Jump to content

Anyone worried about Machado's bat?


Mashed Potatoes

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
His plate discipline has been a concern so far...

Strictly speaking, his plate discipline isn't that bad. Middle of the road o-swing (30.3%) and z-swing (62.6%). Furthermore, his contact rates are pretty normal too in both cases (68% o-contact, 84.5% z-contact).

For comparison's sake, league average is 31.5% o-swing, 62.0% z-swing, 66.2% o-contact, 86.0% z-contact.

His discipline looks even better if you use the pitch f/x tracking instead of whatever else fangraphs uses.

The biggest thing is that pitchers are pitching him in the zone. His zone% is 48.4%, versus 44.1% in the rest of the league. As far as I can tell, Manny's not drawing walks because pitchers aren't throwing him balls. This appears to be a respect thing with opposing pitchers, not a plate discipline thing with Manny.

Obviously you're associating plate discipline with walk rate, which usually works out, but in this case there's a pretty big discrepancy between the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's doing just fine for only 19 (recently turned 20). 781 OPS, 286 BA, and a 484 SLG are nothing to sneeze at. The OBP is a bit alarming, but we're talking only 94 plate appearances, and pitchers are coming right at him being that he's young, lower in the order, doesn't have much protection, etc.

I think the walks will come with time. You're talking about a kid with really only 928 plate appearances in the minors. He did have a 263 BA and a 344 OBP for about an 80 point split. Pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy hyperbole, Batman! Machado has made 47 plays at 3B in the 17 games since he got here. That's about 8 plays in a 3-game series. He is probably making less than one play per series that Betemit wouldn't make. But that's plenty.

I disagree completely with what you are saying. Less than one play per series???? Are you kidding? He's making several plays a NIGHT that Betemit couldn't make.

You are nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree completely with what you are saying. Less than one play per series???? Are you kidding? He's making several plays a NIGHT that Betemit couldn't make.

You are nuts.

Since Betemit is making 2.31 successful plays per nine innings at third, and Machado is making 2.58, you're suggesting that the ball distribution is way off. In other words, when Machado is playing third dramatically fewer balls are hit his direction. Right? Otherwise your statement makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strictly speaking, his plate discipline isn't that bad. Middle of the road o-swing (30.3%) and z-swing (62.6%). Furthermore, his contact rates are pretty normal too in both cases (68% o-contact, 84.5% z-contact).

For comparison's sake, league average is 31.5% o-swing, 62.0% z-swing, 66.2% o-contact, 86.0% z-contact.

His discipline looks even better if you use the pitch f/x tracking instead of whatever else fangraphs uses.

The biggest thing is that pitchers are pitching him in the zone. His zone% is 48.4%, versus 44.1% in the rest of the league. As far as I can tell, Manny's not drawing walks because pitchers aren't throwing him balls. This appears to be a respect thing with opposing pitchers, not a plate discipline thing with Manny.

Obviously you're associating plate discipline with walk rate, which usually works out, but in this case there's a pretty big discrepancy between the two.

Good work. You're right I was just looking at walk rate and hadn't dove into it to that degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Betemit is making 2.31 successful plays per nine innings at third, and Machado is making 2.58, you're suggesting that the ball distribution is way off. In other words, when Machado is playing third dramatically fewer balls are hit his direction. Right? Otherwise your statement makes no sense.

Use your eyes........not garbage statistics that prove nothing. Or don't, I really don't care. But if you think there isn't a DRAMATIC difference between Betemit's defense and Machado's you are insane. That number doesn't even come close to showing what is really going on over there. Range, arm strength, ability to come in and make plays on the run, we've seen it over and over......

.27???? Wow......I'm sold.....that number certainly means alot.....to someone......somewhere.....who can't use his eyes or brain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use your eyes........not garbage statistics that prove nothing. Or don't' date=' I really don't care. But if you think there isn't a DRAMATIC difference between Betemit's defense and Machado's you are insane. That number doesn't even come close to showing what is really going on over there. Range, arm strength, ability to come in and make plays on the run, we've seen it over and over......

.27???? Wow......I'm sold.....that number certainly means alot.....to someone......somewhere.....who can't use his eyes or brain.[/quote']

So... what you're saying is that Machado makes a heck of a lot of plays when the guys writing down the plays are out getting a beer? Or that everyone is afraid to hit balls to Manny? I don't know what I'm missing here. Manny actually, really, in real life, is making about a quarter of a play a game that Betemit isn't. He's also making fewer errors. That's significant. He's making outs that Betemit isn't. But he simply isn't making 2 plays a game more than Betemit. That's loopy, that's crazy. You'd be suggesting that Manny was more than 300 plays better than Betemit over a full season. That's something like 130 runs, or thereabouts. Which means what you're claiming is impossible.

You're suggesting that the difference between Manny's glove and Betemit's is a lot greater than the difference between Albert Pujols' bat and Cesar Izturis' bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yes, obviously the two to 3 plays a game was over the top, but you honestly are making the statement that it's less than one play a game difference and I'm telling you that is simply just not the case.

He gets to ball's Wilson can't. He has a much stronger arm and is much more accurate. He makes teams think twice about bunting where Wilson actually encouraged teams to bunt for base hit's against us. His range is also significantly greater.

Whatever stat you are using to prove he is barely doing anything more than Wilson game in and game out, it's garbage. Complete and utter garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yes' date=' obviously the two to 3 plays a game was over the top, but you honestly are making the statement that it's less than one play a game difference and I'm telling you that is simply just not the case.

