Jump to content

Zach Tonight


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

I know that that's what you thought. But you wrote it as if it as a fact, as though you had some inside information on the matter, as you're doing now by saying that Britton will "probably get demoted" if he doesn't have a good outing. It would help if you put "I think" or "I believe" in front of these proclamations.

I wrote it as a opinion. Anybody that thinks I get to determine what the rankings for the pitcher are is kidding themselves. No one that has been on this board for any time thinks I am an insider. I never claimed to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I wrote it as a opinion.

You wrote it as a fact. You said that he Matusz just moved ahead of Britton. Period. "I think" or "I believe" would have made it written as an opinion. You didn't do that.

Anybody that thinks I get to determine what the rankings for the pitcher are is kidding themselves.

Yeah right, Wildcard. As if that's what I was getting at. You're impossibly manipulative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You wrote it as a fact. You said that he Matusz just moved ahead of Britton. Period. "I think" or "I believe" would have made it written as an opinion. You didn't do that.

Yeah right, Wildcard. As if that's what I was getting at. You're impossibly manipulative.

From now on. Take what ever I write as being an opinion unless I give a source. That is the way I approach. i think many on here do. Its an opinion website that post news articles when they are available.

For you to think I get to set the pitcher ranking ,,,well ,,,,, I think you are have a bad day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From now on. Take what ever I write as being an opinion unless I give a source. That is the way I approach. i think many on here do. Its an opinion website that post news articles when they are available.

For you to think I get to set the pitcher ranking ,,,well ,,,,, I think you are have a bad day.

From now on ...... try taking some responsibility for what you write/wrote, and stop acting like such a troll. I know that you probably won't, but since you gave me a suggestion on how I should interpret your posts, I'll give you one in reference to the way that you act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From now on ...... try taking some responsibility for what you write/wrote, and stop acting like such a troll. I know that you probably won't, but since you gave me a suggestion on how I should interpret your posts, I'll give you one in reference to the way that you act.

I don't think Wildcard is a troll. I think he is wildly optimistic and prone to basing conclusions off of egregiously small samples and frequently disregards data as "unreliable" when it conflicts with his optimistic take on things. But that's not trolling. He's been around forever - if he was a troll he'd be long gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Wildcard is a troll. I think he is wildly optimistic and prone to basing conclusions off of egregiously small samples and frequently disregards data as "unreliable" when it conflicts with his optimistic take on things. But that's not trolling. He's been around forever - if he was a troll he'd be long gone.

I wasn't referring to that. I think that you saw what I was getting at, and it wasn't that I actually believed that he "has a say" in the Orioles' starting rotation. I was saying that he often states things as fact, and acts as though what he is saying is a foregone conclusion (or close to a foregone conclusion). I think that he knew that, too, hence, his acting as though my point was that I actually thought that he had the inside dope on the pitching staff was manipulative and annoying. Maybe that (manipulative and annoying) doesn't constitute trolling, and if that's the case, then my bad on my choice of words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to Zach:

interesting that both of the HRs came on 0-0 pitches where ZB threw a 4-seemer (that's what he claimed in his post-game interview anyways). I was, honestly, rather amazed to see hitters put such good swings on his sinker, but to find out it was his 4-seemer makes a lot of sense. Carter's HR was an impressive piece of hitting, 4-seemer or no, but Zach said he knew they were both hitters who liked to swing 0-0 and that it was a "mental mistake" on his part to throw a 4-seemer as a kind of "get-ahead" pitch on 0-0. In retrospect, I have to agree with him. I was worried I had perhaps overrated the effectiveness of his 2-seemer after the Cleveland game when I saw Oakland putting those kind of swings on him, but I feel a bit better about that after finding out those were 4-seemers.

Still think he has a pretty impressive repertoire and that his 2-seemer, esp. when it's hitting 93-94 and moving like it was against Cleveland, is one of the best in the game. Again, I'm not sure people realize how good we have it with two arms like Britton and Tillman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Wildcard is a troll. I think he is wildly optimistic and prone to basing conclusions off of egregiously small samples and frequently disregards data as "unreliable" when it conflicts with his optimistic take on things. But that's not trolling. He's been around forever - if he was a troll he'd be long gone.

I agree with this. I think wildcard is generally a good guy. Like LJ said, he has wildly optimistic opinions at times......but that's just who he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough first inning for Zach. Hope he buckles down. Hold the Yanks to those two runs.

