Jump to content

Cubs showing interest in Bedard


theobird

Recommended Posts

Bedard and Robert for Pie, Hill, Murton, Cedeno, and Gallagher would be interesting but I am not sure the Cubs would want to give up Hill. I would want Pie and Hill in any trade where we give up Bedard and Roberts. If they will not give up both Hill and Gallagher I would think about replacing Gallagher with Vitters.

Vitters can't be dealt yet.

Murton is redundant with Scott here.

Cedeno is garbage IMO.

Can't imagine they include Hill in a trade for Bedard...Makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Bedard and Robert for Pie, Hill, Murton, Cedeno, and Gallagher would be interesting but I am not sure the Cubs would want to give up Hill. I would want Pie and Hill in any trade where we give up Bedard and Roberts. If they will not give up both Hill and Gallagher I would think about replacing Gallagher with Vitters.

They can't trade Vitters until midseason.

Can they name him as a PTBNL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps the Cubs will forget about Roberts since 2B is not that big a need and go after only Bedard with Pie, Gallagher, Veal and maybe 1 more prospect. Not sure if that is enough but compares to the other packages we have seen offered thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps the Cubs will forget about Roberts since 2B is not that big a need and go after only Bedard with Pie, Gallagher, Veal and maybe 1 more prospect. Not sure if that is enough but compares to the other packages we have seen offered thus far.

Way too many questions marks in that package, IMO.

If we're trading Bedard solo, I prefer to trade him to Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully MacPhail won't get woodie about acquiring guys he had in Chitown and make a dumb trade of Bedard.

Now MacPhail is getting Wood?

For who?

Hu.

That's what I'm asking, MacPhail is getting Wood for who?

Yes, Hu.

That's what I wanna know.

I could go on and on and on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vitters can't be dealt yet.

Murton is redundant with Scott here.

Cedeno is garbage IMO.

Can't imagine they include Hill in a trade for Bedard...Makes no sense.

They'd have to include Hill. Maybe they think Bedard is a significant upgrade over him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much new or startling here. Basically he is saying "it's feasible that they're talking" without much evidence beyond the relationship between Hendry and MacPhail. I don't see anything that looks like an actual leak of information. It's more a deduction than anything else.

I think most of us here, already aware of that relationship, have figured that it's a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No real news there. The Cubs are "interested" in Bedard because they are interested in driving the price up for Cincy. I'm sure that if MacPhail thought the Cubs had enough for Erik, it would be done by now. He and Hendry seem to talk quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...