Jump to content

Who is your Orioles MVP this year?


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Lots of potential candidates but no one really stands out.

If forced to choose I would go with Jim Johnson. The strength of this team has been the bullpen, and Johnson is the anchor of the bullpen. Take away 2 very bad outings in which he gave up 11 runs in 0.2 IP and his numbers are ridiculous.

I'm sure the WARlords will not like that answer, but I'll take him as my MVP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of potential candidates but no one really stands out.

If forced to choose I would go with Jim Johnson. The strength of this team has been the bullpen, and Johnson is the anchor of the bullpen. Take away 2 very bad outings in which he gave up 11 runs in 0.2 IP and his numbers are ridiculous.

I'm sure the WARlords will not like that answer, but I'll take him as my MVP.

So you don't think that Strop could do pretty much what JJ has done this season? Because he has, just in the 8th not the 9th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you get that from what he wrote? Giving Johnson his due doesn't have to be perceived as a slight to Strop, who has also been valuable.

That isn't the point I was making. How can JJ be the MVP when Strop could give you close to the same performance if he was in the same role?

Johnson to me has been a fine bullpen arm this season but so have a number of other guys, he shouldn't be the MVP solely based on the roles assigned by Buck.

If you eliminate saves from the equation what is there about JJ's numbers that elevate him from the rest of the bullpen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • It kind of is... they got exposed by Texas and Cleveland. Don't get me wrong, I am thoroughly enjoying this season's success and I didn't think they were going to win 100+ games this year but I just don't think that they have enough to compete for a playoff spot with the current roster, specifically the pitching and hitting against LH pitching.    Overall they are so much better than last year but the bullpen is already showing signs it may not hold up over 162 games (they're over worked because the starters aren't consistently going deep enough into games) and while the offensive numbers were encouraging in April, they tailed off a lot in May as they ran into some good teams with good pitching and Jorge gave them virtually nothing over the 28 games. Mostly though, I just don't have confidence that management is fully committed to doing what would be required to win this year.   They only have to play .500 baseball the rest of the way to finish the year 88-74. That's pretty outstanding considering that they lost 110 games two years back. If they're two games better than that they'll win 90 games, which will probably not be enough to get them into the post-season, which was supposed to be the goal this year.    So, on some level the sky is falling @Frobby
    • What you say sounds reasonable to me. I would add that prospect/young player growth is not linear. There can be peaks and valleys as they adjust to the Majors. In saying that some may start out hot like Gunnar did at the end of last season and then have a point where they regress/struggle. It’s not always an upward tragectory.
    • The Ironbirds have been doing better since my April 28 post, with a record of 23-24, 16-14 since that post.  The pitching has improved a lot, going from 4.97 ERA (7th in the Sally League) to 4.01 (5th) over the last month.  Big contributors have included Jean Pinto (2.34 ERA), Alex Pham (2.21), Ryan Long (2.27) and Jake Lyons (2.56).    Jackson Holliday has cooled off a bit the last 10 games or so, but his OPS still stands at 1.100.   Max Wagner has been on fire, raising his OPS from .457 as of April 28 to .774 now (he’s actually cooled off the last week).   Jud Fabian is up to .816 OPS, while Dylan Beavers has been scuffling, down to .670.  Creed Willems was promoted this week and will be interesting to follow.    
    • Agree about the case by case basis, and that Cowser would already be here if he hadn't unfortunately been injured at the same time as Mullins.  There's also always a risk in not calling up players who might be improvements. We'll never know how 2022/3 could have been different if Grayson had joined the O's last May when he was pitching excellently at AAA. 
    • Monthly check-in on the Baysox.  Their record now is 17-29, having gone 11-15 since May 2 when I started this thread.  Kjerstad (.933 OPS), Mayo (.908) and Prieto (.877) continue to take, and T.T. Bowen (1.001) has supplied a much needed fourth bat since joining the Baysox on May 16.   Not much else going on offensively.   On the pitching side, dull but steady Justin Armbruester is quietly plugging along with a brilliant 1.40 ERA but an unsexy 7.0 K rate, while his polar opposite, Cade Povich, bounces back and forth between great starts and terrible ones, so that his pedestrian 4.50 ERA is mismatched with a 13.7 K/9.     There are a number of guys at Aberdeen who may be in line for promotion to Bowie, not the least of whom is Jackson Holliday.  The team could use some reinforcements.   
    • I agree that Gunnar's performance is probably similar to many other rookies around the league.  And I agree that Elias has said that recently. Adley was the #1 prospect in the country.  He slumped in May 2022 for a 529 OPS.   By the end of June he had 129 PA and a 775 OPS.  And he kept going up from there. I don't think it would have surprised Elias if Gunnar as the #1 prospect had done the same.  But he hasn't.  The Gunnar May OPS is 740 and the 2023 OPS of 702 could be making Elias think I would like to get Gunnar hitting better before I promote another rookie that could also struggle. Or not. I will tell you what I think.  I think Elias addresses it on a  case by case basis.   Because Gunnar, Mateo, Frazier and Urias are already with the O's,  Elias does not have to take the risk on calling up rookies Westburg or Ortiz.   But with Mullins  out if Cowser was healthy he would promote him because Hicks, McKenna and Vavra performance is not likely be better than what Cowser would do.  Especially if McKenna still plays vs lefties.
    • Why do you think Westburg is still in AAA? One reason I've been entertaining the Super 2 possibility is that I find all the other explanations pretty flimsy as well at this point.  I don't believe it's about performance, Westburg's trade value, or anything related to prospect rankings. The expressed reason might be related to positional flexibility, but I don't fully buy that either. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...