Jump to content

Give Pearce a chance


Bohs&O's

Recommended Posts

Now I am one of the few who would like to get Alfonso Soriano but that probably wont happen. With the return of B-rob as our leadoff man, I don't see why we need Chavez in left. We should give Pearce atleast a week or two straight of playing leftys and rightys and see if we stole a real diamond in the rough from the stanks. It's not like we will lose any production even if he does stink. He really looks like a good ball player to me. Just a thought...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I agree about giving Pearce a chance. The only thing Chavez seems to bring to the game is speed....which is of little value since he doesn't get on base....and his defense isn't all that great from what I've seen. Pearce looks and plays like he's hungry. So....feed him, Buck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we could easily get a 750 OPS with good OBP from Pearce or more. And with some decent defense, I'm fine with that as a stopgap. Chavez has been just brutal. He's cost us 1.1 WAR in only 108 plate appearances. And ZIPS projects him at replacement level from here on out, which seems about right to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....... All we are saaaaaaaayiiiiiing .........

Damn, beat me to it.

Nah. It's more like, OFFNY practically lives on the OH, and The Wedge actually has better things to do with his life most of the time. :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 WAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 WAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
    • Trumbo was a DH impersonating a fielder, Santander is just a very poor fielder. It's not a perfect comp (is there really even such a thing?) but he is an absolutely relevant comp for this team in this situation. He is the poster child for why taking the draft pick and moving on is the right choice. And Santander is still a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier.
    • To this end I feel like we always had a pretty short leash with him. From the first three starts as an oriole to the yo-yo-ing this year. I would have preferred we just left him in the #5 starter role and see what happened. And maybe he’ll get that opportunity elsewhere like you said, whereas here it always seemed like his role was changing. 
    • Santander to Trumbo isn't as good a comparison as you think. Their raw stats are fairly similar but Trumbo played in a much more offensive era.  Santander is a much better athlete, defender and consistent player than Trumbo was.
    • I'd rather he not brazenly cheat like Cruz did lol. Also, Cruz hit for average and got on base (.277 career AVG, .343 career OBP), which are definitely not tools in Santander's toolbox (.246 career AVG, .307 career OBP).
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...