Jump to content

Jurrjens Silence is Deafening (Deal in doubt?)


BillySmith

Recommended Posts

Stating the obvious, but have I missed anything or is it pretty clear that this signing may be in jeopardy. I think Roch or maybe Encina might have speculated about more tests being done, but I could be completely wrong.

Is this just the normal Angelos way of checking medicals? I hope it's just normal business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Stating the obvious, but have I missed anything or is it pretty clear that this signing may be in jeopardy. I think Roch or maybe Encina might have speculated about more tests being done, but I could be completely wrong.

Is this just the normal Angelos way of checking medicals? I hope it's just normal business.

There is nothing normal about the way medicals are checked under Angelos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if it's one thing I like about Angelos it's that he's thorough when it comes to medical records and physicals. Especially with a guy like this. Take your time.

Didn't Angelos personally decide that Aaron Sele failed his physical because he thought he saw something on a scan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Angelos personally decide that Aaron Sele failed his physical because he thought he saw something on a scan?
I think you're right. And again, I'm ok with that.

No, I don't think Angelos made the medical diagnosis, but he's the one who decided he wanted to modify the deal with Sele after the doctors found "moderate wear and tear that potentially could worsen by the third or fourth year of Sele's contract." http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2000-01-11/sports/0001110013_1_sele-orioles-gillick

It's interesting to see that Sele then had two excellent seasons, deteriorated pretty significantly in Year 3, and had a very poor Year 4.

2000: 34 starts, 211 IP, 4.51 ERA

2001: 33 starts, 215 IP, 3.60 ERA

2002: 26 starts, 160 IP, 4.89 ERA

2003: 25 starts, 121 IP, 5.77 ERA

Using fWAR, Sele was not worth $29 mm over the four years, though he was worth about $19 mm in the first two seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • There's probably enough excess depth to pull off at least two of those moves. That might be enough to bring home at least one trophy, in a scenario where they just refuse to increase payroll from here. Can't hope for better in that case.
    • I never said that Urias can bring back a starting pitcher on his own. Not sure why you ask that question leading off your post. If you're simply stating that Urias only makes sense to trade if he brings back a starting pitcher, I totally disagree with that. And yes, I do know that Urias doesn't have enough value to bring back a starting pitcher. But I have no idea why you'd lead off a response with that kind of question, though. It's not applicable to what I said. I also disagree that Urias would need to be part of a package. He may be part of a package, but he can be traded on his own as well.  I simply said the Orioles need to trade Urias. I have full faith that Elias would get decent value for him. And it doesn't necessarily need to be pitching, although there's a good chance Elias would try to land pitching in return. And there's added value in opening up playing time for Ortiz and Westburg that a Urias trade would make possible as well. To answer your other question, I'd trade Norby, Prieto, Hall, and Stowers. But I'd trade Urias, Mateo, and Santander first. I'd trade Mountcastle too, but he might have the least perceived value to other teams of any of those guys.
    • Are you actually making the point (I don't think you are) that starting pitching is irrelevant in the post season? Or that we should be okay with the worse rotation (by a good amount) entering into the AL postseason because "how much does it actually matter"?
    • How much does it actually matter?  In the playoffs, how often does the team with the best rotation on paper actually win the series?    
    • Kinda slow around here lately.   Maybe a Dragon Ball Z reference will spice things up.  Heh. https://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/todd-monken-lamar-jackson-unlock-super-saiyan-version
    • What is Snell really? This isn't 2018 anymore. he's nothing better than the "5 and dive" guys that we already have. We don't need another one IMO. We need a real impact starter. I think we can and should set our sights a lot higher than the Blake Snell of 2023.
    • Anything is possible during this transitional time, but as I wrote earlier, I think they could gamble as you said. They spread things out in past drafts, and it was wise because they added quality talented depth. They can gamble a little here, and I think they did that last year as well when you think about McLean and the Walters, Young and another that escapes me right now. Gambling with the first pick is a little different, though.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...