Jump to content

One change you'd make to...***gasp***... the great Camden Yards.


Todd-O

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If the Orioles put a Chipotle in I would attend every single home game.

Then they would also be able to sell Chipotle-away.

Seriously though, tex-mex would be great.

My biggest improvement would be to get a Spanish radio announcer and put them in the empty broadcasting booth next to Fred and Joe. The Orioles are missing out on an ever growing segment of the city's population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then they would also be able to sell Chipotle-away.

Seriously though, tex-mex would be great.

My biggest improvement would be to get a Spanish radio announcer and put them in the empty broadcasting booth next to Fred and Joe. The Orioles are missing out on an ever growing segment of the city's population.

This made me think a bit. At one point, the Orioles actually had one of the most number of Hispanic players on any one team. It was a while ago when I think they had the likes of Tejada, Mora, Gil, and Rodrigo Lopez. This isn't the case anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This made me think a bit. At one point, the Orioles actually had one of the most number of Hispanic players on any one team. It was a while ago when I think they had the likes of Tejada, Mora, Gil, and Rodrigo Lopez. This isn't the case anymore.

Strop and Betemit are from the Domincan Republic.

Ayala is from Mexico.

Machado, Dino and Gonzo are from the USA, but they have hispanic roots.

I assume Chavez, Paulino, Socolovich, and Quintanilla are also hispanic but they aren't with the team anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed on the Spanish broadcast. Latinos are becoming more and more prevalent in Baltimore. Hearst, unfortunately, only has two stations in the Baltimore market, so I'm not sure how they would get the games out there on the radio. My guess is that the Orioles would sell Spanish flagship rights to one of the other radio conglomerates with Hearst getting some kind of residual.

Sent from my C5155 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...in order to get kids interested in the game, they should be distracted with the wave? Man...the wave is just all kinds of terrible, especially at a baseball game.

I don't think you understand the value of having your kids enjoy the game. At certain ages, it is impossible for them to enjoy the game just for the sport itself.

That said, I hate the wave. They tried to do it on the welcome home rally. Come on man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wave sucks but I loved it until I got older and started appreciating the game more. You have to understand a huge number of people at Camden Yards are there more for the atmosphere, entertainment and the opportunity to socialize than to intently watch baseball. The wave, the in between inning features and concessions are basically directed at these people. Obviously there is a ton of overlap between fans and people who want to be entertained (ie casual fans) but not everybody is satisfied solely by watching baseball.

As the team gets better and more fun to watch, more people will be interested in the game itself and the stadium experience will reflect that. You could already sense it happening a little bit this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, while we discuss potential improvements of the park, I was VERY happy with all of the changes that Janet Marie Smith and co. introduced this season. The Batter's Eye bar is phenomenal, the many murals, paintings, homages to Orioles teams of the past...terrific.

I also really liked the bar table style seating in the club level that Miller Lite rents out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The second question is - what extensions can the Orioles do with guys other than these 4, who are not Boras clients? Don’t want to rehash the “Boras clients don’t extend” debate, but let’s assume whatever they can do with these 4 doesn’t impact the ability to do other extensions.  Grayson: With 5 years of control after this one, it would have to be something like 6 years + a couple option years. Possible, but not super high priority.  Bradish: Entirely TBD on how he returns from injury, and even then a bit of the same question as Grayson with so much control remaining.  Westburg, Cowser and Kjerstad: Lumping them all together because I think it’s similar considerations. At their ages when their years of control expire, I don’t think it really makes sense. All 3 have been phenomenal to start the year but still have significant question marks about their games (really high whiff rates and not great K/BB for Westburg and Cowser, Kjerstad’s defense, chase rate and of course not yet facing MLB yet). Mayo and Basallo: Given their ages they are going to be the best candidates, IMO. However, it’s premature now for obvious reasons, particularly with the major questions about how much defensive value they are going to provide at the MLB level.  Unfortunately I have a hard time seeing any extensions happening in the near future, even if Elias and Rubenstein have all the best intentions of wanting to do them. 
    • My opinion in principle depends on the duration of the FA contract.  For the Orioles as currently constructed, the roster will be inexpensive over next 3 years with most premium guys either pre-arb or early arb years.  That would make me lean toward FA signing of elite SP this upcoming offseason. Now last winter we saw only Nola receive long duration contract at 7yrs (I’m putting Yamamoto & Ohtani in separate category given the JP marketing angle).  The industry seemed reticent to give $$$ and length to the other premium SPs (Snell, Montgomery) but was this Boras driven?  Would the premium SPs be willing to sign 3-4 yr deals at higher AAVs or instead play out essentially one year deals?  Example — would a guy like Burnes go for 4/175M? the market dynamics will be interesting with demand (which big market clubs pursuing — Cubs, LAA, SFG, NYY?) and supply (Burnes, Fried as FAs and Montgomery, Snell, Cole as potential opt outs).  As well as Boras negotiating factor.   
    • Adley by default (though not sure if he’d prefer to be west coast long term). I don’t expect Gunnar, Corbin, or Jackson to be viable extension options.  I know there are some examples of Boras clients extending like Strasbourg and Carlos Gomez, but it’s rare and I can’t see Elias pulling the trigger on what it would take to get one of those deals done.  
    • The playoffs is extremely volatile. This isn't the NBA or even the NFL; the best team doesn't win all the time, or perhaps even most of the time. So long as they are annually good enough to win the AL East, there really can be no rational critique of their approach.
    • You predicting any rings? At this point that should be the goal.
    • Here's my prediction: We're going to win ~ games this season and ~100 games next season. And in between, in the next off-season, this board will have several meltdowns bemoaning the lack of FA signings.
    • This is why I was against the Burnes trade. I could turn out to be wrong even only having him for one year, but I would have rather got a guy with a few years of control. I agree though. You really can't extend him at what he's going to ask for.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...