Jump to content

Withholding Judgment


Spy Fox

Recommended Posts

Reynolds' defense simply wasn't as good as people made it out to be. He had very little range, and he made other plays look more difficult than they really were, which is why to the naked eye they appeared to be much more impressive.

I agree he was somewhat overrated around here, but he was still much better than Davis was last year. The onus is on Davis to show he can step up his defensive game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nolan Reimold will blow Reynold's bat out of the water this year, IMO.

First, he has to be healthy enough to play most or all of the year. Second, he has to be able to hit well despite missing nearly a full year and despite any lingering issues from his injury. Neither is a sure thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree he was somewhat overrated around here, but he was still much better than Davis was last year. The onus is on Davis to show he can step up hid defensive game.

That's such a small sample size to look at, in my opinion. To base it off only 343 innings there last year is not something I'm comfortable with, especially if the organization feels he can handle it. I know there is a lot of debate about defensive metrics and their value, but if you look at Defensive runs saved, I think Reynolds was about -9 runs saved over his time at 1B last year. Davis was +4 in his 343 innings there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, he has to be healthy enough to play most or all of the year. Second, he has to be able to hit well despite missing nearly a full year and despite any lingering issues from his injury. Neither is a sure thing.

Reimold is another of the Orioles who could be a big part of a successful year but about whom there is also a lot of uncertainty. The encouraging thing for me is the DD doesn't seem to be counting on any or all of the question marks to have to turn into sure things but is stockpiling options and continually looking for other candidates. I certainly HOPE that Reimold is healthy all year and lives up to the potential we have seen but I have been waiting for this since 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, he has to be healthy enough to play most or all of the year. Second, he has to be able to hit well despite missing nearly a full year and despite any lingering issues from his injury. Neither is a sure thing.

Agreed, but Reimold has averaged close to 130 games the prior 3/4 seasons (one of which included the achilles problem). I expect 100 games, if he's already in full workouts now, at a minimum. And that will be enough, hopefully.

Agree with Fears noodles on Mark's defense. He made some flashy plays, but his approach at 1B was limited in range. He appears to keep his center of gravity close to the ground and would dive on plays that a more experienced/defensive 1B would scoop up with one step.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reynolds' defense simply wasn't as good as people made it out to be. He had very little range, and he made other plays look more difficult than they really were, which is why to the naked eye they appeared to be much more impressive.

He was good, yes. But I don't think he was as great as he looked. And I also don't think Davis will consistently drop chest high throws. I think their defense is a wash.

And with Reimold added I think the whole team is improved. Not the sense of what we were talking about earlier but I get mixed up. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reynolds' defense simply wasn't as good as people made it out to be. He had very little range, and he made other plays look more difficult than they really were, which is why to the naked eye they appeared to be much more impressive.

You can't just look at a stat sheet and sum up Reynolds play at 1B. The way he played in June is not how he was playing in August, Sept and October. He was learning on the job. His range toward the end of the season was very good. In fact he had to learn how to not range too far in some cases.

That he made some plays look harder than they were is probably true, but the bottom line is that he made the plays. He caught the bounced throws and the throws that were off the bag. He showed very well defensively by the end of the season. No need the bad month the guy now that he will not be back with the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's such a small sample size to look at, in my opinion. To base it off only 343 innings there last year is not something I'm comfortable with, especially if the organization feels he can handle it. I know there is a lot of debate about defensive metrics and their value, but if you look at Defensive runs saved, I think Reynolds was about -9 runs saved over his time at 1B last year. Davis was +4 in his 343 innings there.

DRS shows Davis a minus 4 (-14 per year rate of efficiency) and Reynolds a minus 2 (minus 3 per year rate of efficiency) at first base last year. Reynolds was a plus 4 in GFP's (Good Fielding Plays - not range related) while Davis was a minus 4 in GFP's. UZR (primarily uses range) shows Davis more favorably, but UZR is also a lot more generic than DRS. I'm also of the opinion that Reynolds play improved at first base last year over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Reynolds appears to be the better defensive 1B, so it's a downgrade to the defense. Therefore, it can only be an upgrade if Reynolds' at bats are going to go to someone who is a better hitter than he is, and the difference needs to be more than marginal in light of the fact that the defense is taking something of a hit. And, there is a depth issue, too.

Shouldn't Manny be put into this equation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shouldn't Manny be put into this equation?

Manny's throws aren't perfect either. He makes so many crazy plays he doesn't always have time to set and throw. Mark finished a lot of amazing plays by Manny. Chris will have to try to do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think you're basically right, probability-wise.  That said, almost no one thought Kjerstad coming up today was the move they were going to make. So... you never really know with Mike and roster moves. But I agree, it's tough to figure out how he stays if Mounty is healthy when Hays comes back. 
    • But he's 82nd percentile in barrel percentage and 92nd percentile in Whiff. I saw some some high EVs that were hit at 60 degree angles or more which were pop ups. I'm not saying he's a long term piece. I'd need to see it for longer than two starts, but I like the stuff overall, especially if he can get his curveball over more often to give another look to the change and cutter.
    • The rookie is a #2 overall selection, now 25 years old, who battled back from missing significant time with non-baseball related illness, was called up last season but had mostly sit behind a mediocre performing veteran (Hays), and is performing better at the minor league levels than Hays ever did. But, I guess he hasn’t paid his dues and is just temporarily holding a spot for the guy who was fortunate enough to come up when he was much younger and the organization was in bad shape.
    • Simmer down...  Just because you've got it all figured out doesn't mean I do.
    • by all means bet the house and the student loans
    • Jumping on to make sure everyone here knows about the Orioles history project I've started this season. It's called the Bird Tapes . When I wrote my oral history book about the team a quarter-century ago, I interviewed all the major figures in franchise history and kept the microcassette tapes that I used while recording those interviews. They sat in a shoebox in my closet for years but now I've had them digitized and I'm going to be rolling them out in weekly posts along with some new writing that connects the Orioles' past to the present. The Bird Tapes is housed on the Substack media platform. The web address is birdtapes.substack.com. It's a subscription-based model and subscribers gain access to the vintage interviews for a small monthly fee. So far I have posted my quarter-century-old interviews with Brooks Robinson, Earl Weaver and Ernie Harwell, the legendary broadcaster who was the Orioles' first play-by-play man. Next up: Paul Blair. I've written articles about Mark Belanger and Brooks, and much, much more is coming. The response to the rollout of the Bird Tapes has been great so far. Please subscribe if interested at birdtapes.substack.com.  
    • We drafted him for his elite speed and defense. If the bat plays - he could be a star. If not, he could still be a useful piece. You don't see the same projections from Cowser, Westburg or Kjerstad because those were bat-first players. There's a reason we're having trouble finding space for guys like Kjerstad and Norby.  Also you're going to say it might be his first draft flop after 13 games at A+? Wild. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...