Jump to content

Trade Jim Johnson!


avdeuph

Recommended Posts

I would think DD has sent out feelers on what teams might be willing to give for JJ. I think with O'Day and Strop at the backend of the bullpen, we would be fine if the haul for JJ was really good. I don't see us paying him top closer money next offseason, so I'd rather get a couple good prospects for him than hope for some supplemental first round pick after he leaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I would think DD has sent out feelers on what teams might be willing to give for JJ. I think with O'Day and Strop at the backend of the bullpen, we would be fine if the haul for JJ was really good. I don't see us paying him top closer money next offseason, so I'd rather get a couple good prospects for him than hope for some supplemental first round pick after he leaves.

The O's will be going for the World Series in 2013. I can't see them trading Johnson or O'Day or Strop for prospects. Ayala or Patton or Hunter or Matusz for a MOO hitter maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's will be going for the World Series in 2013. I can't see them trading Johnson or O'Day or Strop for prospects. Ayala or Patton or Hunter or Matusz for a MOO hitter maybe.

All teams are going for the World Series next year. The Orioles appear to be working with a budget, so getting a bat may be dependant on moving some salary away. JJ is probably the only salary "relief" player that has any trade value, outside of Jones, and I doubt they would want to trade AJ.

Relief pithers vary so much from year to year. JJ could be a 5 or so million dollar bust in 2013, and it would not be a shock to anyone. They have some capable guys to close out games next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All teams are going for the World Series next year. The Orioles appear to be working with a budget, so getting a bat may be dependant on moving some salary away. JJ is probably the only salary "relief" player that has any trade value, outside of Jones, and I doubt they would want to trade AJ.

Relief pithers vary so much from year to year. JJ could be a 5 or so million dollar bust in 2013, and it would not be a shock to anyone. They have some capable guys to close out games next year.

JMO but I consider JJ solid. I think he stays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would take A LOT for me to begin to considering a JJ trade. 99% of me is against any notion of trading him. I thought he was amazing last year --- wish he hadn't coughed up that save in the Bronx --- but we wouldn't have gotten to the playoffs without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but Porcello led the league in hits allowed last year in only 176 innings. His WHIP has gotten worse every year for the last four. The last three years his ERA is over 5.00. I would not give up Strop of this guy. He is a project.

Last year, in his age 23 season, Porcello put up a 4.59 ERA with a 3.90 FIP/xFIP (Fielding Independent)... Detroit's infield defense is bad. Our's is very good. The reason his WHIP and hits allowed have gone up are because of that bad defense behind him. He has a 1.13 GB/FB ratio. Last year his K/9, SwSt%, St% and FB velocity were up from 2011. He'll be 24 for us next season. These are all reasons which indicate he'd be a #4, at a minimum, for us next year. I haven't really seen any good reasons to suggest he's merely a "project".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year, in his age 23 season, Porcello put up a 4.59 ERA with a 3.90 FIP/xFIP (Fielding Independent)... Detroit's infield defense is bad. Our's is very good. The reason his WHIP and hits allowed have gone up are because of that bad defense behind him. He has a 1.13 GB/FB ratio. Last year his K/9, SwSt%, St% and FB velocity were up from 2011. He'll be 24 for us next season. These are all reasons which indicate he'd be a #4, at a minimum, for us next year. I haven't really seen any good reasons to suggest he's merely a "project".

Its a big gamble. He has gotten worse every year. I would not trade Strop for him. The Tigers have the offense to cover for him with his high ERA hits and WHIP. The O's don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen too many people address what I consider to be the main point of my post...that JJ is one of the strongest sell-high candidates that we have. I didn't throw his name out randomly.

That is opposed to Strop, who I consider sell-medium or so, and Tillman, whose stock I think is considerably lower. I am strongly opposed to trading Tillman when other teams don't see the potential that we saw this past half-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year, in his age 23 season, Porcello put up a 4.59 ERA with a 3.90 FIP/xFIP (Fielding Independent)... Detroit's infield defense is bad. Our's is very good. The reason his WHIP and hits allowed have gone up are because of that bad defense behind him. He has a 1.13 GB/FB ratio. Last year his K/9, SwSt%, St% and FB velocity were up from 2011. He'll be 24 for us next season. These are all reasons which indicate he'd be a #4, at a minimum, for us next year. I haven't really seen any good reasons to suggest he's merely a "project".

Ah, but, you see, Rick Porcello is not a "Baltimore Oriole". If he were, he would of course be full of potential with an impeccable draft pedigree, and off the table unless you're getting an impact bat in return. But since Rick Porcello is a "Detroit Tiger", he's a project who's not worth our third-best reliever, acquired as a PTBNL, who is probably the single most likely candidate for negative regression on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but Porcello led the league in hits allowed last year in only 176 innings. His WHIP has gotten worse every year for the last four. The last three years his ERA is over 5.00. I would not give up Strop of this guy. He is a project.

Throwing 176 innings is a lot. He was also tied for 15th with fewest walks allowed last year with C.C.. (or pitchers throwing at least 140 IP). So that's part of it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...