Jump to content

Does anyone else hate Oakland?


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The NFL is brutal out here. Try watching the Ravens at 10am. Beer and breakfast food don't mix very well, especially when you're already hungover. So I guess it evens out.

Anyway, I don't particularly hate the A's. That stadium does kinda seem like a crypt on TV, but it could be worse (TORONTO).

And as for the city of Oakland, it's actually very similar to Baltimore.

I guess it depends on your lifestyle. The times I have been out to MT for elk hunts, it was really nice to go for a morning hunt and come back for the 11:00 game (I realize the is MST time not PST) and then have enough time to get back out for the afternoon hunt! Of course that probably doesn't apply as much to most of CA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate them now. But seriously, I lived in the East Bay during the late eighties and early nineties and became a fan of the Bash Brothers (Oh how naive and innocent I was then !). I would go to all the games in that dreadul stadium whenever the O's were in town. I think the O's and A's...as well as their respective cities....share a few things in common, such as living in the shadow of a flashier, sexier, and richer neighbor. I sort of thought of them as kindred souls to my beloved O's and it was the start of my long standing hatred of the Giants!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate them now. But seriously, I lived in the East Bay during the late eighties and early nineties and became a fan of the Bash Brothers (Oh how naive and innocent I was then !). I would go to all the games in that dreadul stadium whenever the O's were in town. I think the O's and A's...as well as their respective cities....share a few things in common, such as living in the shadow of a flashier, sexier, and richer neighbor. I sort of thought of them as kindred souls to my beloved O's and it was the start of my long standing hatred of the Giants!

At least at that time there wasn't a Mount Davis in centerfield. I went to a lot of games during that same period and always thought it was a pretty cool stadium, if not exactly top-tier. The bleachers were great... And it was definitely superior to Candlestick, which didn't have easy access, was in one of the worst (crime-ridden) sections of SF, and was perpetually cold and windy and had some of the worst sight lines of any ballpark I'd ever been to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least at that time there wasn't a Mount Davis in centerfield. I went to a lot of games during that same period and always thought it was a pretty cool stadium, if not exactly top-tier. The bleachers were great... And it was definitely superior to Candlestick, which didn't have easy access, was in one of the worst (crime-ridden) sections of SF, and was perpetually cold and windy and had some of the worst sight lines of any ballpark I'd ever been to.

Yeah I suppose the place does have some subtle charms. The BART access is a plus, and the Oakland fans are a down to earth, fun loving and knowledgeable bunch…at least they were back then. Plus how can you not love Banjo Man:

[video=youtube_share;bdC4ig-XwQ8]http://youtu.be/bdC4ig-XwQ8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I suppose the place does have some subtle charms. The BART access is a plus, and the Oakland fans are a down to earth, fun loving and knowledgeable bunch…at least they were back then. Plus how can you not love Banjo Man:

[video=youtube_share;bdC4ig-XwQ8]http://youtu.be/bdC4ig-XwQ8

Ha. I'd forgotten about banjo man - thanks for sharing. And you're right about the fans, who are often just as interested in seeing the best players on the opposition as in their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...