed a bill for 1.2  billion  in stadium improvements.  But probably would have given the team something. 
    • I don’t think that’s a significant sample to impact decision making. He has also generally DH’d against LHP and, outside of last season, has been stronger against LHP in his professional and college career.  It’s more likely driven by that then by any potential benefits from DHing.  In fact, IIRC research suggests that there’s a “penalty” to DHing and over sufficient samples players generally hit better when they play in the field.  The choice is basically McCann vs. Mullins against LHP. McCann may be a better hitter against LHP, but the difference in defense by playing Hicks in CF instead of Mullins is dramatic. Starting McCann also creates a headache when you inevitably want to pinch hit for him later. You need to then put in Adley and lose the DH, and hope that Adley doesn’t suffer any injury that would require he leave the game.  Altogether I’d be surprised to see McCann starting in a playoff game, but it’s not out of the question.
    • I think it’s been overlooked how good and deep the Orioles’ left handed relievers are. Most teams with good bullpens generally will have one lefty out there on the level of Coulombe, Perez and Hall, and at most two. Even the great Orioles bullpens of past years didn’t have 3 quality lefty relievers like this. That’s a huge strength.  Pair that with the strength of the Orioles’ righty starters and the Orioles are really well situated for any matchup.
    • Mountcastle being back to pick up for O'Hearn if he can't shake his first slump of an amazing season is a big plus. But I'm worried that the days off can just as well have the opposite effect--I still remember the juggernaut Rockies team of 2007 getting swept after they waited around for the AL championship to be decided. Or last season's 111-51 Dodgers team losing to the over-performing Padres (final regular season Dodgers game: Oct. 5th, first playoff game: Oct. 11th). I wonder what regimen LA will follow this season.
    • The Oriole braintrust and coaches have done such a wonderful job, I hope they have some secret to keeping the team ready for the postseason battles despite the bye week off. Dodgers and Braves must have also figured out a plan.
    • If any combination of Irvin, Flaherty, Fuji, Baumann with the locks of Gibson, Webb, Wells, Hall, Coulombe, Cano, Perez are all in the bullpen im not sure we need 13 pitchers.    Is 3 long men really needed(Gibson/Irvin/Flaherty) with days off? Hall/Wells can go more than 1. No doubt Kremer would be the one who could turn it up out of the BP opposed to Gibson BUT if Kremer can give you a start of 5 good innings as a 4th starter thats hard to pass on. -- Hyde wants to play matchups like crazy of late so i do think they'll take 13. O's love close games, old extra inning rules could be a factor in need for more length. 
    • Mullins too.  Seems like only Adley has been fairly hot lately.  Hopefully Mountcastle's double tonight will get things going for everyone else.  Fingers crossed the several days off they'll get next week will help reenergize things.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...