Jump to content

Are the Reds Backing Out ?


33rdst

Recommended Posts

Everybody talking about the need to get back a Pitcher in a Bedard deal has me baffled. The addition of Patton and Albers to Penn, Olson, Liz and company leaves us very deep in pitching prospects. Additional deals like the proposed Roberts to the Cubs trade, makes us even deeper. We need the best players we can get. But, position players are a glaring weakness right now. I'd take Jones, Clement and Triunfel immediately. That would be a great deal for us IMO.

I personally like Morrow because his upside in much better than the guys you mention above. But I agree a pitcher isn't necessary.

What I would like to do is trade one of the many guys you mentioned in addition to Bedard and get back a pitcher that is further off, but has higher upside (Tillman, for example).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Everybody talking about the need to get back a Pitcher in a Bedard deal has me baffled. The addition of Patton and Albers to Penn, Olson, Liz and company leaves us very deep in pitching prospects. Additional deals like the proposed Roberts to the Cubs trade, makes us even deeper. We need the best players we can get. But, position players are a glaring weakness right now. I'd take Jones, Clement and Triunfel immediately. That would be a great deal for us IMO.

Reading several Mariners forums, I get the sense that Triunfel is pretty untouchable for them. Considering some think he can be better than Tejada, that's saying something. Morrow seems to be a sticking point, but we don't need him to be in the deal. Tillman and Butler are pretty good pitching prospects. Both probably project to be #2's or #3's. It's always nice to get pitching in trades because it seems to be a valuable commodity because you can never have enough, so I would want one of these guys back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody talking about the need to get back a Pitcher in a Bedard deal has me baffled. The addition of Patton and Albers to Penn, Olson, Liz and company leaves us very deep in pitching prospects. Additional deals like the proposed Roberts to the Cubs trade, makes us even deeper. We need the best players we can get. But, position players are a glaring weakness right now. I'd take Jones, Clement and Triunfel immediately. That would be a great deal for us IMO.

I see what your saying, but I just dont see Liz, Olson, or Albers being anything more than a 4-5. I know it might be too early to tell, but Id go after Morrow.

Also, Id rather have Morrow over Clement is becuase we already have Weiters. But, if Clement can be flipped I would take Clement. Either deal works for me, but I prefer Morrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...