Jump to content

Left Field: Get Alfonso Soriano!


Flacco Machado

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What is pretty incredible (aside from the fact that more than a few people actually think this is a good idea) is that you actually think that is pretty incredible and that you need it to be explained to you that 0 errors in 73 games means very little. Soriano has a negative dWAR this year, as he has throughout his career, especially bad the last 3 years (-2.0, -2.1, -1.6 on BBref).

Apparently you need it explained to you that he's still a much better option than anyone the Orioles currently have out there, especially when you consider his bat and what kind of impact he could have at OPACY. Or maybe we shouldn'e even bother.

It is also astounding that people who seem to have no problem whatsoever with Chris Davis playing in the outfield continually bash Soriano and claim that we should have no interest in him because he isn't very good defensively.

Uh, ok?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow....that is pretty incredible. Not to mention he's hitting better than he has in a long long time. I think it's pretty clear that this trade needs to happen if we stand any chance whatsoever of competing for anything other than dead last in the AL East yet again.

Come on Duquette' date=' show us you've got it in you![/quote']

The problem is that first place and dead last in the AL East is separated by just 9 games in the loss column and that is with every team in the AL East being .500 or over at the moment. I think that the Orioles need help in RF (Markakis), LF (Avery), 1B (?), and 3B (?) on offense (maybe defense too) along with SP#3, SP#4 and SP#5. I could see the Orioles making a Soriano/Dempster move and I could see one of Tillman/Britton locking down the #5 spot, but that still leaves this team hurting for a legit #3/#4 starter, 1B and 3B IMO and that is assuming that Markakis will be back and healthy in the near future and Brian Roberts is not going to the DL.

My point is that teams can add a couple players at the deadline, but the ability to add 5-7 players is almost impossible. The Orioles best chance might be to call up Bundy, Schoop and Machado and go all-in, but that isn't going to happen. I expect things to continue along this path moving forward and am still very happy with the 2012 product compared to what I thought that they would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently you need it explained to you that he's still a much better option than anyone the Orioles currently have out there' date=' especially when you consider his bat and what kind of impact he could have at OPACY. [b']Or maybe we shouldn'e even bother[/b].

You probably shouldn't (nor should I), if you're going to make an argument as vapid as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll again say that he is not the best option defensively. I know that. But, his defense has improved this year. I look at it this way. Avery is probably better defensively and offers speed, but the big thing is, IF DD is going for it, then Soriano offers us the best chance to win, as long as we get either Dempster or Garza back. If we don't get either of them, then no deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You probably shouldn't (nor should I), if you're going to make an argument as vapid as that.

Yes, clearly you are correct that Soriano would hold little value to this team and therefore if the Cubs tried to throw him in with any deal for Garza we should definitely turn it down. Wonderful analysis, spot on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll again say that he is not the best option defensively. I know that. But, his defense has improved this year. I look at it this way. Avery is probably better defensively and offers speed, but the big thing is, IF DD is going for it, then Soriano offers us the best chance to win, as long as we get either Dempster or Garza back. If we don't get either of them, then no deal.

Isnt Dempster on the DL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on how much of his contract we would need to eat and if we could get someone like Dempster back in the deal for very little in terms of prospects.

I have heard the chicago is willing to eat all but $2-3MM of his contract. They want to move him but are probably going to wait until the deadline is near.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant't look at this in a vacuum for our team situation right now. Soriano is owed 18M the next two years plus some 10M this year I'm estimating. If we were in the proverbial "all-in" mode, then sure I guess we should look to pick him up cause the LF options are barren (I like Avery, but different debate/argument here).

At the beginning of the season I personally thought the O's chances of making the postseason was 0%, they proved me wrong. Now I think its more of a 15%, still not tremendous chances in my book. This is all my personal thinking, but this team just sucks to much to make a marginal (overpaid) acquisition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want Soriano or Avery out there.

Pearce, unfortunately, isn't cutting it. Flaherty is suited for the infield moreso than the outfield but I'm not sure his offensive production warrants a starting role anywhere.

Soriano, as some have said already, is having one of his best seasons in a long time. If we're making a push for the postseason, and I sincerely hope that we are, I believe we should go for Alfonso. (Along with Garza) If we're going a different route than Garza, I think we should just stick with Avery. He's hit rather well and seems to be a spark more often than not.

