Jump to content

Mark Reynolds OPS is .731...


EagleOriole

Recommended Posts

This is crap. Mark Reynolds is crap. His glove is crap. His plate approach is crap. He doesn't belong on the roster, we are a better team without him. Please move on. Oh wait, Angelos won't eat his salary. Frustrating.

Fixed that for him....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 364
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Gregg and Reynolds equal about $4.1 million dollars in remaining salary if my calculation is correct. Asking PA to pay salaries to players no longer on the team has happened before. Will he do it soon and let DD add two players that can help us the final two months?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair I've been impressed with his glove the past week or so.

Was just about to say this. He has made some good digs at first and helped make what were good plays even better by digging out low throws.

I keep waiting for him to wake up and start knocking the snot out of the ball but it hasn't happened. I don't think we have anyone in the org who could improve upon a 687 ops, so what are you going to do?

If we had kept Pearce I would have started him in LF and moved David back to first, but that is just rearranging deck chairs. Something permanent needs to be done at first this offseason. It's amazing that Raffy back in 1998 was the last good 1b we had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was just about to say this. He has made some good digs at first and helped make what were good plays even better by digging out low throws.

I keep waiting for him to wake up and start knocking the snot out of the ball but it hasn't happened. I don't think we have anyone in the org who could improve upon a 687 ops, so what are you going to do?

If we had kept Pearce I would have started him in LF and moved David back to first, but that is just rearranging deck chairs. Something permanent needs to be done at first this offseason. It's amazing that Raffy back in 1998 was the last good 1b we had.

I cd still see "David" at first base once Goliath's neck feels better and he can DH again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OPS is .681.

Yeah, and he still gets on base at a .323 clip. For a lineup that quite frankly sucks at working the count and taking walks, a .120 point separation between batting average and on base percentage is great.

I've said it before, anyone who thinks this year is a true measure of Reynolds power is foolish. Look at what happened to Adam Dunn between last year and this year. Some people have bad seasons, it happens.

There's no reason to think that Reynolds couldn't bounce back next year and provide another 35+ homer season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, and he still gets on base at a .323 clip. For a lineup that quite frankly sucks at working the count and taking walks, a .120 point separation between batting average and on base percentage is great.

I've said it before, anyone who thinks this year is a true measure of Reynolds power is foolish. Look at what happened to Adam Dunn between last year and this year. Some people have bad seasons, it happens.

There's no reason to think that Reynolds couldn't bounce back next year and provide another 35+ homer season.

I agree with everything you are saying, but Reynolds is hitting .185/.292/.340 vs. RHP. It is time to sit him against right-handers. If he starts swinging the bat better, power is starting to come then put him back in the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you are saying, but Reynolds is hitting .185/.292/.340 vs. RHP. It is time to sit him against right-handers. If he starts swinging the bat better, power is starting to come then put him back in the lineup.

I don't disagree with that and I think that'll happen when Thome gets back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, and he still gets on base at a .323 clip. For a lineup that quite frankly sucks at working the count and taking walks, a .120 point separation between batting average and on base percentage is great.

I've said it before, anyone who thinks this year is a true measure of Reynolds power is foolish. Look at what happened to Adam Dunn between last year and this year. Some people have bad seasons, it happens.

There's no reason to think that Reynolds couldn't bounce back next year and provide another 35+ homer season.

Interesting points.

I agree, his OBP is impressive. especially when you compare it to his batting average.

Reynolds has endured both a fielding and batting slump this season. In addition, he suffered an oblique injury earlier in the year that has affected him more than anyone has let on. So, you're right, anyone can have a bad season.

He could bounce back, but I would not give him a 6 million dollar option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you're a fan because he controls the strike zone, but Mark has been pretty abysmal this year at the plate. He looks almost totally lost to me at this point. Good guy by all accounts, but I'd just as soon move on.

Honestly, I'm not that big a fan. But it ticks me off when people totally ignore the value of getting on base via a walk. We won a game today because Reynolds got on base that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting points.

I agree, his OBP is impressive. especially when you compare it to his batting average.

Reynolds has endured both a fielding and batting slump this season. In addition, he suffered an oblique injury earlier in the year that has affected him more than anyone has let on. So, you're right, anyone can have a bad season.

He could bounce back, but I would not give him a 6 million dollar option.

Well if that's what it'd cost to keep him, I'd be a little wary of that figure. Then again, the Orioles once gave Jay Payton 10 million over 2 years.

But yeah, anyone can have a bad season and he's been having a horrible one. He's not that great of a defender but last year I believe people let it pass due to the power numbers he put up.

He's not doing much of anything right this year, but at least he makes pitchers throw pitches and takes walks. He's got an approach that I wish more Orioles had.

He is no doubt the prime whipping boy of the 2012 Orioles but after the season he had last year I'm willing to give this year a pass. Before this year you could pencil him in for at least 30 homers a year and everyone around here used to whine incessantly about how we didn't have a big thumper in our lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why Reynolds is still on the team. It's time to bring up Joe Mahoney and put him at 1B. He bats LH, but his stats show he hits LH pitching as well as RH, and he is excellent defensively. He can do better that Reynolds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
    • My point was an overly uppercut swing isn't going to result in that low a launch angle.  Not unless he is somehow consistently topping the pitches, which seems pretty unlikely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...