Jump to content

Boras being Boras - Eye Opening Quotes on the Strasburg situation


Burg

Recommended Posts

Did anyone catch this article from Mike Wise? He argues that Strasburg should be shut down because it's what Boras wants and, well, he's Scott Boras. This just rubs me the wrong way. The power that this **** has is just ridiculous and the fact that he is portrayed as looking out for his client's health rather than protecting his asset (and thereby his commission) is just comical.

The two gems from Boras that stick out to me are:

1. The Nats should shut down Strasburg or Boras will no longer send "his" players to their organization; and

2. If the Nats don't shut down Strasburg and he hurts himself, they could be legally liable for negligence or as Scott says " “The fact of the matter is, if you are forcing your player to pitch and disregarding medical doctors, are you going to be able to live with that legally and ethically?”.

Really? So if he gets hurt during inning 181 Boras will recommend a negligence lawsuit? Disgusting.

Link here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/agent-scott-boras-defends-stephen-strasburg-shutdown-decision/2012/08/17/16f9b078-e887-11e1-a3d2-2a05679928ef_story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The power that this **** has is just ridiculous and the fact that he is portrayed as looking out for his client's health rather than protecting his asset (and thereby his commission) is just comical.

It's the same thing. Why wouldn't Boras try to protect Strasburg's health? That's one of his meal tickets. Actually, this is a big part of being an agent, advocating in your client's best interests against things a club might do to damage his interests. If he gets Dusty Baker'd, imagine how much money he would stand to lose.

1. The Nats should shut down Strasburg or Boras will no longer send "his" players to their organization; and

2. If the Nats don't shut down Strasburg and he hurts himself, they could be legally liable for negligence or as Scott says " “The fact of the matter is, if you are forcing your player to pitch and disregarding medical doctors, are you going to be able to live with that legally and ethically?”.

Really? So if he gets hurt during inning 181 Boras will recommend a negligence lawsuit? Disgusting.

Well, as far as #1 goes, I would imagine this happens already if a team gets a bad reputation for player development. Again, he's the advocate, why wouldn't he warn his client that "hey, this team will run you into the ground" if that's what he thinks will happen?

As far as number two, I doubt he can even do that, it's just silly posturing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?I told Rizzo, ?I?ll be honest with you, you got a guy who is a No. 1 pitcher. There are only a few of them in the game. He?s worth $30 million dollars a year,? Boras said. ?You have four years that cost you $120 million dollars. Because of the reserve system, you only have to pay $40 million dollars. So you have an $80 million dollar decision of profit ? in an asset that you have under your control.

The Nats are a team on the rise now, but how will it work when Strasburg and Harper hit free agency. I wonder if Boras will give the Nats discounts on the 10 year/$300 million contracts that he will want for them. I don't want any player agent, much less Boras acting as co-GM of the Orioles.

What players other than Wieters have Boras as agents. It does make me think if Boras feels Wieters is overworked he won't be signing her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?I told Rizzo, ?I?ll be honest with you, you got a guy who is a No. 1 pitcher. There are only a few of them in the game. He?s worth $30 million dollars a year,? Boras said. ?You have four years that cost you $120 million dollars. Because of the reserve system, you only have to pay $40 million dollars. So you have an $80 million dollar decision of profit ? in an asset that you have under your control.

The Nats are a team on the rise now, but how will it work when Strasburg and Harper hit free agency. I wonder if Boras will give the Nats discounts on the 10 year/$300 million contracts that he will want for them. I don't want any player agent, much less Boras acting as co-GM of the Orioles.

What players other than Wieters have Boras as agents. It does make me think if Boras feels Wieters is overworked he won't be signing her.

With all due respect to Wieters, who I love, I have to say, him being a client of Boras actually makes me think a little less of Matt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boras can only throw his weight around as much as the player will let him. Boras is an employee of the player, not vice-versa.

When it comes to this stuff being said about Strasburg and the Nationals, Strasburg is as guilty as Boras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Well of course it did cost Seattle their 1,3, 5 prospects to now be in a position to sign him to this pre free agent deal 
    • I'm keeping an open mind watching Orioles Player Development unfold, but my decision using possibly antiquated thinking is that Gunnar Henderson is NOT a MLB shortstop because the org didn't deploy him there primarily as a minor leaguer. Just write him into 3B and a plum lineup spot as long as you can.    It saves a Jackson Holliday headache in two years to boot.     Urias-Stowers is a nice half of a bench if we block them by getting say somebody like Michael Brantley to take professional at-bats as a primary DH.
    • Again .. a bit of a false equivalency.  The difference is .050 OPS between our proposals.  Now if Elias was going to sign a big bat free agent third baseman I would agree .  I doubt he is.  But i would risk the .050 on the combo of Henderson at 3rd and Mateo at short over Urias (arb eligible in 2024) at 3rd and Gunnar at short.  To take the admitted risk that Mateo hits a bit better.. if not, Gunnar can take over at that point at ss.    But it is a good problem to have and I can see it going your way too. 
    • No, but I think the team will bet the same way I am.  Henderson has the talent to be an above average SS.   We have a lot of infielders in the system who can hit.  There’s no reason to have a defensive only SS.  
    • Back of napkin I guess this is around $24 AAV for  FA years if its judged 1/12 for Arb3 and 4/96 for FA seasons 1.1 years out. Castillo-Ray-Gausman-Berrios-Musgrove are for me kind of a flat basket as Mountcastle-Mancini-Mullins-Hays-Santander were for me as the supporting cast of the early Adley teams. The industry seems to have some consensus what this kind of house is worth.
    • I don't get why every hitter has to see Bautista's splitter.  Pretty much all the hits off Bautista were on his splitter, Tucker  had to figure it was coming, I'm sitting there knowing it is coming.  Not sure there are bad 100 mph fastballs, but I know there are bad splitters.
    • Your comparison seems to assume that Henderson can be as good a glove at SS as Rutschman is behind the plate. I think that has not been proven yet.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...