Tillman, Britton, Matusz and Arrietta all under achieving. I just don't see how that is possible with their stuff. We need Rick Kranitz back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don't think we can have this discussion and stay within board rules. I also think we would all be speculating about things we probably shouldn't.
    • I think this sums it up extremely well. I don't have faith any more that any of these guys from the GM down are any better than anyone else. They just seem average and flawed to me, all the way down to the players (and in the case of our prospects, well below average and incredibly flawed). I'll hope for the best, but they did an excellent job killing any positive expectations I have for this group going forward.  And that is the hardest pill to swallow from last night and the last half season. At least the 1969 Os fans had 1970, and the 1979 Os fans had 1983.  Baseball blue balls is the perfect way to describe the last 40 years of fandom.
    • If Elias and company don't much this offseason, we will not finish .500 next year and a wasted year in 2025!!
    • I dont mean to use your post...but something uncharacteristically negative happened has me thinking about a question I want to ask but feel it will cause a political storm.  So I am not raising this question to start a debate on an issue, but I am genuinely curious. What happened to the Orioles sometime in June seemed to be that they no longer were a cohesive unit.  Yes there were injuries.  But injuries can also bring tight groups together.  This group that has seemed tight almost seemed to splinter.  Sure winning is fun and when it stops nothing is as fun.  But it seems like something could have happened that internally split this group apart.  Did it?  Whatever IT would be happened sometime in June before the All Star Break.  Until then things were rolling and Gunnar was raising the question of whether he was having the best season by a SS ever.   So what started the slide? Did it start after the Yankee Series in NY after a 17-5 win on June 20 with the Orioles leaving town after taking 2 of 3?  The Orioles went to Houston and lost three straight before returning to Baltimore and losing 2 straight to Cleveland before righting the ship and taking game three. Then Orioles played well at times after but never again played like a team in command.  So I went back and saw that the Texas series began on 6/27 with an 11-2 game started by Burnes (7 innings 88 Pitches) and included HRs by Mullins, Kjerstad, Rutschman and Cowser and in looking at all of that I saw something that I honestly had completely forgotten about. On June 27, the Orioles hosted the Rangers and began an MLB sponsored Pride Week.  Not really a bid deal, most all MLB teams and professional teams do.  Like it.  Hate it.  They all do it.  But I also saw the post that Austin Hays put out that same day on instagram.  He didn't say anything specific about the Pride events, he shared a religious point of view that spoke about evil.  The links were not direct, but obvious.   Cut to today.  The Orioles have never regained the superiority they held over everyone prior to June.  Hays...is gone.  I know he was an obvious trade candidate.  I thought the idea of trading him was fine.  But my question is did the events around Pride Night June 27 somehow cause a fracture in a clubhouse?   And please I am not saying it did.  I am simply a fan who is stuggling to see what broke.  I mean I see what broke.  But why?  The Red Sox collapse in 2011 had pizza and beer and locker room drama that came out after the fact to explain their epic collapse.  The didn't become excellent chokers magically on Sept 3 with a 9 game lead and then totally miss the playoffs when the Great Andino drove in the final nail. Something broke, it spread and it ate everything. I just think it is more likely something interpersonal happened in the clubhouse than the franchise approach that was working stopped.  Or that all of MLB found a way to turn Henderson from a player on a 12 WAR pace to one who struggled to field, throw, hit and run.   So my question to the GM and Manager would be.  Did something happen in mid June that affected the psyche of this team and was it related to the June 27 post by Austin Hays on the first night of Pride Week?  Thank you and I'll take your answer off line.
    • I don't really consider it choking when a team that has struggled for several months loses two games in a row.  The O's went 29-37 since July 7 (the date when they tied their best W/L margin for the season).  The offense had showed the ability to go utterly MIA some time after the All Star Break.  This was just more of that.
    • My take on the clutch thing is, clutchness/unclutchness can both be real things based on the human factors at hand, and it isn’t all just sequencing luck. But also 1) A guy’s clutchness can change from month to month and season to season just like a guy might have better or worse barrel rates at different times because of subtle changes in approach. 2) Observers are far too quick to say someone IS clutch/unclutch, definitively, instead of having had a clutch/unclutch performance in a certain window. 3) Other parts of baseball talent are way more predictable and steady than clutchness. So you don’t build your team by chasing what you perceive to be clutchness. 
    • This is the key issue.  Easier to hit when everyone is hitting, pitching is mediocre and there is less pressure.  What creates pressure?  Good pitching, slumps, injuries and trying to shoe horn in young, not ready players.  All of that amps up in the post season.   It is on coaches to manage player egos and mindset and GM to acquire players to fill needs.  Both Elias and Hyde squandered a big opportunity this year.   Teams don’t win 100 games or play at a 100 win pace by accident or fluke.  The 2nd half was more than enough of a sample size to judge the team’s readiness to take the next step.   Ironically they managed a pretty dreadful pitching situation fairly well - frontline starter injuries and BP /depth/implosion issues, even better when you consider the team was only average defensively.  The hitting/lineup was a disaster in judgment, coaching and performance. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...