Jump to content

Does anyone else hate Oakland?


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yea, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, I don't hate the team, but that stadium sucks.

Right now, it's more of a "hunt" mentality. I don't hate them, but this team is on a mission and they are standing in the way. If we have play with a bit of a chip on our shoulder to win, then that's what happens. Whatever it takes to move them out of the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I go to several A's games every year in Oakland, and I am always impressed by how well A's fans treat O's fans. It's like they're pulling for us to shut up the hateful Sux and Skanks.

Well, yeah. They've been destroyed in the playoffs by those teams, and they own us in Oak.

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stadium is definitely junk now, but it was pretty highly rated back in the 80's before all the new parks started getting built. They killed it for baseball by building Mt. Davis. Closing the bowl took away the bleachers, a nice view of the Oakland hills and made it feel dark and confined. The A's have a great chance to break out of being small market and move into a strong position if the league would go ahead and support a move to San Jose. The biggest reason why I hate the Giants is because they are doing whatever they can to prevent them from moving down here. The's A's gave them rights to Santa Clara Co. on good faith back in (I think it was) '92 when we had a chance to vote on building a stadium for the Giants. The measure failed but the Giants have still retained their claim all this time.

I've lived out here for my entire life and have had equal access to both OAK and SF. Being an O's fan since early on, we mostly went to AL games in OAK. The Colosseum was always way nicer than Candlestick anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have some experience with living in Oakland? Why do you say this?

Based on my view from the BART train while going to a game in July, the surrounding area *was* pretty dumpy looking. And that stadium, my God, that stadium. Ugh! Although, I will say that it was nice to be at a game where we weren't being slammed with music every 2 minutes and that stupid pre-recorded clapping used to amp up the crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am actually old enough I saw some of the rivalry with the A's in the 70's, and I didn't like them then, but that rivalry faded away. They have played us well, as has everyone the last decade or so, I just don't get too fired up either way. I sometimes appreciate the west coast trips more now that I live in Colorado, as they start at a time when I can catch most of the game.

Like a lot of O's fans, I have been keeping an eye on the A's the last 60-days in the wild card race, and they obviously aren't going anywhere soon. I know we want the big prize, I just want the little prize to get in the playoffs as a back-up plan and the A's are potentially in the way. These are big games.

So, I will certainly hate the A's for at least 72-hours....

-Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate when we play them away because frankly; I can't/won't stay up that damn late to watch the game!

West Coast games should start earlier so that they start earlier here. The NFL gets it with that!

The NFL is brutal out here. Try watching the Ravens at 10am. Beer and breakfast food don't mix very well, especially when you're already hungover. So I guess it evens out.

Anyway, I don't particularly hate the A's. That stadium does kinda seem like a crypt on TV, but it could be worse (TORONTO).

And as for the city of Oakland, it's actually very similar to Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A key variable is how (in)expensive each theoretical player and future years of control. i think the Os prefer to have mixture of player types, and hope that strategic deployment can have either A, B, or C in exceed their production norms. 
    • I'm going with two mids, a fat and a skinny. Anyone gets that reference, I'll buy you a beer if I ever see you at Camden Yards.
    • Wait, how do you assess if a player is ready or not if not for how they perform at the major league level? How do you assess that a player was not rushed when he's putting up historically bad numbers to start off a career? Now I agree with you that Elias has a better feel for when he should go back down or not, but I don't think Holliday has proven anybody wrong who thinks he was rushed. His performance so far if anything has proven them right.  Can he right the ship and prove them wrong, sure, but so far, anyone who says he was absolutely ready have been proven wrong. He's not been just unlucky, he's been terrible at every measurable attribute we have for hitting.  There is also a misnomer that players can not learn anything else at a previous level. That's just wrong. Having statcast data now shows there is major league caliber stuff in AAA, it's just often not consistent.  Plus, the ability to just relax a little work on the things the major league coaches have him working on in a less stressful environment can also be a plus. He has 147 AA PAs under his belt that he put up a respectable .899 OPS, but he's also a kid who had a 105 PA stretch last year in High-A ball where he put up a .183/.362/.232/.594 slash line where he had two extra base hits and basically only got on base by walking against bad command High-A ball pitchers.  Holliday has a tremendous amount of talent, and he's going to be fine in the long run, but I disagree that sending him back to AAA will do him no good. Will having him set more futility records to start a major league career be helpful? If we get swept in a series and he goes 0-for does that mean he's now hurting the team? I'm ok with leaving it up to Elias/Hyde to make that decision, but I would have zero issues if they sent him back to reset for bit. 
    • Suppose you have three players in an organization who play the same position.  Player A is +10 runs on offense but -10 runs on defense.  Player B is -10 runs on offense but +10 runs on defense.  Player C is average on both offense and defense.   Which player would you choose to be on your team? And is your answer different depending on which position we’re talking about? Apart from your preference, do you think the Orioles have a preference? For purposes of my questions, no copping out by saying it depends who else is on the team.  
    • And if age was the ONLY data point we used for projection, you MIGHT then have a point.  But its not, and you don't.
    • If Kjerstadt hits well I see no reason to send him back down, he could DH if necessary, good teams find a place for a good hitter.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...