Jump to content

When Will Double Digit Strikeouts in A Game Stop?


section18

Recommended Posts

11 more strikeouts tonight. Reynolds? What can you say? 3 more strikeouts....2 looking. Does he want his release so he can take the rest of the summer off? Andino looked at a pitch over the center of the plate with two strikes in the 9th for naturally......strike three. We've seen this act at least 10 times from him this season.

Have we improved in the won-loss column in games after a day off? I know we had 8 hits but few in the late innings. 10 left on base tonight. Double digits in strikeouts and double digits in men left on base. That's a bad combination. Rick Dempsey just hit it right on the head during the postgame show. He said in little league we were taught not to loook at stike three with two strikes and the ball is close to the plate. I was taught the same thing. I guess when you get paid you don't have to follow that rule.

I've mentioned before about having him get his eyes checked. Someone followed that up a few days ago with......but he walks a lot. What's the old saying...sometimes a blind squirrel finds a nut! There are times he appears to be squinting in the dugout and at the plate. Maybe he wears contacts and needs them adjusted. Something is wrong. How do you drop from 37 HR's to single digits overnight? He lost weight......that's the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

When we stop throwing out a lineup of low on base percentage strikeout guys. Reynolds, Davis, Hardy, Wieters, and Andino strike out way too much for their power numbers although at least Davis has a little pop. It's a slow, lumbering lineup that doesn't get on base, doesn't do the little things like moving runners over or just making contact. This lineup needs to be significantly overhauled before the Orioles will be serious contenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck was just asked about the strikeouts on the postgame and he said sometimes their emotions get in the way and they try to do too much. Really! Really! Emotions? I don't care if they are looking for a 95 mph fast ball and they get a changeup. Swing the dam bat. You might dink one over the infielders head. We all remember Guerrero hit a ball that bounced in front of the plate and he got a hit against us a few years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we stop throwing out a lineup of low on base percentage strikeout guys. Reynolds, Davis, Hardy, Wieters, and Andino strike out way too much for their power numbers although at least Davis has a little pop. It's a slow, lumbering lineup that doesn't get on base, doesn't do the little things like moving runners over or just making contact. This lineup needs to be significantly overhauled before the Orioles will be serious contenders.

Davis is fine. He's a good hitter, but streaky, and would get a lot less slack if there weren't so many other hitters on our team like him.

Hardy will keep getting better IMO. He's a good hitter that was just in a prolonged slump.

Agree with Reynolds, Andino and Wieters though. Andino seems to enjoy looking at two pitches an at bat right down the middle, then swinging while stepping out of the box.

I really liked Reynolds and thought he would turn it around, but he's just not seeing the ball like he usually does. He's swinging through pitches he normally hits 400 plus feet, and whole he always used to strike out a lot, it seems a lot more are now looking. At least he has a decent OBP I guess. He looks unconfident. He's been swinging a bit better lately, so I'm willing to give him a little bit longer to see if he can turn it around. He could carry the team offensively if he gets hot though.

And boy Wieters is really pissing me off. He just looks overmatched and over whelmed at the plate. He hits the ball hard once a week, can't catch up to a decent-good fastball, and swings through so many good hitters pitches. Idk what went wrong with him but he looks like a catcher who got to the majors because of his defense, at the plate, and IMO he looks very under confident when he's hitting. I don't think I've ever seen anyone hit the ball so softly, so consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck was just asked about the strikeouts on the postgame and he said sometimes their emotions get in the way and they try to do too much. Really! Really! Emotions? I don't care if they are looking for a 95 mph fast ball and they get a changeup. Swing the dam bat. You might dink one over the infielders head. We all remember Guerrero hit a ball that bounced in front of the plate and he got a hit against us a few years ago.

What does this have to do with anything? Are you suggesting that O's hitters should swing at pitches that bounce in front of them? Vlad was a freak of nature, but not someone whose plate discipline should be emulated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • That is the big question. I had assumed it would be pretty long, especially with him wearing Cal Ripken Sr's old number and him being the consensus top prospect in Baseball. But if there's been no progress in all that playing time, and it's starting to cost us games, I don't know how the team can take the brunt of that for too long. Especially in a chase for a championship inside the toughest division in baseball.  The Front Office has surprised me before by looking like they were being patient with a guy only to suddenly option him one day without warning they would.  If we're being perfectly honest Jackson looks like a boy playing amongst men out their right now and he looks like he belongs in the minor leagues with a reset for now until he gathers up experience like Westburg and Norby, or at least as much as Henderson did. So, we will probably watch Jackson ride the bench vs Ragans tomorrow. What happens after that is something we will just have to wait and see. I'm willing to cut him some slack, but if it continues to cost us runs and games, then there's not much room for patience.
    • Hicks was a big blessing to the team--we're very lucky we got him when we did. There's no way the Cowser we saw last year could have matched what Hicks provided, even on defense and on the basepaths. You cite BABIP, but drawing 35 walks in 236 plate appearances was a huge self-earned positive.
    • I had to think about it because Adley has always been a high priority for me. He's the franchise Catcher we never had. And in my opinion, the Catcher position is the Quarterback of a Baseball team. It's that impactful of a position and you need a good one to compete for championships. But with that said, Burnes is the Ace we've been waiting for since Mussina turned coat, and his contract is up at the end of the season. He's also one of the most reliable and durable pitchers in baseball. I think we should do what we can to keep him happy and make a business deal with him to keep him an Orioles pitcher.   If you're assuming that Rodriguez or Bradish will take over the Ace role, I think you've seen enough pitching injuries this year to tell you that you can't assume that will happen. You need to make sure any one of your top 3 starters can assume the #1 spot if pressed. Timing dictates Burnes as our biggest priority to work on. With Gunnar, he might be a future MVP and I've been one of his biggest fans since the moment he was called up. But his agent is Scott Boras, so good luck getting him to agree to an extension before free agency. And on that note, you'll have Scott Boras with a conflict of interest when you're trying to sign both Gunnar Henderson and Jackson Holiday long term and they both want to play shortstop.
    • People keep talking about Norby's flawed defense, meanwhile Holliday is looking pretty bad out there. Small sample size, I guess! But how long is the leash?
    • the Royals gave us the business tonight...except for the slam by Adley...we stunk to high hell tonight...especially the pen...Akin and  Tate...they both came up small.
    • I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion.
    • The way he is pitching that's like throwing gas on a fire.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...