Jump to content

No One to the HOF 2013


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

They've gotta change something. Perhaps the strongest HOF class since the 1st one, and not one guy elected?

Also, isn't this a disaster for Cooperstown, NY, and the HOF itself? How much of their annual revenue comes from the induction festivities?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely and purely disgraceful on the part of the voters. I can understand not voting for someone who was found to have cheated, tried to cheat, or for whom the evidence (Mitchell Report) suggests that they did cheat or did something illegal. However, to rob others based on fabrication, delusional theories, complete hearsay, and pure imagination, is a slap in the face to the very integrity of the game that these self-righteous voters claim to be operating in the name of in the first place. Not voting for Bonds or Clemens, I can understand. But not voting for Craig Biggio, and others, solely because of association, is disgraceful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely and purely disgraceful on the part of the voters. I can understand not voting for someone who was found to have cheated, tried to cheat, or for whom the evidence (Mitchell Report) suggests that they did cheat or did something illegal. However, to rob others based on fabrication, delusional theories, complete hearsay, and pure imagination, is a slap in the face to the very integrity of the game that these self-righteous voters claim to be operating in the name of in the first place. Not voting for Bonds or Clemens, I can understand. But not voting for Craig Biggio, and others, solely because of association, is disgraceful.

Biggio got a lot of votes. I think he's more of a "not a first ballot hall of famer" victim this year. I think he'll get in next year. I hate that Morris didn't get in this year...partially due to the blank ballots being submitted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely and purely disgraceful on the part of the voters. I can understand not voting for someone who was found to have cheated, tried to cheat, or for whom the evidence (Mitchell Report) suggests that they did cheat or did something illegal. However, to rob others based on fabrication, delusional theories, complete hearsay, and pure imagination, is a slap in the face to the very integrity of the game that these self-righteous voters claim to be operating in the name of in the first place. Not voting for Bonds or Clemens, I can understand. But not voting for Craig Biggio, and others, solely because of association, is disgraceful.

Amber asked a player of the era if they thought 70 percent of his peers had used PEDs. She was told that her guess was naively low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggio got a lot of votes. I think he's more of a "not a first ballot hall of famer" victim this year. I think he'll get in next year. I hate that Morris didn't get in this year...partially due to the blank ballots being submitted.

Biggio did get a lot of votes, but I've no doubt the reason he didn't get enough was because of the very reasons I stated, the dreaded guilt by association, and the "era" in which he played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggio got a lot of votes. I think he's more of a "not a first ballot hall of famer" victim this year. I think he'll get in next year. I hate that Morris didn't get in this year...partially due to the blank ballots being submitted.

Man I hate that "first ballot stuff." Biggio deserves to be there, so what difference does it make if its a first time vote or not? Its these baseball writers trying to be more powerful than they should be, and its ridiculous. Same with Cal not getting votes because "No one should get 100% votes." WTF is that?

To me, Morris, Biggio, and Piazza all should have been in this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggio did get a lot of votes, but I've no doubt the reason he didn't get enough was because of the very reasons I stated, the dreaded guilt by association, and the "era" in which he played.

That and sportswriters are babies. The guys on mlb radio were talking about the need to add voters from other sources. I can think of at least 5 guys on here that I'd give a vote that I'm pretty sure would be more professional about the whole process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I hate that "first ballot stuff." Biggio deserves to be there, so what difference does it make if its a first time vote or not? Its these baseball writers trying to be more powerful than they should be, and its ridiculous. Same with Cal not getting votes because "No one should get 100% votes." WTF is that?

To me, Morris, Biggio, and Piazza all should have been in this year.

100% with you on that. I've never understood it...it's not like they have a separate room with first ballot guys at Cooperstown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how many blank ballots were submitted, and if eliminating them would have pushed anyone over 75% or 5%.

Not sure. I think they said that Biggio was 39 votes short. Might have made the difference for Morris too. That's inexcusable for the writers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I hate that "first ballot stuff." Biggio deserves to be there, so what difference does it make if its a first time vote or not? Its these baseball writers trying to be more powerful than they should be, and its ridiculous. Same with Cal not getting votes because "No one should get 100% votes." WTF is that?

To me, Morris, Biggio, and Piazza all should have been in this year.

:ohlord:

Not until Dave Stieb gets in!

Morris would instantly replace Rice as the biggest reach by the voters in my lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...