Jump to content

Orioles don't like the cutter (part deuce) - Peterson speaks


CA-ORIOLE

Recommended Posts

It strikes me as odd to have an organizational philosophy that could result in a staff that over time all feature the same pitches. Wouldn't you want diversity of offerings in your pitchers in accordance with their individual strengths - rather than everyone being shoehorned in to the same approach regardless of what's worked for them over the course of their pitching lives?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It strikes me as odd to have an organizational philosophy that could result in a staff that over time all feature the same pitches. Wouldn't you want diversity of offerings in your pitchers in accordance with their individual strengths - rather than everyone being shoehorned in to the same approach regardless of what's worked for them over the course of their pitching lives?

I would like a strategy that offers the best opportunity for our pitchers to succeed at the ML level. Our most successful pitchers right now: Hammel, Chen, Gonzalez, Tillman basically throw the same variety of pitches. I'm guessing these acquisitions and refinements were by design. I don't see a problem with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't pretend to know anything about the development of pitchers and Peterson certainly has my confidence, but it still seems crazy to me to shelve a prospect's best pitch. I understood it when I thought they were just trying to get him to develop his change up and when I thought he was still throwing it in side sessions. This, though, I don't really understand. Guess I'll defer to the pros on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Bundy's best pitch is a cutter, then unless he is going to be a RP I don't think he'll be very successful at the ML level. I can't think of many SP who throw primarily cutters and get through 6-7 innings with that. Mo gets through one or two innings at most with his, and his is better than Bundy's, I'm pretty sure. If Bundy wants to succeed then his best pitch better become his FB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Bundy's best pitch is a cutter, then unless he is going to be a RP I don't think he'll be very successful at the ML level. I can't think of many SP who throw primarily cutters and get through 6-7 innings with that. Mo gets through one or two innings at most with his, and his is better than Bundy's, I'm pretty sure. If Bundy wants to succeed then his best pitch better become his FB.

Riveria is the only MLB pitcher I know that that throws primarily cutters. Just because a certain pitch is better then the others doesn't mean it gets thrown a majority of the time. Does Cole Hammels or Johan Santana throw more change ups then fastballs?

Your post makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Becoming a free agent as soon as possible seems a lot more likely since we've taken away his favorite pitch for good. I know he and his father already aren't happy about it.

How do you know this information? If you have answered already, thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outsider looking in, but based on fans of various teams I've talked to, we all all seem to be unanimous in absolutely hating this decision. It's one thing to take it away while he works on his other pitches, but to take away his best pitch forever due to something as ridiculous as saying young pitchers don't need to throw cutters is something else. If they want to keep him from throwing it 30 times a game, I get that, but 10-15 times is completely reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outsider looking in, but based on fans of various teams I've talked to, we all all seem to be unanimous in absolutely hating this decision. It's one thing to take it away while he works on his other pitches, but to take away his best pitch forever due to something as ridiculous as saying young pitchers don't need to throw cutters is something else. If they want to keep him from throwing it 30 times a game, I get that, but 10-15 times is completely reasonable.

Ah, yes, but "reasonable" based on what? Popular opinion? I think Peterson has made his case on this decision. Time will tell if it was a good one or not. I'm not going to pretend to know more about this then Rick Peterson, but I'm certainly not going side with "fans of other teams" over him either. The guy has seemingly saved Chris Tillman and turned a 27yr old journeyman into a ML starter. He gets the benefit of doubt for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outsider looking in, but based on fans of various teams I've talked to, we all all seem to be unanimous in absolutely hating this decision. It's one thing to take it away while he works on his other pitches, but to take away his best pitch forever due to something as ridiculous as saying young pitchers don't need to throw cutters is something else. If they want to keep him from throwing it 30 times a game, I get that, but 10-15 times is completely reasonable.

Well, I think you have to be a bit of two minds of this.

First, they've never said he can't throw it again. And frankly, if he gets the the MLs and wants to start throwing it again, how are they going to stop him?

Secondly, it's a matter of development. If they think he's better served to shelve it in the MiLs, then that isn't exactly a unique opinion on the development of a starter.

So, on the one hand, a dogmatic approach of no cutters ever, is likely the wrong one.

On the other hand, no cutters for a developing pitcher, is a lot more ambiguous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may be his best pitch to go along with a 96 mph fastball, but everything starts with the fastball. A 88 mph pitch off a 96 mph fastball is extremely effective in high school because High school hitters can't hit a 96 moh pitch. If throwing the cutter causes the fastball to go down to 91, how effective would a 88 mph change be built off a 91 mph fastball?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...