Jump to content

Wieters is pretty bad offensively


Pedro Cerrano

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I remember when he hit really well in his first spring training and an anonymous teammate was quoted as saying "that is the softest .400 I have ever seen." And its true. He's got to have the longest, laziest swing in baseball. Most of his hits (rare as such a thing might be) are lazy bloopers into the shallow outfield. I think it's time that we all realize that he's never going to be a star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know guys! I know he is struggling mightily left handed this year. His right handed swing still looks pretty good. But it is shorter and more compact than the left handed version. If only he could transfer that to the other side.

Being a switch hitter myself when I played I had the same problem only in reverse. My power side was my right side and I got into alot of bad habits on that side of the plate.

I think he might have to rework some things left handed. But I don't think it is something that is undoable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a hitting coach but it looks to be all about timing, which I guess you could say about any hitter. No reason a man with his talent should be hitting this poor from the left side. Looks like he isn't letting the ball get deep as they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah I know, I was referring to this blurb in MLBTR: I was just saying that once there was a lawsuit at all, I'm sure MLB was looking to get him out of the game.
    • Listen … I realize the game was never in jeopardy. But, you got exactly from this guy what his recent performance.    I’m shocked Elias and Hyde would waste time on these types of guys. Not much different that the guy… Ramirez I think that they picked up and then released earlier this season. We didn’t give up anything substantial and the must love him.    
    • Well, I already addressed that in my just-now comment, but when you know a guy is terrible, AND you know he’s not going more then an inning ANYWAY, you have another guy ready immediately.   There was nothing to learn, btw. He’s bad. Maybe he’s fine for the Rockies or White Sox, but not for a team looking at 100+ wins.  
    • You know he lost the discrimination case years ago, right?   There was no settlement.  The lawsuit was dismissed by the court for lack of merit.  
    • Chances are one of the reasons they can even think about the wildcard is because of their bullpen.  I doubt they weaken that looking for offense.  The first obvious move is to call up uber prospect James Wood who’s tearing up AAA.   If they truly are thinking wildcard they won’t subtract to add.  They’ll just add.
    • With respect, I totally disagree. Experience isn’t just what you’ve done, its what you haven’t done when given an opportunity. Looking at his body of work, it is littered with failed opportunity. there was literally nothing to suggest Viera would suddenly be other then he has been, and he wasn’t. As I said, it would have been fine to DFA him, stick him in the minors after he cleared waivers, and experiment a bit. And if he gets claimed, who cares, because he’s not the main part of the trade. And it wasn’t just adding Viera and his career -.3 WaR, but subtracting  Vespi, who in very limited MLB experience (35 innings) has a .3 WAR. Viera has 51 MLB innings(22 this season) with a career 1.7 WHIP, and 1.9 WHIP this season. There’s no reason to expect anything other than he did. So, you da man, Frobby, but we’re voting different parties on this one. Adding Viera quite literally made the bullpen worse, and probably was a huge slap in Vespi’s face to boot.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...