Jump to content

Don't put too much stock in the results of a short series


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Personally, I would not read much into the Tigers' 4 game sweep of the Yankees, for either team. The Yankees won 7 more games than the Tigers during the regular season, playing in a tougher division. They played the Tigers 10 times in the regular season and beat them in 6. And it's not like the Tigers dominated the A's in the ALDS. They got an extra day of rest because of the way the playoffs were scheduled, and ran into the Yankees at a time when more than half their team was slumping. The Yankees lost Jeter in Game 1 and frankly, I think that totally deflated them. The Orioles took them to the final day of the regular season and I think they were just emotionally spent.

The pundits will have a field day drawing grand conclusions about how great the Tigers are and how the Yankees are on their last legs. But to me, it's mostly a matter of being in the right place at the right time for the Tigers. They finished their season with 13 games against the Twins and Royals and watched the White Sox go 4-9 in that final 13 games to hand them the division title, or they would not even have been a playoff team. Then, because of the fact that they knew they would be the no. 3 seed in Round 1 several days in advance, they were able to coast in, line up Verlander on a full week of rest in Game 1 of the ALDS (playing at home even though Oakland had the better record by far), and put Oakland in the position of needing a sweep on its home field to beat them, with a fully rested Verlander pitching Game 5. And, as I already said, they got an extra day before the ALCS started, too.

Don't get me wrong, the Tigers played great in this series, but I wouldn't draw any grand conclusions about them or the Yankees for next year based on this series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joel Sherman thinks we should.

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/yankees/dreadful_playoffs_lead_to_many_offseason_6Ib2OWjZcXdmDvMED9RqFO

There is only wreckage now, the detritus of having every weakness exposed, of falling apart so completely as to make it difficult to see the outline of a major league team, much less the New York Yankees.

Over the coming days and weeks, Yankees management must assess the meaning of that wreckage, of a humiliating ALCS sweep by the Tigers.

Normally, Brian Cashman’s front office would favor the big picture: That over six months – with all their offensive issues – the Yankees did finish with the second-most runs in the majors, the best record in the AL and a Division Series victory. Cashman has always valued assembling a roster to attain the posteason and then hope his club was healthy and playing well enough to do something come October.

But it would be a mistake to dismiss these playoffs, specifically the past four games, as small-sample irrelevance. It was instead a microcosm of their problems made clearer under the microscope of the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they really want to, sure. But they've been pretty adamant about keeping their young pitching prospects *this time*.

I thought they all had Tommy John Surgery or SLAP tear surgery. Do they have any young pitching that would be trade-able?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Palmer can gush all he wants.  I haven’t heard him say much about Jorge’s at bats.   If you have a great team and a great one-way player, that’s great.  Would you rather have the best defensive catcher in baseball or Adley Rutshman at catcher?    
    • Thanks--Was wondering if that was the reason.
    • At only a hair above $20 million per year, it feels like a pretty significant bargain compared to what mid-rotation guys like Jon Gray and E-Rod got in free agency last offseason, but love the trend of reasonable pre-FA extensions and hope the Elias can also get in on the action in the coming years. Hitting on a couple of those can really help lay the foundation for a sustained run, i.e. Adam Jones' and JJ Hardy's (the first one at least) extensions during the DD era.
    • Its a really interesting choice, including factoring in Holliday for the longer term.    Simplest terms Urias is floor, Mateo is ceiling.    You smother Westburg and Ortiz both if you want to hoard.    How solidly does Elias believe in the rest of the 2023 team? I would guess NO on Mateo, Urias, Westburg, Ortiz and Norby all being in the organization come Spring Training, and offseason actions will give us some of Elias' answers. I do think Westburg and Ortiz are the level of players Elias will manage to keep control of 2029 and "more years of control" as future trade chips, a fate Grayson might share if the calculation ends up he won't get the volume of innings needed to make a Top 2 2023 Rookie of the Year finish likely. Whoever gets the May-June-July starting job may also be the one being showcased as the Joe Musgrove type guy come Trade Deadline time.
    • Could be .. but I have never heard Jim Palmer gush about any shortstop.. not even Belanger.. as he does about Mateo.   It is a good problem to have but the correct bat comparison is actually between Mateo and Urias .   Urias will be traded or become the Melvin Mora utility guy in my scenario, not Henderson.  So Urias .697 OPS and Mateo’s .647 is the difference between our proposals,  50 OPS not 200,  because Henderson’s bat is in my lineup too..and Mateo’s elite speed is also a plus.    We shall see.. but i think Mateo can still improve further at the plate from his first full every day season. 
    • For years, Brooks had a "strained relationship" with the Orioles thanks to Peter Angelos.  Thankfully, John Angelos has since tried to make amends.  "Cynical?" Brooks is 85, honor him while you still can.      
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...