He gets to ball's Wilson can't. He has a much stronger arm and is much more accurate. He makes teams think twice about bunting where Wilson actually encouraged teams to bunt for base hit's against us. His range is also significantly greater.

Whatever stat you are using to prove he is barely doing anything more than Wilson game in and game out, it's garbage. Complete and utter garbage.[/quote']

Yea, the stat sucks. It's called "watching the game and counting how many balls they field".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, the stat sucks. It's called "watching the game and counting how many balls they field".

Do you think every stat that has ever been invented is worthwhile? Are you one of THOSE guys. Watch the game and watch the way they play defense. It might actually be Pujols to Izturis close.....that is how bad Betemit was in the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think every stat that has ever been invented is worthwhile? Are you one of THOSE guys. Watch the game and watch the way they play defense. It might actually be Pujols to Izturis close.....that is how bad Betemit was in the field.

I can't speak for Drungo but I think there are a lot of useless stats out there. Stuff like saves, RBI's, pitching wins.

I think actually counting the plays the fielders make is a pretty good stat.

BTW .27 with a lower error rate is significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His plate discipline has been a concern so far...
Strictly speaking, his plate discipline isn't that bad. Middle of the road o-swing (30.3%) and z-swing (62.6%). Furthermore, his contact rates are pretty normal too in both cases (68% o-contact, 84.5% z-contact).

For comparison's sake, league average is 31.5% o-swing, 62.0% z-swing, 66.2% o-contact, 86.0% z-contact.

His discipline looks even better if you use the pitch f/x tracking instead of whatever else fangraphs uses.

The biggest thing is that pitchers are pitching him in the zone. His zone% is 48.4%, versus 44.1% in the rest of the league. As far as I can tell, Manny's not drawing walks because pitchers aren't throwing him balls. This appears to be a respect thing with opposing pitchers, not a plate discipline thing with Manny.

Obviously you're associating plate discipline with walk rate, which usually works out, but in this case there's a pretty big discrepancy between the two.

Machado's minor league stats suggest he will draw his share of walks once he is fully adjusted to MLB. That may take another year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an undeniable statistical fact that Machado handles fewer than three chances a game. You simply can't make several more plays per game than another guy when your total chances are that low. Your position on this issue just makes no logical sense.

Do you think every stat that has ever been invented is worthwhile? Are you one of THOSE guys. Watch the game and watch the way they play defense. It might actually be Pujols to Izturis close.....that is how bad Betemit was in the field.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not entirely about what he is or isn't doing. It's about what he represents. Teams know they can no longer just bunt it down to third base for an automatic hit. They know that we have a real 3b who can gun out even the fastest of runners. It takes away an option for a hitter in the box who is trying to get on base.

Yes, he doesn't handle that many extra plays or make that many extra players per game, but that doesn't take into account the fact that teams are much less likely to bunt or even try to bunt for a hit against Machado than they were against Wilson.

That counts for something and it isn't measured in this statistic. Also the error rates are significant as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A couple of things that I find interesting, Yaqui Rivera - Acquired in the Tanner Scott/Cole Sulser trade with the Marlins. Juan Nunez - Acquired in the Jorge Lopez trade.   Creed Willems - still only 20 and already in A+.  He got off to a big start last year as well and then struggled the rest of the year.  We're a little spoiled with prospect success from the college guys and HS phenoms Mayo, Holliday, and Gunnar.  The HS position players take some time.  
    • Perez threw an inning of rehab last night with Norfolk.  His velocity was down about 1.5 MPH on his sinker, and everything was down a tick, but he was getting some work in and doesn't look too far away from being ready.
    • I don’t trust that guy to be very useful despite the strong start. He’s a good regression candidate. Would rather have Kopech. 
    • O's have Fabian behind Bradfield and Mullins will likely decline after '25 when he becomes a FA. I think one of those two should be able to hold down CF. Beavers could be in the mix as well.
    • Its a total joke that Wagner isn’t it in yet. 
    • I see no dilemma. He’s under team control right now during his best season’s. When he becomes a FA he will be out of his prime. I mean I love Mullins as a player and what he brings. But when we are talking about priorities for extensions, he is nowhere near the top considering you have an MVP caliber 22 year old, an ultra talented top prospect who is 20, and your team leader is 25. Those 3 are the engine that will drive this bus toward postseason glory most probably, not Cedric Mullins. If the Yanks want to give him that kind of contract while we retain 2 out of the 3 if Henderson, Rutschman, and Holliday; then so be it!  What I shudder to think about is a prime Henderson or Holliday crushing it for one of our competitors so that we can have a declining CF. Didn’t we just do that the last go around? Where we choose to resign the (predictably) declining player while we let the younger/more talented player leave? Yes, I agree that Bradfield Jr’s development is important. But since Elias/Sig have been here they haven’t struck out on any first round picks. Also, if Bradfield proves to be a bust, they can always draft and/or develop another CF type.
    • Thanks, I missed that detail probably multi-tasking in the game thread. I do think Kimbrel has a good shot*...Wagner should go in next cycle, and the electorate in the coming years will be wrestling with how Epstein, Friedman, etc. have improved per pitch efficiency by downsizing the workload literally any individual pitcher can shoulder.      There can't not be any Hall of Famers with all this run prevention going on.    I think now that he's officially retired Strasburg will be a good debate.    Bumgarner too, though I don't believe I've seen that guy yet admitting any retirement. *better shot if say he can get the last out of an important postseason series or three in 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...