Jump to content

Are Orioles Going to Make A Blockbuster Deal With Cubs? BR Story


section18

Recommended Posts

Any three of Matusz, Arrieta, Tillman and Britton for Dempster and Garza. Don't want Soriano.

Schoop, Matusz, Avery and Britton would net Garza IMO and taking on Soriano's salary might net Dempster.

Let me ask everyone this, if the Orioles were to add Soriano, Dempster and Garza, do we make the playoffs? If we don't, do we make the playoffs?

Garza

Hammel

Chen

Dempster

Arrieta

Is that staff good enough to compete?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I would think that the Cubs could get better than Schoop and Arrieta if they were to deal Garza. I do not think that this story makes sense because the deal for the Cubs does not make any sense. I think that moving Dempster and Soriano saves the Cubs money and that makes sense, but dealing Garza would net a good return IMO.

I do too...much better. Garza is going to be a big chip for them and Epstein is going to make the most of it. IMO, Garza is going to bring at least a top 50 prospect and a couple of other good pieces. Maybe a B prospect to go with the centerpiece and then someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do too...much better. Garza is going to be a big chip for them and Epstein is going to make the most of it. IMO, Garza is going to bring at least a top 50 prospect and a couple of other good pieces. Maybe a B prospect to go with the centerpiece and then someone else.

I'm not weighing in to one side or the other in re: the hypothetical trade, but Arrieta and Matusz in the NL Central? The Cubs would be getting plenty of value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not weighing in to one side or the other in re: the hypothetical trade, but Arrieta and Matusz in the NL Central? The Cubs would be getting plenty of value.

I was referring and agreeing with an earlier post in that I don't think Arrieta and Schoop would get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not weighing in to one side or the other in re: the hypothetical trade, but Arrieta and Matusz in the NL Central? The Cubs would be getting plenty of value.

I would rather have a top prospect or two. Some team will overpay for Garza and I hope that team is not the Orioles. We run an Orioles site here, but let's say that we ran a Cub site. Would you trade Garza for Arrieta and Matusz? The Cubs probably have this thread up on the boards and are laughing the same way that we would do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather have a top prospect or two. Some team will overpay for Garza and I hope that team is not the Orioles. We run an Orioles site here, but let's say that we ran a Cub site. Would you trade Garza for Arrieta and Matusz? The Cubs probably have this thread up on the boards and are laughing the same way that we would do.

Oh, for sure. If I'm a Cubs fan, I want multiple, sure (or near sure) things for the team's best trade chip (apart from Castro). That being said...Garza has an ERA+ of 98 this year (and his ERA is almost identical to his FIP). I'd like to think that the Cubs' fans would realize that getting Arrieta AND Matusz in a Garza deal, given the differences in leagues/divisions (among other things) certainly wouldn't be a situation in which the Cubs were getting fleeced.

So...the suggested deal probably isn't anywhere close to the tops of Chicago fans' lists, but it's not a laugher, either (IMO).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A potential negotiation in a trade with the Cubs could be to allow the Orioles to demote Flaherty.

Screw that. Let's take one of the potential trade candidates out and throw Flaherty in with the deal.

They can have him back and we can keep one of our better prospects. Win win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schoop, Matusz, Avery and Britton would net Garza IMO and taking on Soriano's salary might net Dempster.

Just kick me in the balls if that happens.

That is WAY too much to give up for Garza.

I'd do one of Matusz/Britton and Avery for him. But nothing more. And if that isn't enough, and I doubt it is, then oh, well.

Let me ask everyone this, if the Orioles were to add Soriano, Dempster and Garza, do we make the playoffs?

That would clearly improve the odds.

If we don't, do we make the playoffs?

We still have a shot.

Garza

Hammel

Chen

Dempster

Arrieta

Is that staff good enough to compete?

Obviously, yes. We're competing now w an inferior staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, for sure. If I'm a Cubs fan, I want multiple, sure (or near sure) things for the team's best trade chip (apart from Castro). That being said...Garza has an ERA+ of 98 this year (and his ERA is almost identical to his FIP). I'd like to think that the Cubs' fans would realize that getting Arrieta AND Matusz in a Garza deal, given the differences in leagues/divisions (among other things) certainly wouldn't be a situation in which the Cubs were getting fleeced.

So...the suggested deal probably isn't anywhere close to the tops of Chicago fans' lists, but it's not a laugher, either (IMO).

That's what I don't think people realize. He's not pitching very good this year, and so many people on here want to give an arm and a leg for him. Well, he would be our #3 SP right now, and cost a lot (money and players). There is negative value involved in trading for Garza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Not a chance. Someone will take a look at him in their pen if the Orioles try to move him now. Somebody will ultimately need to be sent down, go on the Jimenez pothole IL, or get DFA'd.   
    • I’m skeptical how much the lack of scouting report matters nowadays. They have all the same data on pitchers in AAA as they do in the MLB, you can figure out a lot about a pitcher without ever having someone there watching them. Not to discount that additional value, just to say it’s not like the old days when a guy could come up and be pretty much unknown.  Plus Suárez just pitched a lot in Spring Training and was pretty much exactly what we saw yesterday. 
    • I definitely agree that we keep him in the rotation for as long as he is effective. It’s just with Bradish and Means coming back there’s that inevitable roster crunch incoming with all the out of options RP.  If he can maintain 96 as a SP and stay healthy then he should be a SP. He has 4 pitches even if relies heavily on the four seamer and cutter, but you could see him working in other pitchers more as he turned the lineup over. However, I’m skeptical he can actually maintain that velo with a SP workload over the course of a season and not get hurt. Big spikes in velo are often correlated with injuries, and you could see him running out of gas towards the end of his start yesterday and he threw less than 80 pitches. A bunch of 93s on the radar gun in that last inning.
    • I think it’s possible he would agree to be optioned, but he has 5 years and 7 days so being optioned for more than 3 weeks would cause him to not hit free agency this offseason. Once he’s optioned he can’t contractually force the Orioles to call him up quicker than those 3 weeks. They could make some sort of handshake agreement on it but it would be putting faith in the Orioles to stick to that. If he’s confident he’s healthy and as ready as he’s going to be, even if the Orioles are not, he’s better off rejecting an option. 
    • Obviously they weren’t going to hit at that level, but this slump is surprising.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...