Jump to content

Who is Mr. Oriole to you?


Tony-OH

Who is Mr. Oriole?  

150 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is Mr. Oriole?


This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Our demographics around her probably leans us heavily towards people who never saw Brooks Robinson play live. However, with all the things going on with Cal going out of his way to dismiss Brook Robinson as the best defensive third baseman of all time and how he seems to be also going out of his way to "not look like a homer" by slanting his comments towards the Yankees, who do you think is now Mr. Oriole?

I would imagine Cal would be a heavy favorite around here in the past, so now I'm wondering whether Cal's comments over the last few days has affected his standing among Orioles fans.

So if you could choose one ambassador for the Baltimore Orioles, who would it be? Who is Mr. Oriole to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooks, no question. It's probably a function of when I grew up, and the opinions passed to me by my parents. I was told in no uncertain terms that Brooksie was the best 3rd baseman to ever play the game. Period. It was later in life that I learned more about Brooks the man, and I cemented my opinion that he was not only the best 3rd baseman, but also probably the best man to ever wear an Orioles uniform. Nothing, Including the ill timed comments of another of my heroes can change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I literally couldn't listen to the game last night. I watched with the sound off. Thank goodness I have tickets to tonight's game. I don't know what is behind this crap, whether it's bitterness towards Angelos or what. Since neither Brooks nor Cal has really been around the franchise that much over the last 10 years, I'd go with Palmer.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooks, no question. It's probably a function of when I grew up, and the opinions passed to me by my parents. I was told in no uncertain terms that Brooksie was the best 3rd baseman to ever play the game. Period. It was later in life that I learned more about Brooks the man, and I cemented my opinion that he was not only the best 3rd baseman, but also probably the best man to ever wear an Orioles uniform. Nothing, Including the ill timed comments of another of my heroes can change that.

Brooks came down from a high league of human beings. To teach us how we all should be. They always said, "He doesn't know he is Brooks Robinson."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

brooks, no question. It's probably a function of when i grew up, and the opinions passed to me by my parents. I was told in no uncertain terms that brooksie was the best 3rd baseman to ever play the game. Period. It was later in life that i learned more about brooks the man, and i cemented my opinion that he was not only the best 3rd baseman, but also probably the best man to ever wear an orioles uniform. Nothing, including the ill timed comments of another of my heroes can change that.

word..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooks came down from a high league of human beings. To teach us how we all should be. They always said, "He doesn't know he is Brooks Robinson."

That and what MTOsFan said. My feelings have nothing to do with how Cal has handled his TV gig. A Sun article about Brooks night used an email I'd sent to the reporter that said "...because he [brooks] was the first great Oriole and affection is the core feeling he inspires in us. Jim, Earl, Eddie, and Frank we admire and respect immensely, but there is a certain aloofness that sets them apart from us. Cal we worship because of the other-worldliness of The Streak. Brooks has always been closer to us and our hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • weams locked this topic
  • weams unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It was huge. I wasn't old enough to read it until about the 1980 version, but I'd check it out from the library every few weeks and probably read it cover to cover multiple times. It was there that I found things like Willie Keeler's .432 average in 1897, for the National League Baltimore Orioles, of all things. I think many people don't realize that before the McMillan Encyclopedia there was no single comprehensive source for this information. In many cases no source at all. You mention the Whos Whos in Baseball publications, but they only had active players. And I'm not sure how accurate they were, or how comprehensive. If you wanted to see who won the American League in 1907... I don't know. Or who won the 1922 batting title if you didn't have a stack of old Sporting News or Spalding Guides. There were some earlier books, like one called Daguerreotypes, but they were not well known or widely available or probably very accurate. I think it's true that when Ty Cobb retired he probably didn't know how many hits he actually had. When Babe Ruth started hitting homers some writer had to go dig around old guides and total stuff up to see if he was getting near some career record. The Encyclopedia was the beginning of the end of people who'd tell these long-winded stories of great feats of baseball from decades ago that were mostly not true. End of the Cliff Clavin era.
    • I’d say Tampa.    I don’t want to see Arozarena in a playoff series. Ever. He kills us and I’m sure he’d go off on a big stage.  Their pitching is really good.     
    • There's a new test called the S2 cognition test that is supposedly a better predictor of QB success rates than Wonderlic, which has a lot of high profile misses, Lamar included.  (Dan Marino, Jim Kelly, Steve McNair among others.)  With the number of misses on the Wonderlic test  it's hard for me to take the test seriously as a predictor of NFL quarterbacking success.  I also found this study that says the same thing:   https://harvardsportsanalysis.org/2014/04/wondering-about-the-wonderlic-does-it-predict-quarterback-performance/#:~:text=From the various tests we,and Wonderlic scores of quarterbacks.   S2 picked up on Brock Purdy being a possible diamond in the rough.  It started being taken around 2015, so its likely Lamar took it, but his score hasn't been publicized.  People made a big deal about it this past draft cycle because CJ Stroud did terribly on it apparenty.
    • The way I read this, anyone on the 40 man is eligible, even if they are in the minors. Then there are exceptions for players who aren't on the 40an. So yes, I am not expert in roster rules but I believe Grayson, Kjerstad etc could be optioned and still make the postseason roster as long as they stay on the 40 man roster.
    • If we’re just talking internal candidates then I think it’s pretty easy to put something accurate together. Personally, I don’t believe for a second that Holliday has a real chance at breaking OD. I think Urias at 3B, Henderson at SS, and Westburg at 2B is the most likely every day configuration if they’re not adding anyone significant from outside the organization.   If we start talking about potential moves for outside players then this gets a lot more dicey, but fun. Personally, I’d like to see two mid-rotation starters added. Give me something like Jordan Montgomery and Logan Gilbert. Tell me that a rotation of Rodriguez, Bradish, Montgomery, Gilbert, and Means is not one of the most balanced rotations in baseball. Insert similar names for the additions, I’m not particularly hung up on specifics right now. That’d push Wells and Kremer to the BP full time.  Id probably resign both Fuji and Hicks, if he’s interested. That leaves a bullpen with something like Cano, Fuji, Webb, Coulombe, Hall, Wells, Kremer, and Perez. I gotta agree about Bautista, unfortunately.    Big if, but if we are thinking that Holliday is a legit consideration then I’d be moving Urias. Mateo seems like a easy DFA. Ortiz can be the backup infielder. I may even consider moving Urias anyways and slotting Ortiz at SS until Holliday is ready.    Anyways, that’s really just an addition of a couple mid rotation starters (one through FA, one through trade), an okay bullpen addition, and possibly a veteran presence if Hicks is okay with a backup role in the OF. I don’t really feel the veteran presence is totally necessary, but judging by offseasons of the past, Elias finds it very necessary no matter how redundant the piece may be.    Also, there’s no room for all of Hays, Mullins, Santander, Cowser, Kjerstad, and Stowers. I’m thinking at least one of these OF guys can be part of the aforementioned trade for a mid rotation starter. Does something like Kjerstad, Basallo, and Urias get Gilbert? I dunno…getting too specific now. 
    • Adley’s going to reach base 250+ times this season.  Joe Mauer did that 4 times.  Mike Piazza did it twice. Johnny Bench once. Buster Posey never did.  Neither did Carlton Fisk, Gary Carter, Yadier Molina,  Jorge Posada or Ivan Rodriguez.  
    • That would certainly explain why O’Hearn is not allowed to hit against a LHP ever. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...