Jump to content

Will Machado hit for power?


Fired-Up

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Because the Orioles desperately need a superstar.

By asking this question on here, are you assuring to yourself or anyone that he becomes one? He's 20, and scouting is an inexact science. Who knows how he'll grow, what he grows out of and into! No one will be able to give you an answer that is any more than 50% likely to be correct (yes, or no). So why does it matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If 35 homers is your definition of power, I hate to break it to you, but there were only 8 power hitters in all of baseball last year.

If Johnny Bench was your expectation for Wieters, I hate to break it to you, but Wieters is not going to be the best catcher in the history of the game.

Don't bury Machado with unfair ARod expectations. Just don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If 35 homers is your definition of power, I hate to break it to you, but there were only 8 power hitters in all of baseball last year.

If Johnny Bench was your expectation for Wieters, I hate to break it to you, but Wieters is not going to be the best catcher in the history of the game.

Don't bury Machado with unfair ARod expectations. Just don't.

You're giving him too much credit. Analyze his take:

1. Machado doesn't have good bat speed. He may not have power.

2. Mark Reynolds hit 44 HRs. He clearly has good bat speed.

It's not worth responding to - he has no scouting acumen, no sample size, and no idea what he's talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're giving him too much credit. Analyze his take:

1. Machado doesn't have good bat speed. He may not have power.

2. Mark Reynolds hit 44 HRs. He clearly has good bat speed.

It's not worth responding to - he has no scouting acumen, no sample size, and no idea what he's talking about.

You are right. He is not worth the characters on my screen. I'm going to get another glass of wine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're giving him too much credit. Analyze his take:

1. Machado doesn't have good bat speed. He may not have power.

2. Mark Reynolds hit 44 HRs. He clearly has good bat speed.

It's not worth responding to - he has no scouting acumen, no sample size, and no idea what he's talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're giving him too much credit. Analyze his take:

1. Machado doesn't have good bat speed. He may not have power.

2. Mark Reynolds hit 44 HRs. He clearly has good bat speed.

It's not worth responding to - he has no scouting acumen, no sample size, and no idea what he's talking about.

Hitters tend to generate power in two ways. It's either the Curtis Granderson way, a little guy who has a lightning quick bat. Or it's either a huge massive guy like Cabrera who uses his brute strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hitters tend to generate power in two ways. It's either the Curtis Granderson way, a little guy who has a lightning quick bat. Or it's either a huge massive guy like Cabrera who uses his brute strength.

Does Albert Pujols have great bat speed?

Better, did Albert Pujols in his prime have great bat speed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If 35 homers is your definition of power, I hate to break it to you, but there were only 8 power hitters in all of baseball last year.

If Johnny Bench was your expectation for Wieters, I hate to break it to you, but Wieters is not going to be the best catcher in the history of the game.

Don't bury Machado with unfair ARod expectations. Just don't.

Agreed. Hitting 15 to 20 less homers doesn't make you a low-quality ballplayer. If he gets on base and moves runners forward at a consistent rate, is that not valuable? Why does every next big name have to put up 35 homers also?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Kjerstad does not have to play every day for him to be here.  He should be able to start 3+ times a week. He’s hitting right now so I would get him in the lineup immediately and see if there is any carry over from AAA.  
    • They needed to replace Hays and he's already on the 40. I don't think it goes much deeper.
    • A lot of people didn’t like this signing.  It was a few bad outings last year but otherwise, he was very good. He will have some bumps in the road but he’s a very capable guy still.
    • I agree. It has to be anticipating Mountcastle being out a little longer, maybe they will IL him too if his knee doesn’t improve quickly. But if Hays is out the minimum 10 days (one of which already passed), maybe Kjerstad gets 3 starts from Mountcastle and 1-2 from rest days for others, available to pinch hit the rest. That wouldn’t be so bad. 
    • I trust the O’s and Elias’ handling of him.  Similar to Decosta and the Ravens, they seem to make more good decisions than other clubs do.     I think he can work it out at the major league level if they do.  Wouldn’t be worried if he got sent down to regain some confidence.
    • I don’t see Wells coming back to the rotation. That was never the plan to begin with. Also, I’m not sure it’s a given that Means can make effective starts at the Bug League level right now. He’s been legit terrible against AAA hitters on a pretty consistent basis so far this season. Now Bradish on the other hand, if he can return, he will probably bump one of Suarez or Irvin to the pen (the one who is pitching the worse).  If Suarez keeps performing (I don’t think his current level is realistic to expect) but at a good level for a back end starter, he stays.
    • Remove Bradish and I will maybe agree. To me this guy is destined for the pen, where hopefully his swing and miss stuff plays up even more. Could be an important piece, but I’m not getting my hopes up too far after two appearances.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...