Jump to content

ESPN inks 8 year $5.6 Billion deal with MLB


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Morning-Buzz/2012/08/28/ESPN-MLB.aspx

The eight-year deal is worth $5.6B (an average of $700M per year), approximately doubling the nearly $306M ESPN currently pays MLB every year for domestic TV rights. The new deal adds in digital, international and radio, for which ESPN is paying MLB around $50M currently, sources said.

Each teams share should go from around 10 million to over 20 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who watched ESPN baseball? I'm shocked that they think they can make money this way. I watch MASN and then I watch the MLB network. That's it.

Can they afford to not offer baseball? It still seems like an overpay, I can't imagine another player coming in and taking over that package of games at anywhere near that money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if it's less about the games and more about the ad revenue they get from it (since people won't skip commercials during live games.) Also worth it to keep Comcast/NBC Sports Network from getting it and helping to establish itself as a rival network to ESPN.

I really wish games would move away from ESPN and Fox though. It's like they're trying to do poor coverage on purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if it's less about the games and more about the ad revenue they get from it (since people won't skip commercials during live games.) Also worth it to keep Comcast/NBC Sports Network from getting it and helping to establish itself as a rival network to ESPN.

I really wish games would move away from ESPN and Fox though. It's like they're trying to do poor coverage on purpose.

I think it has more to do with maintaining leverage over cable providers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who watched ESPN baseball? I'm shocked that they think they can make money this way. I watch MASN and then I watch the MLB network. That's it.

I will watch it in the rare times that an Orioles game is covered. I really don't ever get to watch TV, but once in awhile I watch Baseball Tonight because I have never gotten MLB Network. I get most of my coverage online, which usually ends up being ESPN.com.

The coverage is awful though. MASN is actually really good for a regional production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can they afford to not offer baseball? It still seems like an overpay, I can't imagine another player coming in and taking over that package of games at anywhere near that money.

No Olympics, No Baseball, No Sports Network. They had plenty of unspent Olympic money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where does all of this money go? Hopefully an equal amount to each team?

ESPN also picked up rights to carry games featuring more popular teams, like the Yankees and Red Sox, more frequently.

Because they don't show enough of the Yankees and Red Sox..

This certainly explains a lot! The Yankees and Red Sox basically have a joint network now. Ensured of a solid fan base and more riches no matter how bad they get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if it's less about the games and more about the ad revenue they get from it (since people won't skip commercials during live games.) Also worth it to keep Comcast/NBC Sports Network from getting it and helping to establish itself as a rival network to ESPN.

I really wish games would move away from ESPN and Fox though. It's like they're trying to do poor coverage on purpose.

Agreed with this. I never watch ESPN unless it's college or NFL football...or MASN switches over to ESPNews. I can't really stand baseball on Fox because I don't like McCarver and everything is on too loud on their broadcasts. It's like they have 100,000 mics all over the field...it just all sounds pumped in from the studio to enhance the ambiance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...