If this was a perfect world though, Reimold would be batting leadoff right now for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soriano is such an unbelievably bad idea, I can't grasp how so many people are behind it. The guy is bad defender and despite a decent start this season so far, he has also been a pretty awful hitter the last few seasons. He's also owed a ton of money. We aren't going to win this year, this team isn't good. I hope DD knows that like most of us do and doesn't waste anything on Alfonso Soriano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soriano is such an unbelievably bad idea, I can't grasp how so many people are behind it. The guy is bad defender and despite a decent start this season so far, he has also been a pretty awful hitter the last few seasons. He's also owed a ton of money. We aren't going to win this year, this team isn't good. I hope DD knows that like most of us do and doesn't waste anything on Alfonso Soriano.

I can't see us making a trade for him.. I think pitching will be our next move if any other moves are made. I'd love to just keep avery in LF, he's solid on D and he's not a much worse hitter than anyone else we have playing LF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • In 4 out of the next 9 we will face a LH starting pitcher. So there should be plenty of playing time to go around for him especially if he is going to start against lefties. Because those will be games that O'Hearn doesn't play and you gotta imagine that Mullins will sit a day or 2 against at least some of the Yanks tough lefties (Rodon and Cortez).
    • Maybe, but not if they DH Adley vs LHP, which they’ve continued to do a lot this year. If so, he’s not going to take the LH ABs from Cowser or Mullins because that means putting Kjerstad in the field somewhere and massively downgrading the defense. Otherwise Kjerstad is just replacing Mountcastle or Santander vs LHP, so not really a different consideration for playing time than when facing RHP. So hopefully Kjerstad can pick up some ABs vs LHP from O’Hearn at DH when Adley stays at C or gets a full day off, but I don’t expect that too often.
    • We know that there will have to be tough roster decisions with this team in the near future. Is the plan to put those off until the offseason no matter what? If that's the plan, you might see a rationale for keeping the status quo. At the same time, I'd be fine with making one or two of those decisions by the deadline. But let's be honest here, you're talking about the risk with one player (Norby) by making the change I'm saying to make. It's not going to derail the future of this team or even his trade value.  At the same time, I think they're doing Holliday a disservice. He only played 36 games in AA, and half that in AAA, last year. They didn't even give those leagues the chance to adjust to him. I really, honestly, think they've rushed the kid. I think he's showing that he's not ready offensively, or even defensively at 2B. Heck, I think he's overhyped in general even though I definitely see him eventually as an above average 2B and top of the league leadoff hitter. But he's not the uber athlete, big powerful MOO bat that someone like a Gunnar is. He's more of Jeter profile. That's wonderful, but it's not an ARod profile either and Jeter did what he did with 10/10 intangibles. I think there's more to gain by getting the extra year of service time and making sure he's ready, and I think that way outweighs the risks of losing some value on a guy like Norby.
    • Ideally, sure, but in a situation where you assume that you're only getting 5-6 years from that player before he leaves, I can understand trying to manage their time so that you get the maximum impact out of it.
    • yea McCann has been hot but eventually I would hope to see a better lineup vs lefties. I don't think they will DH Adley all year against them and have Cowser and Mullins play and use a different DH 
    • Do you think that Mountcastle could land us a frontline starting pitcher? Otherwise, there's really no use in trading him. He has been one of the best hitters on the team and is still relatively young. Also, it might take trading Norby AND Stowers to get back a difference making starting pitcher. Would you be comfortable with that? Or do you think it would be better for him to be the 10th - 12th hitter on the team next year. I ask because with so many top level talents/potential star players, the need or use for 10- 12 bench players is not that high (think ATL Braves). However, we are one more top notch starter (especially once Bradish returns) from being the best team in baseball bar none. Plus, if we are not going to resign Burnes, we will need someone up at or near the top of the rotation next season (even if Bradish is there and healthy) if we want to put ourselves in the best position possible to win it all.
    • I think most people’s minds are conditioned that a player has to play everyday. We don’t see teams playing a lot of guys some. We see teams that normally put out the same lineups everyday and play the same players most of the time. But the reality is that shouldn’t be the case.    We also don’t need young guys to come up and play every single day to justify them being here.  They can play 2-4 times a week and get PH appearances.  When the player is “old enough” and has nothing left to prove in the minors, you get them up here even if it’s just on a part time basis for a while until things get figured out.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...